1 / 6

52 nd SDM Materials Sessions

52 nd SDM Materials Sessions. Gary Don Seidel Virginia Tech gary.seidel@vt.edu (540)231-9897. Materials Abstracts. Number of abstracts: 77 (last year 94) Number of accepted abstracts: 66 – 86% acceptance ratio (78 - 83% acceptance ratio) Number of rejected abstracts: 11 (16)

taima
Download Presentation

52 nd SDM Materials Sessions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 52ndSDM Materials Sessions Gary Don Seidel Virginia Tech gary.seidel@vt.edu (540)231-9897

  2. Materials Abstracts Number of abstracts: 77 (last year 94) Number of accepted abstracts: 66 – 86% acceptance ratio (78 - 83% acceptance ratio) Number of rejected abstracts: 11 (16) Number of withdrawn abstracts/papers: 8 (17) Total number of presentations: 58 (61) Student papers: 12 abstracts 10 papers (11 papers) Total number of reviews assigned: 231 (270) Total number of reviews completed: 219 – 95% (230 – 85%) 82% TC Member Participation in Review; 7 rpm vs 8.5 rpmMax Reviewed: 12 (5 ppl) Min Reviewed: 0,3

  3. Materials Abstracts • Abstract rejections were based on reviewer scoring system out of 100 on five categories: • Technical Quality – 20 pnts • Importance/Relevance to Field – 20 pnts • Originality – 20 pnts • Conciseness/Style/Clarity – 20 pnts • Potential to be a Good Paper – 20 pnt • Reviewers Rate Each Category with: Excellent, Above Average, Average, Below Average, Poor • Average total score from all reviewers used to establish rank order • Took Top 66 Abstracts to Fill All Allocated Sessions • Cut-off score: 57 (i.e. rejected above avg. abstracts)

  4. Materials Sessions • Breakdown • Total sessions: 12 (last year 15) • Regular sessions: 6 (7) • Special sessions: 6 (8) • Five-paper sessions: 6 (12) • Six-paper sessions: 6 (3) • Special sessions (solicited and organized by individuals) • Nanostructured Materials – Samit Roy, Ed Glaessgen, Greg Odegard, Brian Wardle (3 6-paper sessions) • Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME)– John Matlik (2 5-paper sessions) • Multifunctional Materials – KunigalShivakumar (1 5-paper session)

  5. Materials Sessions

  6. Special Thanks • Reviewers for Student Paper Competition: • Samit Roy • Steve Wanthal • TC Rep to Student Paper Judging: • Greg Schoeppner

More Related