1 / 109

Introduction to Health Promotion Planning

Introduction to Health Promotion Planning. May 7-8, 2001 Nancy Dubois and Brian Hyndman The Health Communication Unit. Goal of Workshop. To assist those involved in health promotion with planning projects in organizational and community settings. Objectives of Workshop.

strub
Download Presentation

Introduction to Health Promotion Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Health Promotion Planning May 7-8, 2001 Nancy Dubois and Brian Hyndman The Health Communication Unit

  2. Goal of Workshop To assist those involved in health promotion with planning projects in organizational and community settings.

  3. Objectives of Workshop • By the end of the workshop, participants will: • understand the features of health promotion that make planning for health promotion projects different from other types of project planning; • be able to use a practical model of health promotion planning and apply it to organizational and community settings; • be able to conduct a situational assessment for a health promotion project; • be able to develop goals and objectives for a health promotion project; • be able to identify strategies, activities, resources and timelines for a health promotion project; and • understand the link between planning and evaluation and be able to incorporate appropriate program evaluation measures in the planning process.

  4. Format of Workshop • During the workshop, participants will: • apply lecture materials, worksheets and other practical tools to case studies; • work in small groups through each part of a health promotion planning model and share their ideas and experiences; and • interact with peers and workshop facilitators to address questions and issues arising from application of the workshop material to real and hypothetical issues.

  5. Health Promotion Project Planning Model • Preplanning and Project Management • Conduct a Situational Assessment • Identify Goals, Populations of Interest and Objectives • Identify Strategies, Activities and Resources • Develop Indicators • Review the Program Plan • Implement the Plan • Assess Results/Impact

  6. What is Planning? Planning is a series of decisions, from general strategic decisions (e.g., identifying priorities) to specific operational details (e.g., program implementation) , based on the collection and analysis of a wide range of information.

  7. Why Plan? • Planning helps you to get from your starting point to your desired end point. • Planning helps to direct resources (time, money and person power) to where they will have the greatest impact. • Planning is a critical process for ensuring the development and implementation of effective and appropriate health promotion programming.

  8. Warm up Exercise: Planning in Everyday Life • What are the key steps involved in planning a party? • What factors can you control? • What factors do you have to 'leave to chance'? • How will you know if your party planning has been successful?

  9. Health Promotion Planning Models • Step-by-step templates for planning health promotion initiatives • Commonly Used Planning Models: • Precede – Proceed Model • Needs/Impact-Based Planning Model

  10. Precede – Proceed Model • Draws on fields of epidemiology, social and behavioural science • Looks at desired outcomes first - asks the "why" before the "how” • Developed by Green and Kreuter (1999)

  11. PRECEDE • Predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling constructs in educational/environmental diagnosis and evaluation (i.e., factors that precede program implementation).

  12. PROCEED • Policy, regulatory and organizational constructs in educational and environmental development (i.e., factors that promote program implementation).

  13. Precede-Proceed Model

  14. Elements of Precede – Proceed Model Phase 1 - Social Diagnosis Phase 2 - Epidemiological Diagnosis Phase 3 – Behavioural/Environmental Diagnosis Phase 4 – Educational/Organizational Diagnosis Phase 5 - Administrative and Policy Diagnosis Phase 6 - Ready for Program Implementation Phases 7-9 - Data collection and evaluation

  15. Strengths of Precede – Proceed • Widely used. • Phase 1 can be undertaken collectively across a community. • Promotes community participation early in the process. • Provides a format for identifying factors related to health problems, behaviours and program implementation. • Integrates many health promotion theories. • Accounts for capacity to implement as well as need.

  16. Limitations of Precede – Proceed • Relies heavily on input and analysis of experts (training/technical assistance often required). • Not as much emphasis on socio-environmental conditions for health as some other models. • Tends to be problem-oriented rather than oriented towards positive health outcomes. • Emphasis typically on service programs delivered in practice settings. • Heavily data driven, requiring extensive surveys and record keeping. • Too ‘broad brush’ for certain situations.

  17. Needs/Impact-Based Planning Model • Systematic approach to planning developed by Toronto District Health Council (1996). • Model sets priorities based on identified needs, potential strategies to address needs and feasibility of potential strategies.

  18. Needs/Impact-Based Planning Model

  19. Strengths of Needs/Impact-Based Model • Considers values, ethics and other factors influencing decision making. • Provides a logical and systematic way to make planning and resource decisions. • Developed and applied in Ontario – recommended for use by Ontario Ministry of Health. • Includes determinants of health as indicators of health need. • Evaluation is inherent to model.

  20. Limitations of Needs/Impact-Based Model • Requires hardware and software package to implement. • Bringing the necessary stakeholders across the health continuum can be challenging. • The utility of this method will be influenced by: • the size of the information collection and analysis; and • the need for qualitative and quantitative research where sufficient information does not exist.

