1 / 14

Design 1 (1A)

Design 1 (1A). Motor 2. Motor 3. Arm 2. Motor 1. Arm 1. C.R. Chassis. I/O. Claw. MSA Control Board. Design 1 Comments (1A). This analysis is overly generous for a student design of the MSA No provisions for counterweights were made

sovann
Download Presentation

Design 1 (1A)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Design 1 (1A) Motor 2 Motor 3 Arm 2 Motor 1 Arm 1 C.R. Chassis I/O Claw MSA Control Board

  2. Design 1 Comments (1A) • This analysis is overly generous for a student design of the MSA • No provisions for counterweights were made • No true product weights were incorporated, only conservative estimates • Likely exceeds the true design significantly

  3. Design 2 (1A) Motor 2 Motor 3 Motor 1 Arm 2 Arm 1 I/O C.R. Chassis MSA Control Board Claw

  4. Design 2 Comments (1A) • A more reasonable design for an MSA robotic arm design • Contains arm lengths more optimized at an edge location to meet the minimum requirements • Does not incorporate a counterweight system • Closer to a true design

  5. Design 3 (1A) Motor 2 Motor 3 Motor 1 Arm 2 C.R. Arm 1 I/O Claw Chassis MSA Control Board

  6. Design 3 Comments (1A) • A more reasonable design for an MSA robotic arm design • Contains arm lengths more optimized at an edge location to meet the minimum requirements • Includes a raised servo motor and counterweight provision • Closer to a possible design

  7. Design 4 (1B) Arm 2 C.R. Arm 1 I/O Motor 2 Chassis MSA Control Board Motor 1 Claw

  8. Design 4 Comments (1B) • A more difficult design as it will be extremely difficult to control position of the end effector • Still a possible design • Reduces number of design components

  9. Design 5 (1C) Motor 1 Arm 1 I/O Arm 2 Chassis MSA Control Board Motor 2 Claw

  10. Design 5 Comments (1C) • Arm can swing either in any plane perpendicular with the ground • Reduces number of necessary motors and drive components

  11. Design 6 (1D) Motor 1 Arm 1 Motor 2 Arm 2 I/O Chassis MSA Control Board Claw

  12. Design 6 Comments (1D) • Includes a pin and slotted member at Arm 2 to allow movement • More prone to binding at surfaces • Can certainly be optimized more than this

  13. Design 7 (1E) Motor 1 Motor 2 Arm 1 C.R. I/O Chassis MSA Control Board Claw

  14. Design 7 Comments (1E) • Simplest design for number of components • Allows for simplest cg and calculations for moments • Includes the use of a counterweight for feasibility

More Related