1 / 29

Poverty Reduction and Ecological Resilience through Genuine Development

Poverty Reduction and Ecological Resilience through Genuine Development. Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont USA jon.erickson@uvm.edu • www.uvm.edu/~jdericks/.

smithlisa
Download Presentation

Poverty Reduction and Ecological Resilience through Genuine Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Poverty ReductionandEcological ResiliencethroughGenuine Development Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont USA jon.erickson@uvm.edu • www.uvm.edu/~jdericks/

  2. Poverty Reduction and Ecological Resilience through Genuine Development • Legacy of the Washington Consensus • Income Convergence or Cumulative Causation • Genuine Development Alternative • Strategies toward Genuine Development • Implications on Retooling Macroeconomic Policy

  3. GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE Harry Dexter White and John Maynard Keynes Legacy of the Washington Consensus • Bretton Woods mission drift

  4. Legacy of the Washington Consensus • Consensus of IMF, World Bank, and US Treasury • Fiscal Austerity • Privatization • Market Liberalization • Application of the Consensus • Top-down • Industrial / resource extraction oriented • Export-led • Theory behind the Consensus  National growth would lead to trickle down development

  5. Income Convergence orCumulative Causation • Kaldor-Kuznets-Solow consensus • Marginal propensity to save of the wealthy • Inequality lead to growth Income gap between rich and poor  Greater incentives  Greater labor productivity • Growth-Inequality development paths  Evidence from US and UK  Growth path eventually leads to greater equality • Income convergence between nations due to decreasing marginal returns

  6. http://www.cr1.dircon.co.uk/TB/2/dreturns.htm

  7. Income Convergence orCumulative Causation • Cumulative Causation • Possibility of increasing returns (Smith, Marx, Young, Myrdal) • Uneven development • Future development depends more on past investment (path dependency) In the normal case a change does not call forth countervailing changes but, instead, supporting changes, which move the system in the same direction as the first change, but much further. Because of such circular causation a social process tends to become cumulative and often to gather speed at an accelerating rate. (Myrdal, 1957, p. 13)

  8. Income Convergence orCumulative Causation • Theoretical critique • Nelson (1956): Low-level equilibrium traps • Arrow (1962): Learning by doing • Romer (1986): Growth rates as function of attained level of development • Arthur (1999): Technology lock-ins • Galor (1996) and Quah (1996): Growth clubs

  9. Income Convergence orCumulative Causation • Empirical critique • Persson and Tabellini (1994): Inequality as impediment to growth • Benabou (1996): Inequality stunts national growth rates • Aghion et al. (1999): Redistribution towards equity would increase domestic investment and stimulate growth • Skott and Auerbach (1995): Low income countries not catching up. • Bourgninon and Morrison (2002): Income divergence at best decelerated over last 50 years. Global gini has increased by 30%.

  10. Income Convergence orCumulative Causation • Empirical critique • Barro (2000): Poor countries have had lower growth rates. Exceptions due to human capital investment. • Easterly and Levine (1997): Low income countries have similar characteristics such as low levels of schooling, political instability, and insufficient infrastructure.

  11. Population 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Income 82.7% 11.7% 2.3% 1.9% 1.4% Growth as Cumulative Causation 1950  1992 Over 5x increase in global output Nearly 12x increase in world trade 1950 – Haves 30x over the Have Nots 1989 – Haves 60x over the Have Nots

  12. Genuine Development Alternative • Genuine Development Indicators • Genuine Progress Indicator • Human Development Index • UN Millennium development goals: • Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger • Achieve universal primary education • Promote gender equality and empower women • Reduce child mortality • Improve maternal health • Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases • Ensure environmental sustainability • Develop a global partnership for development.

  13. Genuine Development Alternative

  14. Genuine Development Alternative

  15. Genuine Development Alternative

  16. Genuine Development Alternative

  17. Genuine Development Alternative

  18. e i r e t s , n t s r e n t s , , e p r o g f i t a s ( W 1 ) F actor services Goods Household Fir ms (production g n i d n e p S t n Go v er nment e m T n a r e v x ( 2 o e s ) G ( 2 ) S ) a 3 v ( i n t n g e s m t ( s e 3 ) v n I Financial mar k ets I P e ) r 4 m s o ( n n a l c o n s t i o u m p p o r t s ( ) 5 5 ) ( s t r o p x E Other countr ies Genuine Development Alternative • Ecological economic capital assets approach

  19. Genuine Development Alternative • Ecological economic capital assets approach

  20. Genuine Development Alternative • Ecological economic capital assets approach

  21. Genuine Development Alternative • Ecological economic capital assets approach

  22. Genuine Development Alternative • Genuine Savings

  23. Genuine Development Alternative • Natural Resource Curse Sachs and Warner, 2001

  24. Strategies toward Genuine Development • Reversing the resource curse through investing royalties in directed poverty eradication • Investing in natural capital through payments for ecosystem services • Capturing the carbon dividend • Human and social capital investment • National debt for international services • Regional economic development

  25. Retooling Macroeconomic Policy • Fiscal Policies that invest broadly in natural, social, human, and built capital. • Monetary Policies that expand the role of local currency, increase internal velocity of money and plug the leaks of regional economies, favor domestic investment opportunities for long-term economic capacity. • Trade Policies that balance self-sufficiency and sectoral diversity with comparative advantage and export opportunities, and restrict capital mobility so that comparative advantages remain.

More Related