  21. 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 = PRIORITY = Setting Priorities

  22. 1 = 3 2 = 1 3 = 2 4 = 2 5 = 2 PRIORITY = 1 Setting Priorities

  23. Fifth Discipline

  24. EMPOWER Enabling Methods for Planning and Organizing Within Everyone’s Reach Enabling Methods for Planning and Organizing Within Everyone's Reach.  Gold, Green and Kreuter.  Jones & Barlett Publishers. info@jbpub.comhttp://www.jbpub.com

  25. On-Line Planning Resources for Health Promoters • Essential steps in the planning of a health promotion project • www.monash.edu.au/health/course-manual/1998/project-work/planning.htm • 101 questions for community health promotion planning • http://kinesiology/biosestate.edu/pemh5701C3101P.htm • On-line assistance step-by-step with your planning • http://www.innonet.org/

  26. On-Line Planning Resources for Health Promoters • Tools for Change - Canadian support for Not-for-profits • http://www.toolsofchange.com/English/firstsplit.asp • Community Tool Box - planning as one of many supports to community health promotion work • http://ctb.lsi.ukans.edu/

  27. Step 1: Pre-planning and Project Management

  28. Key Factors in Managing the Planning Process • Participation • Time • Money/resources • Data-gathering • Decision-making

  29. 1. Participation • Participation of clients, staff and stakeholders is critical. • Plan with people, not for them. • Involve stakeholders in every step of the process.

  30. Levels of Stakeholders • Core - on the planning team • Involved - frequently consulted or part of planning process • Supportive - providing some form of support • Peripheral - needs to be kept informed

  31. Levels of Stakeholders

  32. 2. Time • Participatory planning takes longer. • The participatory ideals of health promotion planning can, and often do, conflict with political and cost issues.

  33. 3. Money/Resources • Includes allocated funds, staff, time equipment and space. • Includes in-kind contributions from partners. • Opportunity costs. • Must consider short-term expense vs. long-term pay-off.

  34. 4. Data Gathering • Focus on health as more than the absence of disease. • Look for data on underlying determinants of health issues (income, education, social support, employment and working conditions, etc.). • Examine theories underlying priority health issues.

  35. Health Promotion Theory • “Systematically organized knowledge... devised to analyze, predict or otherwise explain the nature or behaviour of a specified set of phenomena that could be used as the basis for action.” -Van Ryn and Heany (1992) • "A strategy for handling data in research, providing modes of conceptualization for describing and planning.” -Glaser and Strauss (1967)

  36. Health promotion theories: • guide the selection of health promotion strategies (e.g., health communication campaigns); • guide the development of health promotion strategies; and • explain factors promoting and inhibiting change at the individual and societal levels.

  37. Three basic ways of looking at health • Biomedical model • Behavioural model • Socioenvironmental model

  38. Examples of Health Promotion Theories • stages of change • health belief model • social learning theory • diffusion of innovation • socioenvironmental theories • community mobilization theories (e.g., Rothman's typology: social planning, locality development and social action) • advocacy and political change theories (e.g., Saul Alinsky)

  39. Tips for Using Theory • view theories as guidelines, not "absolutes” • theories should be viewed as complementary, not mutually exclusive • NEVER apply a theory without a thorough understanding of your population of interest • theories should not be used as short cuts • beware of theories determining program outcomes (i.e., criteria for 'success' should be based on health promoting changes in your community, rather than successful application of theory

  40. Remember: • There are no 'right' or 'wrong' theories – just different ways of looking at health issues. • "Enough research will tend to support your theory.” -Murphy's Law

  41. 5. Decision Making • challenge of managing timely decisions throughout process • Decide whether to proceed with planning • decisions on timelines and allocation of resources • consideration of political context for planning

  42. Questions for Determining if Planning Should Proceed: • What are the factors favouring action on your health issue? • What are the factors limiting action? • What is it going to take to proceed with planning?

  43. Step 1 Exercise: Pre-planning and Project Management Using case study (see handout) and worksheets (pp. 14-15), identify and discuss: • Key stakeholder groups • Participants (who should be involved) • Available resources (financial and otherwise) • Data needs • When and how decisions will be made

  44. Step 1 Exercise: • What worked well? • What did not work well? • “Ah-has!” • How does exercise compare with planning in your organization?

  45. Step 2: Conduct a Situational Assessment

  46. What is a Situational Assessment? A snapshot of the 'present' used to plan for the future. "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” -Thomas Watson, Chair of IBM, 1958

  47. Is that different from a Needs Assessment? Yes it is! • Like needs assessment, situational assessment focuses on collecting data on community needs. • BUT it also considers the broader social, economic, political and environmental context affecting community health needs. • Situational assessment also considers strengths, assets and capacities, not just problems or needs.

  48. Why Conduct a Situational Assessment? • To set priorities. • To learn more about population of interest (i.e., who's affected by your health issue). • To anticipate trends and issues that may affect the implementation of your program.

  49. Information Sources • Perspectives of key stakeholders • Literature and previous experience • Health "needs" and demographic data • Existing mandates • Existing visions • PEEST (formerly known as PEST) analysis

  50. 1. Perspectives of Key Stakeholders • Population of interest • attitudes • opinions • beliefs • actions • Organization • degree of importance/value accorded to the health issue • Potential partners

More Related