1 / 31

Last updated 5/4/2004

Responsibility Center Management. RCM 101. Last updated 5/4/2004. David Proulx, Senior Financial Analyst - RCM Project Manager EMail: d_proulx@unhn.unh.edu Budget Office Website: http://www.unh.edu/budget RCM Website: http://www.unh.edu/rcm. RCM 101. Presentation Outline.

tabib
Download Presentation

Last updated 5/4/2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Responsibility Center Management RCM 101 Last updated 5/4/2004 David Proulx, Senior Financial Analyst - RCM Project Manager EMail: d_proulx@unhn.unh.edu Budget Office Website: http://www.unh.edu/budget RCM Website: http://www.unh.edu/rcm

  2. RCM 101 Presentation Outline 1. UNH Overview 2. RCM Model 3. RCM Implementation Process

  3. RCM 101 UNH Background UNH Overview • Public land, sea and space grant University • 11,739 undergraduate; 2,324 graduate students • Part of the University System of New Hampshire (USNH) – separate board of trustees • 17% of current fund budget from State • 50th in state support per capita

  4. RCM 101 UNH Background, cont. UNH Overview • University maintains own fund balance • $360 million current fund budget • $95 million – research expenditures

  5. RCM 101 UNH Overview VISION The University of New Hampshire will be distinguished for combining the living and learning environment of a small New England liberal arts college with the breadth, spirit of discovery, and civic community of a land grant research institution.

  6. Vision RCM 101 UNH Overview Institutional Effectiveness Evaluating Responsibility Centered Management Evaluating Academic Plan Monitoring Performance Academic Planning Master Plan Capital Campaign RC Unit Planning College/School plans Technology Plans Staffing Plans Financial Plans Outreach and Research Professional Development Assessment Process (Balanced Scorecard) Planning Financial Perspective Academic Perspective Stakeholder Perspective Innovation and Learning Perspective Implementation Resource Management Unit budgets Reserves Central Budget Committee Provost’s Strategic Planning Initiative Private Giving Process Redesign (Business Service Centers) Responsibility Centered Management Financial Reporting Systems (BANNER)

  7. RCM 101 Presentation Outline 1. UNH Overview 2. RCM Model 3. RCM Implementation Process

  8. RCM 101 Why RCM? RCM Model • Decentralization of Budget Authority • Increase: • Incentives for planning, cost effectiveness and revenue generation • Local responsibility and authority • Flexibility to match revenue streams with changing program demands • Attentiveness to all categories of money • Accountability at all levels of management • Decrease: • Rigid resource allocation process • Involvement of institutional leaders in budgetary detail • Mystery and mistrust surrounding UNH finances • “Use it or lose it” mentality at all levels of management

  9. RCM 101 The National Context RCM Model A survey completed in 19961 by NACUBO found: • 11% of Private Higher Ed institutions employ a decentralized budget model (75 surveyed) • .06% of Public Higher Ed institutions employ a decentralized budget model (160 surveyed) A survey completed in 20002 by the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute found: • 47% of Private Higher Ed institutions employ a decentralized budget model (71 surveyed) • 8% of Public Higher Ed institutions employ a decentralized budget model (127 surveyed) 1 RCM as a Catalyst, NACUBO Business Officer. 8/1997 2 Survey of the Resource Allocation Methodologies Employed at Public and Private Research and Doctoral Universities. Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, 1/4/2000.

  10. RCM 101 RCM Model Old Budget System

  11. Revenue - Tuition - Indirect Cost Recovery - State Appropriation Revenue - Direct Revenue (Grant, Gift, Sales, Fees, etc.) Central Budget RC Units Committee - Academic - Incremental funding - Research decisions - Auxiliary - $700k University Fund allocation - Service Unit Advisory Board subcommittee to review Service Units if necessary Direct Expense Institutional Overhead - Salaries, Wages & Benefits - Facilities - Support - CIS - Debt service - Student Affairs - VP Research - General Admin - Academic Affairs RCM 101 RCM Model RCM Budget System

  12. RCM 101 RC Units RCM Model Colleges and Related Service Units College of Life Sciences and Agriculture College of Liberal Arts College of Engineering and Physical Sciences Whittemore School of Business and Economics School of Health and Human services UNH - Manchester Library Student and Community Life Units Student Affairs Housing Hospitality Services Intercollegiate Athletics Whittemore Center Arena Research and Public Service Units Cooperative Extension Research and Public Service New Hampshire Public Television Institute for Earth, Oceans, and Space Governance, Advancement and Infrastructure Units Facilities Services Computing and Information Services General Administration Academic Affairs

