1 / 10

Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law

Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law. Environmental Law Fall 2008. The “Old” Administrative Law. Fights over New Deal proliferation of agencies, push for procedural checks 1946—”contending forces came to rest” on Administrative Procedure Act (APA)

tamara-price
Download Presentation

Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overton Park and the“New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008

  2. The “Old” Administrative Law • Fights over New Deal proliferation of agencies, push for procedural checks • 1946—”contending forces came to rest” on Administrative Procedure Act (APA) • Emphasis on Independent Regulatory Agencies (economic regulation) • Emphasis on big, formal proceedings (esp. trial-type hearings)

  3. Evolution of the (No Longer) New Administrative Law • Capture and “Iron Triangle” theories • Debunking of neutral expertise • Single-mission rather than single-industry agencies • Executive rather than Congressional accountability • Public participation, “new public interest lawyers” • Aggressive judicial review (“hard look”)

  4. Simplified Iron Triangle:Forest Products USDA Forest Service Congressional Overseers Timber Industry Recreational users, enviros, etc.

  5. Complex Iron Triangles:Major Dams USACE, BLM, FERC, BPA Enviros Endangered Species Bureaucracies Tribal governments Fishers (commercial, sport, agencies) Etc., etc., etc. Electric Utilities, Consumers, Barge operators, Irrigators, etc. Congressional overseers, Executive, Media

  6. The practice of Environmental Law is (almost always) political lawyering. You need to be aware of the political context, and the problems and opportunities it creates.

  7. The Overton Era • Things other than formal adjudication and formal rulemaking can be reviewed as “final agency action” (There is a strong presumption of reviewability.) • “Proprietary functions” are as reviewable as other functions. • A paper trail can be an “administrative record.” • If the administrator doesn’t create a proper paper trail, s/he can be deposed and face trial in a district court.

  8. Overton, continued • Agency discretion will be narrowly construed (loss of trust in objectivity and neutrality) • Part of “abuse of discretion” review is policing whether the agency has looked at the right factors and assigned them the proper weights (under the statute). • “Arbitrary and capricious” fact review is meaningful (“hard look”).

  9. Underlying assumption:Judicial review is an important check on bias and capture. This accountability mechanism should be widely available.

  10. Checklist of Grounds for Court Reversal • Violation of statute (includes failure to consider proper factors, wrong weighting) • Didn’t provide procedures required by law • Specific statute • APA or other general statute (e.g., NEPA) • Agency’s rules of practice • Inadequate factual support • Substantial evidence (formal/hybrid rulemaking or adjudication) • Arbitrary and capricious • Constitutional defects

More Related