1 / 11

Systemic Capacity Framework Grand Valley Learning Network October 2013

Systemic Capacity Framework Grand Valley Learning Network October 2013. Systemic Capacity Framework. Professional Development System. Leadership Do we have the leadership at the necessary levels to drive the improvement efforts? Principal Leadership Distributed Leadership

sukey
Download Presentation

Systemic Capacity Framework Grand Valley Learning Network October 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Systemic Capacity FrameworkGrand Valley Learning NetworkOctober 2013

  2. Systemic Capacity Framework Professional Development System Leadership Do we have the leadership at the necessary levels to drive the improvement efforts? Principal Leadership Distributed Leadership Adaptive Leadership Guiding Coalition Human Resource System Resource Allocation System Human Do we have the right people and in the right positions? Will Skill/Competencies Efficacy Social Do we have the collective ability to change? Professional Capital Relational Trust Stakeholder Engagement Internal Accountability Collective Efficacy Instructional Guidance System

  3. Inventory Directions • Review items on the inventory, and register your color rating (write color in box). Green=fully in place. Green/Yellow=well developed and in place, some areas of advancement necessary. Yellow/Red=steps taken and some progress made, but sill need multiple areas of significant advancement. Red=no progress to date. 2. Identify any item for which you want further explanation. • As a team, share your assessments and your reasons/evidence for each item and try to reach consensus on a color rating. Register your consensus rating and the flipchart-sized template. • Time allowing, discuss who else needs to be part of your analysis and/or how might you be able to use these exercise in your school.

  4. Strategic Capacity Inventory--Leadership

  5. Strategic Capacity Inventory--Human

  6. Strategic Capacity Inventory--Social

  7. Strategic Capacity Inventory--Support Systems

  8. Bibliography Abelmann, C. & Elmore, R. (1999). When Accountability Knocks: Will Anyone Answer? CPRE Research Report. RR-42. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P.B., Allensworth, E., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (2005). Trust in Schools: A Resource for Improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership (3rded). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Childress, S., Richard F. E., & A. Grossman. "Note on the PELP Coherence Framework." Harvard Business School Publishing Case, 2004. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap . . . And Others Don’t. New York: Harper Business.

  9. Bibliography, Page 2 Collins, J. (2005). Good to Great and the Social Sectors. New York: Harper Business Press. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a New Structure for School Leadership. The Albert Shanker Institute. Elmore, R. F. (1996). “Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice.” Harvard Educational Review. 66(l): 1-26. Elmore, R. & Burney, D. (1998). Continuous Improvement in Community School District #2, New York City, University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, High Performance Learning Communities Project. Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. (1984). “Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Woolfolk, A. (2000). “Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Effect on Student Achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.

  10. Bibliography, Page 3 Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press. Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Boston: Harvard University Press. Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning Wheels: The Politics of Urban School Reform. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Kotter, John P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kotter, John P. (2002). The Heart of Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Newmann, F. M., R. Rutter, et al. (1989). “Organizational Factors that Affect School Sense of Efficacy, Community, and Expectations.” Sociology of Education. 62(4): 221-238.

  11. Bibliography, Page 4 O’Day, J., M. Goertz, et al. (1995). Building Capacity for Education Reform, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania. Putnam, R. D. (1995). "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital". Journal of Democracy,6 (1): 65–78. Resnick, L. B., Hall, M.W. (1998). Learning Organizations for Sustainable Education Reform. Daedalus ,127 (4). Seashore Louis, S., Leithwood, K., Walhstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning Wallace Foundation. Spillane, J. P., R. Halverson, et al. (1999). Distributed Leadership: Toward a Theory of School Leadership Practice. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal. Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. Cambridge, MA: University of University Press.

More Related