  13. RCM 101 RCM Principles RCM Model 1. Create incentives for good management 2. Fairness/Simplicity 3. Unit plans must align with University’s mission and strategic plan 4. Smooth transition - no redistribution of resources 5. Credible governance mechanisms required to prevent unhealthy internal competition 6. Same rules for all operations – academic, research, auxiliary, administrative

  14. RCM 101 RCM Principles, cont. RCM Model • RCM principles/formulas apply to the RC unit level. • RC units receive all revenue and are responsible for all expenditures generated by their activities. • RC units carry forward excess funds from one year to next and manage reserves at the unit level. • Each RC unit determines how to manage RCM within their unit. • RCM is not a cost accounting model but rather a general incentive/allocation model.

  15. RCM 101 RC Unit Revenues* RCM Model • Direct revenues - fees, sales of goods/services, gifts, grants/contracts, endowment income • Allocated revenues: • Undergraduate tuition - based on weighted credit hours taught over the past two years. Weights are based on historical average expense per credit hour. • Graduate tuition - based on enrollment • State Appropriations - based on faculty salaries • Indirect Cost Revenue - based on actual indirect costs generated * Go to RCM Allocations for more details

  16. RCM 101 RC Unit Expenses* RCM Model • Direct Expenses - salaries, wages, fringe benefits, equipment, travel, supplies, other direct expenses. • Allocated expenses (overhead): • Facilities Services (maintenance, utilities, housekeeping, grounds and roads, R&R) - based on net square feet ($15.40 per NSF) • General Administration (President, Research, Finance & Administration, Student Affairs, and support units reporting to VP’s) - based on prior fiscal year revenues and personnel expenses. Average rate – 11% of total revenues. • Academic Affairs (Provost, Registrar, Financial Aid Office, Admission and other units reporting to Provost) - based on prior fiscal year revenues and personnel expenses. Average rate – 7% of total revenues. * Go to RCM allocations for more details

  17. RCM 101 “Balancing Adjustment” RCM Model • Major principle of RCM was that no unit would begin better or worse off than they would have been under the old system –thus they were ‘held harmless’ • A "balancing adjustment" was used to bring Units into RCM in a "revenue neutral" budget position • Balancing adjustments are permanent but not inflated

  18. RCM 101 The University Fund RCM Model • Balancing adjustments do not inflate and are funded from state appropriations. • Inflation proceeds become the “University Fund” • “University Fund” is flexible central funding to allocate based on strategic priorities of the institution • Managed by the Central Budget Committee (CBC) • Units make requests via strategic plans to their VP. VP brings requests before the CBC. CBC decides to provide permanent, one time or no funding.

  19. RCM 101 Reserves RCM Model • Under RCM, unspent funds at year end are automatically added to the School/College fund balance. This required a change in Board of Trustee policy. • RC units are obligated to meet an agreed upon minimum fund balance level (initially 1% of prior year expenditures and transfers). • RC units can access reserves – up to 1/3 of balance with Dean/Director approval only; remainder with VP approval. • Unit reserves reduce dependence on limited central reserves

  20. Academic Unit: RCM 101 RCM Model

  21. RCM 101 Units in Financial Difficulty RCM Model • Deans and Unit Directors as well as responsible VP’s are held accountable for unit performance • Units that have operating deficits are required to: • Submit a mitigation plan describing how they plan to resolve the deficit over a defined period of time • Meet with the CFO and responsible VP on a quarterly basis to provide updates

  22. RCM 101 Presentation Outline 1. UNH Overview 2. RCM Model 3.RCM Implementation Process

  23. RCM 101 The Process RCM Implementation • Three years to implement • Coordinated by a Steering Committee – advisory to the President. • 12 Working Groups – each responsible for separate component of RCM. Reported to Steering Committee. Overall Composition of Steering Committee/Working Groups: 70% academic community members – 43% faculty and 28% Deans. Go to Committee page for more detail. • Communications • “We will meet with anyone, anywhere at anytime” to discuss RCM. • Multiple meetings with Trustees, Deans, faculty, staff councils, students • Web site established to facilitate communication • Campus newspapers used as a communication tool. See articles published in campus newspaper by clicking here. • Open forums held

