1 / 8

Phase III – Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives and Recommendation of Wastewater Management Plan

Workshop – January 3, 2007. Lunenburg Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan. Phase III – Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives and Recommendation of Wastewater Management Plan. Project Administration. Next Workshop Meeting Completion schedule for Phase III Draft Report - January 2007

Download Presentation

Phase III – Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives and Recommendation of Wastewater Management Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workshop – January 3, 2007 Lunenburg Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan Phase III – Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives and Recommendation of Wastewater Management Plan

  2. Project Administration • Next Workshop Meeting • Completion schedule for Phase III • Draft Report - January 2007 • Review Draft Report - February 2007 • ENF submittal - End of February 2007 • Public Hearing - Winter - March 2008

  3. Impact Analysis • Economic • Construction Costs • Based on similar projects, and vendor pricing • O&M Costs • A total of the annual costs - 20 year planning period • Environmental Factors • CWMP Guidelines • EOEA permit requirements • Town of Lunenburg

  4. Environmental Analysis • Treatment and Effluent Quality • Drinking Water • Water Balance • Wetlands, Flood Plain, and Agricultural • Endangered and Protected Species • Septage Disposal • Odors, Air Quality and Noise • Open Space, Recreation, and Surface Water • Growth and Development • Aesthetic

  5. Selection Methodology Environmental and economic factors Weighted factors • Weighting are specific to each Area • Weighting based on a scale of 1 to 3 • 1 is a minor factor • 3 is a major factor Ranked alternatives • Each alternative ranked on a scale of 1 to 5 • 1 is most well suited • 5 is least well suited Rankings multiplied by weightings Weighted rankings were summed

  6. Decision Matrix Total weighted ranking scores Decision matrix incorporates weighted rankings for each study area • Lowest ranking - Most well suited • Highest ranking - Least well suited Each Area - Viable alternative with lowest ranking • Selected for the recommended plan

  7. Updated Tech Memo #1 –Refined Needs Areas • Land Board Comments • Needs Analysis Criteria • Title 5 System Inspections • Soils/Drainage Class • Depth to Bedrock • Lot Sizes • Water Supply Protection • Depth to Groundwater • Lunenburg Water Resource Protection District • Areas with Regulated Setbacks • Floodplains • Areas of Critical Environmental Concern • Priority/Estimated Habitat Areas • Historic District

  8. Questions and Comments

More Related