1 / 9

Wheelchair Smart Anti-Tip System Design

Wheelchair Smart Anti-Tip System Design. Kyle Mobley, BME Garrett Spiegel, BME Andrew Lossing, ChBE Advisor: Dr. Mark Richter, President. Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10. Current Anti-Tip Systems.

sylvia
Download Presentation

Wheelchair Smart Anti-Tip System Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wheelchair Smart Anti-Tip System Design Kyle Mobley, BME Garrett Spiegel, BME Andrew Lossing, ChBE Advisor: Dr. Mark Richter, President Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  2. Current Anti-Tip Systems • Wheelie bar • Decreased maneuverability • Increased rolling resistance • Increased chair weight • Hinders ability to perform wheelies • Hinders ability to perform curb cuts • Users commonly remove bars from chair Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  3. Smart Anti-Tip System (SATS) • Senses chair orientation, movement • Computes location of COG • If threshold exceeded, deploy wheelie bar • Wheelchair-specific threshold Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  4. SATS Advantages • Simultaneously allows maneuverability and protection from tipping • Eliminates need for user input • No need for user proficiency Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  5. Design Ideas Traditional System Rotational Deployment Axial Deployment Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  6. Traditional System A bar that hovers above the ground and engages when thresholds are exceeded. Advantages: Speed of Engagement Disadvantages: Maneuverability Uphill complications Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  7. Axial Deployment A bar that is retracted inside itself and deploys linearly beyond to wheel radius and catches when thresholds are exceeded. Advantages: Maneuverability Variable catch points Disadvantages: Speed of engagement Rewinding Implementation of catch points Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

  8. Rotational Deployment • A bar that is locked in a rotated “up” position that is released to swing down and catch when thresholds are exceeded. • Advantages: • Maneuverability • Safety/Variable catch points • Disadvantages: • Speed of Engagement • Rewinding

  9. Project Methods • Identify problem • Research of thresholds • Various levels of “tippiness” • Research of transducers • Design of sensing system • Design of wheelie bar deployment system • Construction of prototype • Testing of prototype • Revisions Lossing, Mobley, Spiegel http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2009/group5/ SATS Senior Design 2009-10

More Related