1 / 9

Open Questions in Aviation Weather Service Provision

Open Questions in Aviation Weather Service Provision. Considerable Progress in meteorological Science Advances in Avionics and airframe design Improvements in observing technology BUT : Information to Pilots, ATC/ATM, Operations Control still based on 1950es style telegraph codes.

sorena
Download Presentation

Open Questions in Aviation Weather Service Provision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open Questions in Aviation Weather Service Provision • Considerable Progress in meteorological Science • Advances in Avionics and airframe design • Improvements in observing technology • BUT : Information to Pilots, ATC/ATM, Operations Control still based on 1950es style telegraph codes

  2. OPMET Information • METAR and TAF for international distribution • - valid for Terminal Aerodrome and 5 nm around • - mix of automated and manual observations • - half-hourly update rate for METAR, 3-hourly for TAF (Europe) • - TREND ICAO Standard, but several states are filing differences for cost reasons • - recent improvement to code to allow for sharper temporal resolution not yet universally applied by states • - lack of resolution in critical situations (RVR TREND not available, minimum ceiling in code 100ft, CAT IIIb below that value) • - fundamental difficulty in convective predictions for „strategic planning“-time frame of 2-6 hours

  3. RVR-Tendency

  4. Gap Analysis • Time Scale 2-6 hours: • - Kinematic extrapolation ineffective for short-lived phenomena • - Model forecasts suffering from inadequate assimilation of new data types (WXR, Satellite cloud top temps, soil properties) • - Very high resolution, explicit models „hyperactive“, i.e. pick up and amplify both signal and noise (realistic moisture convergence vs. Stochastic gravity wave activity) • - Multi-model, short-range ensembles promising, but still in infancy • - Interaction with topography statistically significant, dynamically difficult to model

  5. Operational weather dependence • Reduced weather minima for individual aircraft reduce exposure to „average“ weather events • Terminal Capacity reduction depending on local / national / airline regulations • Critical thresholds sometimes not well communicated and trained • Very high forecast quality and reliability needed to base critical decisions • Quality control and verification needs to be user-specific, i.e. using flexible thresholds • For economic optimisation probability densitiy required • Highest „academic“ quality not necessarily translates into operational savings • Co-operative effort needed to determine weather impact depending on atmospheric parameters , aviation technology and regulations

  6. Value-added products • With increasing traffic density, standard ICAO products not sufficient for optimised weather planning • Commercial opening for additional products • Temptation to overstate capabilities and understate problems, intransparent methodology in competitive environment • Labour-intensive services difficult to finance, automated products require in-depth user training , accompanying quality control and regular consultation • Uniformity of standards unlikely in a commercially driven environment unless WMO, ICAO and national Met Authorities are involved from the start • ISO certification helpful, but no guarantee for excellence of contents, only adherence to procedures is checked

  7. Early Identification of Weather Conflict Situations • Safety: • - Derivation of probability density functions for Meta-Impact-Variables • - Matching of 4-dimensional PDF of Meta-Impact variables with a/c vulnerability profiles and 4-dimensional projected trajectories • - Resulting in identification of „hot spots“ in 4-dimensional continuum

  8. Early Identification of Weather Conflict Situations-cont. • Efficiency: • - Extension of vulnerability concept to infrastructure (airports, airways, fleets) • - Determine critical thresholds • -Derive probability density for capacity impacting meta-variables • -Match with relative load (% of max capacity) for each part of infrastructure for time projections • Resulting „hot spots“ for delays/reroutings/canx

  9. Avoidance and mitigation • Avoidance: • - Strategic planning by CFMU, Ops control, ATM to circumnavigate safety-“hot spots“ • Reduce load around efficiency „hot spots“ by offering alternatives • Increase handling capacity (divide sectors, staffing levels etc) Mitigation: Prepare short-term alternatives Anticipate avoidance manoevres Increase awareness before „hot spot“ is entered

More Related