overview of grants submission process n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Overview of Grants Submission Process PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Overview of Grants Submission Process

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Overview of Grants Submission Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on

Overview of Grants Submission Process. Warren Calderone Director, Foundation, Government and Corporate Relations Co-Director, Shepherd University Research Corporation (SURC). External Funding Goals. Faculty development Student service Student learning and research experience

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Overview of Grants Submission Process' - sybil


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
overview of grants submission process
Overview of Grants Submission Process

Warren Calderone

Director, Foundation, Government and Corporate Relations

Co-Director, Shepherd University Research Corporation (SURC)

external funding goals
External Funding Goals
  • Faculty development
  • Student service
  • Student learning and research experience
  • Budget relief/new sources of funding
  • Student and faculty recruitment
  • University reputation and prestige
surc organization
SURC Organization

President Suzanne Shipley, Atty. Alan Perdue, Deborah Judd

VPs Diane Melby and Christopher Ames

Co-Directors: Warren Calderone (Director, Foundation, Govt. and Corp. Relations) and Dr. Colleen Nolan (Dean, SNSM)

surc grant roles
SURC Grant Roles
  • Build a “grant seeking culture” at Shepherd: encourage faculty and staff to apply for external grant or contract support
  • Serve as a sounding board for grant ideas and assist in getting those ideas, and eventual grant proposals, approved by executive staff
  • Help faculty and staff find grant opportunities and assist with the preparation and submission of grant proposals, including budgets
  • Assist the PI/PD, and the Finance office, in post-award activities (e.g., report submission tracking)
tools
Tools
  • Pre-Proposal Form and Concept Paper
  • Grant policies and procedures
  • SURC website
  • McAllister and Quinn resources
  • Proposal development and submission
  • Budget development/justification
  • Proposal review and approval
timeline
Timeline

Funding Announcement

Proposal Development

Internal Review: SURC

and Executive Staff

2 WEEKS PRIOR!

Grant Due Date

in the beginning concept
In the beginning: Concept

Two general tracks:

Idea Search for funders

RFP/FOA Align concept/idea

concept paper
Concept Paper
  • One to two page description of idea
  • Briefly explain:
    • Need
    • Objectives
    • Activities and timeframe
    • Personnel involved
    • Funding amount with any cost sharing
    • If applicable, grant criteria (e.g., NSF)
funding sources
Funding Sources

Public and Private

  • Public: Federal (grants.gov); State; local
  • Private: Corporate, family, and other foundations (Foundation Center search engine: free access at library)
exploring the fit
Exploring the Fit
  • Organizational– mission, vision, values
  • Organizational readiness
  • Partner requirements
  • Competitive
  • Regulations or “strings attached”
  • Source of cash or in-kind match, if applicable
  • Eligibility: lead applicant or partner
  • Deadline(s)
pre proposal form
Pre-proposal form
  • “Early warning system”
  • Faculty or staff member describes a potential project where external funding is needed
  • Alerts Administration to potential grant submission and any support (e.g., matching funds, space, in-kind or other University commitments) that may be needed. 
pre proposal form cont
Pre-proposal form (cont.)
  • Time-sensitive form: need as much advance notice as possible to secure approval from Executive Staff. Submit form at least 45 days before the grant due date.
  • Form is processed electronically
  • Executive approval of pre-proposal form is no guarantee of final approval of proposal. The proposal still has to go through internal review and approval before submission.
key proposal items
Key Proposal Items

Goals and Objectives

Needs Assessment or Problem Statement

Program Evaluation or Outcomes Assessment

Plan of Action/Activities to Address Need

proposal development
Proposal Development

Proposed Program

  • Be prescriptive about who you will serve, what and how you will serve them, who will conduct activities, where and when activities will occur
  • Establish a realistic timeline
  • Literature review to support project
proposal development1
Proposal Development

Sustainability

  • What will happen after the funding ends?
  • List matching funds, in-kind, revenue, etc.

Dissemination

  • How will you distribute results? Think usual (papers, posters, web, etc.) and innovative.
  • Funders like to be acknowledged!
proposal review and processing federal
Proposal Review and Processing--Federal
  • Preliminary Review
  • Reviewers Selected
  • Peer Review Panel (ad hoc, internal)
  • Program Officer Recommendation
  • Division Director Review
  • Business Review
  • Award Finalized
post award
Post-Award
  • Celebrate!
  • Budget negotiation sometimes involved
  • PI/institution sign grant award
  • Hold a post-award meeting with team: key staff, Finance, and evaluator
  • Be cognizant of reporting dates
if you do not win1
If you do not win
  • Don’t be discouraged. Success rates are low. Take a comprehensive approach to win.
  • Read the reviews carefully, if provided, and ask colleagues to do the same.
  • Discuss reviews with program officer.
  • Address reviews within resubmission.
slide25
MOUs
  • Proposals where Shepherd is not the lead applicant or fiscal agent
  • Partnering with another organization that has received a grant award
  • Need to develop a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Shepherd and that organization, describing exactly the obligations and responsibilities of all parties
  • Developed by our legal counsel
grant myths
Grant Myths

I don’t need to worry about the grant deadline

grant myths1
Grant Myths

I don’t need to be involved—we have a grant writer

grant myths2
Grant Myths
  • Cost sharing is not a problem
  • We don’t have to be that careful about in-kind cost sharing—no one is going to check
grant myths3
Grant Myths

We don’t have to respond to everything in the RFP

grant myths4
Grant Myths

Fonts, margins, page limits, etc. are not that important

Who cares about a few typoes!

grant myths5
Grant Myths
  • After we get the award, we’re on easy street
  • It doesn’t matter if I don’t submit grant reports
summary
Summary
  • SURC is here to help
  • The earlier you start the process, the better: allow sufficient time for executive staff review and approval
thank you
Thank you!

Warren Calderone

wcaldero@shepherd.edu

876-5065

304-671-2509