1 / 40

#HowisTHATfair?

This presentation explores the decline in clinic and community engagement among Millennials in the criminal justice community. It discusses the definition of Millennials, their characteristics and influences, and proposes strategies to engage them in a meaningful way.

smaestas
Download Presentation

#HowisTHATfair?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. #HowisTHATfair? Goading Hesitant Millennials into Meaningful Engagement in the Criminal Justice Community 2016 AALS Conference on Clinical Legal Education Baltimore, Maryland May 1, 2016

  2. Objectives • Disclaimer • Team Selection • Need to Goad? • Define “Millennial” • Accuracy of definition • Influences on the Generation • Categorization • Case Studies • Brain Storm

  3. Team Selection • Count off • Group up • Introductions within group (3 minutes) • Years of clinical teaching • Criminal or other • Most embarrassing clinical moment • Etc, etc, etc

  4. Need to Goad • Decline in clinic enrollment • Decline in ability by some students • Decline in clinic engagement by many students • Decline in community engagement by almost all students • 2012  present • What happened?

  5. Millennial Defined • Digital Natives – DOB 1981 – 1991. • Approximately 40 million strong • Seek maximum flexibility in all aspects of life • Thrive on maximum feedback – 80% want daily positive feedback • Require meaningful rewards for minimal accomplishments • Generally more open-minded

  6. UM Monitoring the Future UCLA Freshman Study • More civically and politically disengaged • More focused on materialistic values • Less emphasis on self-acceptance, group affiliation and community. • Less concerned about helping the larger community than were GenX and Boomers at the same age. • N = 9,000,000 -- 2012

  7. UM Monitoring the Future UCLA Freshman Study • Is being wealthy important? • 45% Boomers; 70% GenX; 75% Millennial • Do you keep up with politics? • 50% Boomers; 39% GenX; 35% Millennial • Do you have a meaningful philosophy of life? • 73% Boomers; 55% GenX; 45% Millennial

  8.   Millennial MomentumMichael Hais- 2011 • “…..They were sheltered in many ways, with a lot of high expectations for what they should achieve. Individual failure is difficult to accept when confronted with a sense that you're an important person and expected to achieve. Even though, in most instances, it's not their fault — the economy collapsed just as many of them were getting out of college and coming of age — that does lead to a greater sense of stress."

  9. 2012 American Psychological Association Stress Study • More stress, depression and anxiety • Top stress sources are work (cited by 76%), money (73%) and relationships (59%) • 39% say their stress has increased in the past year; 52% say stress has kept them awake at night in the past month. • More than any other age group, they report being told by a health care provider that they have either depression or an anxiety disorder.  • N = 2020

  10. Live Science, 2013 Douglas Main • “They have also been described in positive ways. They are generally regarded as being more open-minded, and more supportive of gay rights and equal rights for minorities. Other positive adjectives to describe them include confident, self-expressive, liberal, upbeat and receptive to new ideas and ways of living.”

  11. Current Status • Decreased sense of actual community • Increased sense of virtual community • Open minded and minority supportive • Resistant to direction • Confident • Negative critique = catastrophe • Enhanced level of outcome frustration

  12. Generational Influences • Education Reform • Social Change • Technology

  13. 1981

  14. 1983

  15. 1986

  16. 1989

  17. 1991 - 1993

  18. 1996

  19. 1999

  20. 2001

  21. No Child Left Behind • Roll-out to commence 2002 – 2003 school year • By the 2005-06 school year, states were required to begin testing students in grades 3-8 annually in reading and mathematics. • By 2007-08, they had to tests students in science at least once in elementary, middle, and high school. • States were required to bring all students to the “proficient level” on state tests by the 2013-14 school year. • “More rigorous and measureable standards” in order to receive federal funding

  22. Roll-out to Law School • 2013 JD matriculates  7th grade • 2014 JD matriculates  6th grade • 2015 JD matriculates  5th grade • 2016 JD matriculates  4th grade

  23. Social Change • AYSO • Blue Ribbons/No Score Games • Social Promotions • Maintain Peer Grouping • Political Polarization • Lack of Meaningful Hero’s • Open Hostility at Highly Visible Levels of Government • Increasing Family Destabilization • ‘nuff said • Information Deluge 

  24. Technology

  25. Increased Connectivity • Internet • Immediate access to information • No library interaction • Cell Technology • Telecommunications • Texting • Social Media • Story Sharing • Story Liking • Decreased in-person interaction

  26. Native Habitat

  27. Suggestions • Recognize the problem change • Different needs = different solutions • Accept the new norm • Incentive based engagement • Enhanced use of narrative • Empathic teaching • Redefine success

  28. Crime Scene

  29. Christian Gonzales • Shooting - Client shot and auto full of holes • Indicted – Witness Intimidation, Witness Harassment, PSMV • BCX - Just because we can….. • Motion - Seek to dismiss indictment • Ruling - Denied – Court: “How about we set this for a quick bench?”

  30. Humphrey Bunch #1 • 06 CR 10047 – Residential Burglary • 2006 – JW/PG/FG 8 years IDOC (w/i 60 days of arraignment) • 2006 – Appointed to file mtn w/d PG • 2007 – Mtn for retrospective BCX – trans to CCDOC RTU – unfit • 2007- Remand DHS pending restoration • 2008 – Restoration, PG w/d, back to CCDOC RTU • 2008 – plea time served – 830 days (750 in mental health facilites)

  31. Humphrey Bunch #2 • 09 CR 11446 – Residential Burglary • 2009 – found and filed app, req BCX sanity • 2010 – insane at the time • 2010 – reduced theft, MHP 24 month, Thresholds placement, 310 days • High student engagement throughout case

  32. Humphrey Bunch #3 • 13 CR 20900 – Residential Burglary • 2015 – Find and file appearance, req BCX sanity and MHC eval • 2016 – PG att burg, 24 months MHC probation w/ in- patient – 829 days • As of 4/28/16, medication compliant and meeting all goals • No student assigned to case

  33. Empathic Teaching • Who am I? • Am I in their shoes? • What are my goals – personal and student? • Is my teaching relevant?

  34. Me! • Excited about role? • Engaged? • Empowering? • Credible? • Connected? • Supportive?

  35. Their Shoes • See through the eyes of the beginner • Fear? Hope? Anxiety? Joy? • Assessment of needs • Scheduling • Transportation • Awareness of learning style • Visual? Auditory? Kinesthetic? • Integration of entire section • Making connections

  36. Goals • My goals • Case management • Student development • System interaction • Student goals • Develop critical thinking • Enhance problem solving skills • Create professional persona • Search for career opportunities

  37. Relevant Teaching • Real world application • Client narrative • Background • Why……? • Student/attorney narrative • Experience • Career development • ARDC • Indictment

  38. Advantages • Creation of neural activity • Thoroughness of discussion • Connection with students • Flexibility in problem solving • Walk the walk

  39. Brain Storming • Your examples of life and professional experience converted into a meaningful and productive narrative.

  40. Thank You! Rachel Moran Clinical Teaching Fellow University of Denver Sturm College of Law Daniel Coyne Clinical Professor of Law Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law

More Related