1 / 15

Barbara Livoreil 1,2 , Andrew Pullin 1 , Carsten Neßhöver , Marie Vandewalle ,

Bridging the communication gap between evaluation and decision - making : the Network of Knowledge approach for Europe. Barbara Livoreil 1,2 , Andrew Pullin 1 , Carsten Neßhöver , Marie Vandewalle , Ilse Geizjendorffer , Rob Jongman. 1. 2. Table of contents. Introduction

tamal
Download Presentation

Barbara Livoreil 1,2 , Andrew Pullin 1 , Carsten Neßhöver , Marie Vandewalle ,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bridging the communication gap betweenevaluation and decision-making: the Network of Knowledgeapproach for Europe Barbara Livoreil1,2, Andrew Pullin1, CarstenNeßhöver, Marie Vandewalle, IlseGeizjendorffer, Rob Jongman 1 2

  2. Table of contents • Introduction • the KNEU (NoK) project • whatis a network of knowledge • scale, whythisNoK, types of knowledge • The actors • The prototype process • Nextsteps

  3. www.biodiversityknowledge.eu

  4. 18 Partners KNEU Partnership UFZ, Germany (Coordination) NERC-CEH, UKRBINS,Belgium CIIMAR, Portugal NIOZ, Netherlands FRB, France ALTERRA, NetherlandsUNIVIE, Austria NINA, Norway CSIC, Spain MTA IEB HAS, Hungary ECNC, Netherlands Bangor University, United Kingdom EVINBO, Belgium EAA, Austria SYKE, Finland BEC, Ireland VLIZ, Belgium = Ca 40 experts

  5. INTRODUCTION 3 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  6. INTRODUCTION • Whatis a Network of Knowledge? • Scale of the network: within the KNEU project, and globally (ipbes) Whyusing a NoKratherthan have a list of trusted experts? What type of knowledge, types of knowledge and susceptibility to bias (challenges of confidence, risk in decision-making) 3 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  7. THE ACTORS

  8. THE ACTORS • REQUESTERS • NoK • KNOWLEDGE COORDINATING BODY • KCB KNOWLEDGE COORDINATING BODY • Ad-hoc WORKING GROUPS REQUESTERS • WORKING GROUPS Political institutions (DGs), ministries, European and national agencies, European or international conventions, private sector and its umbrella organisations , NGOs • SCOPING GROUP • SCOPING GROUP • (PEER)-REVIEWERS REVIEWERS KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS / PROVIDERS Scientists, practitioners, administrations, companies, NGOs, indigenous and local people, scientificsocieties, institutes, governmentalagencies, consultants…) Livoreil et al. Version 9 – Sept 2011

  9. THE PROTOTYPE

  10. THE STEPS REQUEST DIALOGUE & SCOPING PREPARING TENDER PROCESS AGREEMENT ON TEAM AND PROTOCOL PROCESSING KNOWLEDGE CONDUCTING Evidence-basedframework Adaptive management Other method Expert consultation RESULTS PEER-REVIEW OF RESULTS FINAL REPORT FINALISING CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP 18 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  11. PREPARING: DIALOGUE & SCOPING • SCOPING* • DIALOGUE INITIAL REQUEST KCB SCOPING GROUP Searchterms, scale… KCB REQUESTER Availableknowledge and experts EXPERTS SCOPE, SCALE, TOPIC…. PROBLEMS/CONCERNS INTO QUESTIONS SUBQUESTIONS FEASIBILITY COSTS, RESOURCES Scoping group helpsadaptingrequest and evaluatingfeasibilitybased on : consultation (scopjng) of knowledgedatabases (direct or via NoK) quick consultation of NoK (experts) Evaluation quantity of experts available Project management Publication databases FINAL REQUEST ready for call for tender 22 Livoreil et al. Version 10 – Sept 2011 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  12. QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS (meta-analysis) • CONSENSUS • NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS • COMPREHSENSIVE LIST OF KNOWLEDGE + OPEN CONSULTATION (open-access) • APPRAISAL OF QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE • SEVERAL ROUNDS OF CONSULTATION / ANSWERS • PRACTITIONER & STEKEHOLDER consultation • CoMPREHENSIVE LIST OF KNOWLEDGE • Identify GAPS & UNCERTAINTIES • PARTICIPATORY MODELLING • SCENARIO BUILDING • POLICY/MANAGEMENT plan • LEARNING CYCLE CONDUCTING • WORKING GROUP www NoK + FINAL REQUEST and APPROVED PROTOCOL KCB REQUESTER Preliminarylist of knowledge & experts fromscoping WG keeps KCB aware of advancement and possible problemsencountered ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT EXPERT CONSULTATION EVIDENCE BASED METHOD • COMPLETING LIST OF EXPERTS AND/OR SELECTING EXPERTS MAPPING KNOWLEDGE • DRAFT REPORT • RECOMMENDATIONS • LIMITATIONS Go to step FINALISING 28 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  13. FINALISING: CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP • REQUESTERS REQUEST • NoK • KNOWLEDGE COORDINATING BODY DIALOGUE & SCOPING TENDER PROCESS AGREEMENT ON TEAM AND PROTOCOL PROCESSING KNOWLEDGE Evidence-basedframework Adaptive management Other method Expert consultation KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS PROVIDERS POST-OPERATORY FEEDBACKS EVALUATIONS RESULTS PEER-REVIEW OF RESULTS FINAL REPORT DISSEMINATION CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP 31 Livoreil et al. version 13– Jan 2012

  14. The nextsteps The prototype willbetestedwith 3 case studies • Marine: seagrass • Conservation: green infrastructure • Agriculture: biofuels?

  15. GET INVOLVED Comment the prototype Joinour 1st conference (May 2012) Getinvolved in our case studies Registeryour expertise www.biodiversityknowledge.eu EEEN and Nok, EEEN and IPBES… How to cooperate ?

More Related