1 / 7

APA Citations

This paper explores various teaching approaches in mathematics, analyzing studies by Rogers (1998), Miller et al. (2004), and Walker et al. (1999), discussing implications for educators based on findings from different sources.

suchin
Download Presentation

APA Citations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APA Citations

  2. Citations within a paper • Single author • Rogers (1998) compared reaction times… • … on reaction times (Rogers, 1998) • Multiple (3 – 5) authors • First citation in text • Miller, Brownell, Smith, and Brown (2004) found… • After • Miller et al. (2004) found • Multiple (6+) authors • Walker et al. (1999) • List the first authors until references are differentiated

  3. More on citations in text • Use groups as authors • First - National Council of Teachers of Math [NCTM], 2006 • Following - NCTM (2006) • When to use “&” vs. “and” • and is used in the text outside of parentheses • & is used in the text inside parentheses • & is used in the reference page (bibliography)

  4. Only when’s… • Page numbers in citation when quoting “the best means of learning was through interactivity” (Smith, 2003, p. 33). • (J. Bobbard, personal communication, October 1, 2007)

  5. Reference list examples Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In W.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-391). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Sanders, S., Riccomini, P.R., & Witzel, B.S. (2005). The algebra readiness of high school students in South Carolina: Implications for middle school math teachers. South Carolina Middle School Journal, 13, 45-47. Schumm, J. S., Vaughn, S., & Saumell, L. (1994). Assisting students with difficult textbooks: Teacher perceptions and practices. Reading Research and Instruction, 34(1), 39-59. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.library.winthrop.edu/ehost/detail?hid=13&sid=4880cb06-a496-43f8-a7b3-9f3385e49963%40sessionmgr14&vid=4&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=psyh&AN=1995-30989-001

  6. More references Simpson, R. L., LaCava, P. G., & Graner, P. S. (2004). The no child left behind act: Challenges and implication for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(2), 67-75. South Carolina State Mathematics Standards. (2003). Retrieved February 14, 2005, from http://www.myscschools.com. Stein, M., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

  7. Look through examples in our readings • Examine one of the readings • Look for author citations • Look for multiple citations strung together • Look at subsequent citations from the same author in the same paragraph • Look at reference lists • Why is a standard in writing important? • http://www.library.cornell.edu/resrch/citmanage/apa

More Related