1 / 18

Economic Assessment Results

This assessment analyzes the economic effects of different scenarios on agricultural income, including compliance with cross-compliance standards. It examines the impacts on market effects, cost implications, and regional income effects.

smithnancy
Download Presentation

Economic Assessment Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Markus Kempen Economic Assessment Results

  2. Outline Scenarios Definition Agricultural Income Effects Main Market Effects Overview on Cost Impacts Conclusion/Discussion Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  3. Analyzed Scenarios Main Scenarios: Baseline 2005: • Technically: CAPRI “base year” • All measures implemented in base period 2005-2009 • Compliance varies among SMR directives( GAEC issues and countries (70% - 100%); on average about ~90% • No implementation in Bulgaria and Romania • Violation of measures as estimated/observed in base year Zero Compliance: • Hypothetical situation without CC related measures • Mainly used as comparison scenario Compliance100pct: • Assuming full compliance with all measures Variations of Compliance100pct for Sensitivity Analysis: Cost200: cost doubled Cost500: cost increased by factor 5 Crops000Animals200: no cost for crops, animals doubled Crops200Animals000: no cost for animals, crops doubled Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  4. Income Effects (EU27) Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  5. Income Effects (EU27) Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  6. Income Effects – Sensitivity of Results Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  7. Regional Income Effects Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  8. Summary - Income • Minor effects comparing baseline situation (about 90% compliance) and full compliance (100%) • Cost related to CC standards are almost equal to drop in agricultural income • Agricultural Income decreases compared to a situation without regulation ( ~ -3%) • CC standards costare significantly lower than premium payments • No significant difference between crops and animal production ( … with respect to income) • Output value of animal products goes up with increasing cost (market effects can partially compensate) • Output value of crops slightly decreasing (at most stable) • Income drop homogeneous among regions [-5%, -1%] Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  9. Market effects for selected activities/products Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  10. Regional Production Effects LU per ha Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  11. Summary – Market/Production Effects Animals: • Overall decrease in herds; • Increasing prices almost compensate CC cost (… but not loss of production) • Decreases in prevailing intensive regions (… due cost related to manure application) • Dairy sector almost not affected (quota!) Crops: • Cereal production increasing (“best alternative”); • Cereal prices go down due decreasing (feed) demand and increasing acreage • Additional cereal production is processed to bio fuels (at lower prices) • “demanding” crops go down, costs can be partially compensated by price effects) Fallow Land: • Set aside and fallow land decrease (due GAEC enforcing minimum maintenance) • Assumptions on cost of fallow land are crucial! Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  12. Cost Implication at EU level Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  13. Regional Cost Implication Total cost per UAA Animal related cost per LU Crop related cost per UAA Nitrate Directive Animal Welfare Directive(s) Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  14. Summary - Cost Cost: • Animal production more affected then crops • Dir 4 (crops and animals) and Dir16-18 (only animals) major cost drivers • Significant regional difference in cost effects (especially for animals) Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  15. Conclusion/Discussion • CC Cost are not compensated by market effects • Divergent effects in Crop and animal sector • Public service payments might need to be targeted more strongly to livestock sectors (also in the light of important positive and negative externalities to environment by these sectors) • Maybe accompanying measure needed on maintenance of fallow land level? Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  16. Animal Welfare Minimum legal standard Minimum legal Standard Dairy cows Suckler cows Calves Pig fattening Estimated on farm condition Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  17. Animal Welfare Criteria Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

  18. Summary – Animal Welfare • Based on Animal Needs Index (Cattle and Pigs) • Minimum legal standard based on EU and national legislation • Estimated on farm condition extrapolated from own field study (Austria, 60 farms) • Overall: On farm condition above minimum standard ( … but several standards “binding”) Cross Compliance Assessment Tool

More Related