1 / 16

Advances in Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Making the Case for Ethnography

Advances in Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Making the Case for Ethnography. Daniel Dohan, Ph.D. Institute for Health Policy Studies & Dept. of Anthropology, History, & Social Medicine University of California, San Francisco. Overview. What is ethnography?

spyridon
Download Presentation

Advances in Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Making the Case for Ethnography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advances in Qualitative Methods in Health Research:Making the Case for Ethnography Daniel Dohan, Ph.D. Institute for Health Policy Studies & Dept. of Anthropology, History, & Social Medicine University of California, San Francisco

  2. Overview • What is ethnography? • and how does it compare with other HSR and policy research methods? • What are recent advances in ethnography? • and in its potential role in policy and services research?

  3. What is ethnography?A tool for social analysis • Qualitative data • Often from participant-observation (p-o) • Findings, themes, ideas, and interpretations emerge holistically through iterative analysis • Analysis guided by theoretical reflexivity • Engagement with theory & focus on understanding separates ethnography from non-fiction writing. • Commitment to self-reflexivity distinguishes ethnography from other qualitative research.

  4. How does ethnography compare to other HSR and policy research methods?

  5. Ease of Research Design HARD EASY • Bench Sciences • Physics • Humanities • Philosophy RCT Psychometrics Econometrics Epidemiology SEM Ethnography

  6. Interpretability of Results HARD EASY • Bench Sciences • Physics • Humanities • Philosophy Ethnography Epidemiology SEM Psychometrics Econometrics RCT

  7. Ease of Research Design Harder to Design Easier to Design DATA COLLECTION Focus grps Semi-strc iv’s Ethno- graphy Content analysis Grounded theory Ethno- graphy DATA ANALYSIS Easier to Interpret Harder to Interpret Interpretability of Results

  8. Producing qualitative research: Intrusiveness, control & scalability DATA COLLECTION Focus grps Semi-strc iv’s Ethno- graphy HIGH LOW Content analysis Grounded theory Ethno- graphy DATA ANALYSIS

  9. What are recent advances in ethnography? • None, really; ethnography is an old craft • Yet constantly contested and in turmoil Last big ‘innovation’ was post-modernism (1970s) —neither very recent nor much of an ‘advance.’ • A more relevant question: what are recent developments in the potential role for ethnography in health policy and services research?

  10. Advancing policy & practice via ethnographic understanding* • Goal: “advancing” policy & practice • Hazards of advancement: unintended consequences, ironies of good intentions, self-interest lurking behind altruism and the “public good” • By surfacing, documenting and illuminating these hazards, ethnography may allow policy to focus less myopically on improvement, perfection, efficiency, justice, happiness, health, etc. * Bosk AcademyHealth ARM 2005

  11. The need to deploy ethnography selectively • As a research method, ethnography is time-consuming and inefficient • Its findings are complex and highly contextualized, i.e. hard to digest • And once digested, these findings may not be seen as good or uplifting news • So, pick ethnographic cases (and battles) carefully

  12. Case studies • Explore the sensitive: errors in surgery or stigma in the ED (how disagreement about appropriate care shapes decision-making) • Document the significant: how doctors are trained or what is good care (when cancer MD’s introduce issue of end of life care) • Elaborate the obvious: how we die or how clinical trials recruit (why E.H.R. reminder systems stop working)

  13. Explore the sensitive:Stigma in the ED • Case study of how social stigma arises in the emergency department • Observation is only method available • Stigma arises as a seemingly inevitable product of well-designed care processes and despite the individual good intentions of providers

  14. Document the significant:What is good care • Comparative ethnography of what people consider “high quality care” in multiple cancer practices • Document that no “right” definition exists and how definitions vary by role, place, & organization • Potentially significant implications for quality reporting & pay for performance

  15. Elaborate the “obvious”:How clinical trials recruit • Clinical trials have elaborate protocols defining eligibility and institutionalized ethical standards to guide recruitment • Requirements of minority inclusion is an opportunity to “lift the hood” via ethnography • It turns out providers often can’t or don’t follow the protocols or standards • The informal & interactional often structure recruitment processes

  16. Conclusions • Ethnography is a good tool to investigate a limited class of questions and problems • This class includes several potential “growth areas” in health policy and services research, e.g. the meaning & measurement of quality, mechanisms underlying health disparities • Including projects that embrace a critical and self-reflexive mode of social analysis may potentially advance the field generally

More Related