local consultative committees n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 164 Views
  • Uploaded on

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES. A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels. Introduction. Aim of a framework for LCC’s: To facilitate comparison of results LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE Scale Degree Composition of intervention of intervention and relations

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES' - talon-carpenter


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
local consultative committees

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES

A.Kuhk / J. Verleye

Departement Architectuur

Sint-Lucas Brussels

introduction
Introduction
  • Aim of a framework for LCC’s:

To facilitate comparison of results

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

Scale Degree Composition

of intervention of intervention and relations

  • The co-ordination of the PICT-project in Brussels is lead by Dag Boutsen, Annette Kuhk, Martijn Stellingwerff, Johan Verleye and Johan Verbeke, some of which are members of the CAAD-group Sint-Lucas.
topics of discussion
Topics of Discussion

Kind of urban intervention

Actors involved

Composition and functioning of the LCC

comparison of cases
Comparison of cases

Differences in:

  • Scale
  • Duration and phasing
  • Budget
  • Legal frame

Sites of regional importance

Neighbourhood contracts

Urban regeneration

Social development

Expansion areas

Densification

actors in the cases
Actors in the cases
  • Overview and classification
  • Co-ordination and hierarchies

Table: Classification of political and societal actors, based on Howlett and Ramesh (1995, p. 52)

setup of lcc s
Setup of LCC’s
  • Composition (cfr. actors in case)
  • Relations and positions
  • Tasks of the LCC
  • Timing

Societal actors

CITIZENS

Voluntary groups

Political actors

PLANNERS

Collaborative framework = LCC

Entrepreneurs

composition of the lcc s
Composition of the LCC’s

Distribution of:

Age

Gender

Ethnicity

Educational level

Institutionalisation

Professions

Budgets

etc.

To compare conditions of LCC’s in different cases

  • Analysis of:
  • Degree of involvement at different stages of the project
  • Competencies in terms of use of ICT
  • Needs in terms of use of ICT
tasks of the lcc s
Tasks of the LCC’s
  • Learning for PARTICIPATION

facilitator for effective mediation

between planners and clients

  • Innovative ICT training

preparation and implementation

LCC: Executive or developing?

brussels real life
Brussels’ Real Life

A matter of perspective!

‘Birds and Mice’

‘Have and have nots’

?

what this means
What This Means
  • Power of LCC:

development AND implementation

  • Smoothen the path for technological innovation in inclusive planning modes
  • Different design for urban developments?
next steps
Next Steps
  • Brief survey on LCC’s and cases
  • Follow-up questionnaire on tasks and implementation of new ICT through the LCC’s
  • Concluding report on effectiveness and efficiency of LCC’s