  24. RCM 101 The Process, cont. RCM Implementation • Site visits to other Universities with decentralized budgeting. • Brought administrators, Deans and faculty to meet with counterparts. Board of Trustee Policy communications and support • Lots of financial modeling • Very complex in the beginning, simplified before implementation • Draft models shared with the community • Operating manual developed – hard copy and on-line

  25. RCM 101 Shared Governance RCM Implementation • Central Budget Committee • The governing group on budget policy and financial planning for the campus community. • Overall steward of RCM • Reviews fee increases • Comprised of President, Vice Presidents, 2 Deans, 4 Faculty, 2 RC Unit Directors, Student Treasurer • Service Unit Advisory Board • Functions as subcommittee of the Central Budget Committee • University Curriculum and Academic Policies Committee • Advisory to Provost – monitors academic quality and curriculum issues. • Comprised of Provost, 11Tenured Faculty, 2 Students, Chair of Academic Standards and Advising Committee

  26. RCM 101 • Academic Concerns About RCM • Concerns: • larger class sizes/increased teaching loads • grade inflation • addition of courses by colleges solely for the purposes of revenue generation • additional course fees • reduced collaboration among colleges for academic and research ventures • manipulation of credit hour system to “generate” additional revenue • increased use of graduate students and adjunct faculty for instruction • elimination of high quality/low revenue producing programs • incentives for student advisors to act in the interests of the college rather than the student for fear of losing tuition revenue • Response: • Most of these consequences could occur under the old budget system • Most of these actions taken by colleges would lead to short-term gain but would have long-term negative consequences • Development of policies, oversight mechanisms (UCAPC), institutional academic plan, college strategic plans, ongoing reviews and University Fund allocations can help to prevent these actions from occurring. RCM Implementation

  27. RCM 101 Reviews of RCM RCM Implementation • Ongoing monitoring of budgets by the Budget Office. • Central Budget Committee is responsible for monitoring RCM issues. • FY06 - comprehensive review of all aspects of RCM. Committee appointed by the President and chaired by the Provost. • June, 2006 – report due to the President

  28. RCM 101 Keys to Successful Implementation RCM Implementation • Top-level support – without President/Provost and Board of Trustee support, implementation will be unsuccessful. • Academic/research involvement in developing model – users must be part of the process. • Communication – meet with anyone, anytime, anywhere. Use the Web as a communication tool as well as campus publications. Hold open forums. • Establish credible governance mechanisms – assurance that RCM will be fair and equitable. Unhealthy internal competition is monitored and academic quality issues addressed. • Automatic rollover of unspent funds for units – without this, incentives of RCM do not work. • No budget reallocation – transition does not result in base budget changes – “hold harmless” principle.

  29. RCM 101 Keys to Successful Implementation, cont. RCM Implementation • Simplicity – most managers do not have financial backgrounds and should not devote significant parts of their time to their budget. They need to be able to understand the model and understand the financial effects of decisions quickly and easily • Full-time staff – dedicate full-time staff member to coordinate project • Business support structure – each unit must have access to financial expertise to be successful • Site visits – go see what others are doing and learn from their experiences • Avoid using acronyms such as RCM, RCB, DBS – they take on a meaning of their own and impede progress. • Timely and comprehensive management reporting.

  30. RCM 101 What Would We DoDifferently? RCM Implementation • We would not have named our system RCM. We would have called it budget redesign or budget decentralization. • Simplification of assessments. Current methodology is too complex. Lots of time being spent in this area by RC units. Cost outweighs the benefits. • We would have addressed structural issues before implementation. • Urban campus was built into the model using different weighting factors creating complexity in financial arrangements between campuses. • Library funding – treated them as a school/college rather than service unit. Issues with rising periodical costs. • Athletics funding – space cost allocations comprise a significant part of their budget (20%). This is a new expenditure for them under RCM.

  31. RCM 101 A Final Thought From our Provost, David Hiley in a letter to the University community: “We must remember that RCM is merely a tool. Like any tool it can be used well or badly. It is not a substitute for decision-making, judgement or leadership. It is merely an aid. The ultimate success of RCM depends on the people who use it -- on how we at UNH choose to use it, how we prepare ourselves to use it well, and how we are held accountable for using RCM to achieve university-wide goals.“

More Related