1 / 11

Messages Embedded in Gaze of Interface Agents: Impression Management With Agent's Gaze

Messages Embedded in Gaze of Interface Agents: Impression Management With Agent's Gaze. Atsushi Fukayama et. al. Proceedings of CHI 2002 Presentation by Kyle Johnsen. What are you talking about?.

socampo
Download Presentation

Messages Embedded in Gaze of Interface Agents: Impression Management With Agent's Gaze

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Messages Embedded in Gaze of Interface Agents: Impression Management With Agent's Gaze Atsushi Fukayama et. al. Proceedings of CHI 2002 Presentation by Kyle Johnsen

  2. What are you talking about? • The impression of a person is our image of him that is built up in our mind from various cues, such as his utterance, behavior, appearance, and reputation.

  3. What are you talking about? • From psychological studies • Gaze has the following functions in a conversation • monitoring – literal meaning of gaze (ie, someone is looking at something) • Regulatory – Control conversation flow • Expressive – convey some type of information • Length of eye contact used to maintain a comfortable level of intimacy [Argyle, Dean] • Continuous gaze highly rated in the impression measures of “liking/ evaluation” and “activity/ potency” [Argyle, Lefebvre, Cook]

  4. Hypothesis • Can an embodied agent control the impression the user has of them with just an eye gaze model?

  5. Gaze Model • Total Gaze • The percentage of time the agent looks at the user • Mean Gaze time • The mean amount of time the agent looks at the user • Gaze Points while averted • Where the agent looks when not looking directly at the user

  6. Gaze Model • Gaze Parameters Values • Amount of Gaze : • R− =0.25, R0 =0.5, R+ =0.75, R++ =1.0 • Mean Duration of Gaze : L [ms] • L− = 500, L0 = 1000, L+ = 2000 • Gaze Points while Averted : • P⊂{(x, y)|−∞≤x, y ≤∞} • P0 = {(x, y)|−1.2 ≤x, y≤1.2}, • PH = {(x, y)|−1.0 ≤ x ≤1.0, 0.7 ≤ y ≤1.1}, • PL= {(x, y)|−1.0 ≤ x ≤1.0, −0.9 ≤ y ≤−1.3}, • PR= {(x, y)|−2.0 ≤ x ≤−1.2, −0.4 ≤ y ≤0.4

  7. extrovert – introvert considerate – inconsiderate unassured –assured coordinative – exclusive cold– warm strong – weak selfish – responsible strict – tolerant successful – unsuccessful thoughtless – thoughtful attractive – unattractive careless– careful friendly – unfriendly unfaithful – faithful rude –respectful close – distant stubborn – flexible sociable – unsociable attentive – inattentive lazy – diligent Variables

  8. Factor Analysis • Factor 1 (Friendliness) • friendly(0.81), warm (0.77), sociable(0.75), tolerant (0.67), flexible (0.58), attentive (0.57), coordinative (0.56) • Factor 2 (Dominance) • assured (0.84), strong (0.83), successful (0.70), responsible (0.61), careful (0.59)

  9. Results • R values closer to R0 yield higher ratings in impression measures related to “like/dislike”. • Partially Supported • Larger L values yield higher ratings in impression measures related to “potency”. • Partially Supported

  10. Results • L values smaller than L0 yield lower ratings in impression measures related to “strong”. • Supported • PL yields higher ratings in impression measures related to “warm”. • Not Supported • PL yields lower ratings in impression measures related to “strong”. • Supported

  11. Conclusions • Gaze parameters can induce impressions reliably using a simple gaze model • What can we do with this? • Can we fit the user to this model so the avatar can form an impression of them? • Can head orientation be used instead of eye gaze as a rough estimate?

More Related