half loaded
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
“HALF LOADED”

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 16

“HALF LOADED” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 66 Views
  • Uploaded on

“HALF LOADED”. Team Members Derek Brzezinski Keri Etheredge Angie Murray Andrew Walther. AGENDA. Team Introductions Problem Statement Research Methodology Results Conclusions and Recommendations Limitations Questions and Answers. PROBLEM STATEMENT. “Half Loaded”

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '“HALF LOADED”' - skyler


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
half loaded

“HALF LOADED”

Team Members

Derek Brzezinski Keri Etheredge

Angie Murray Andrew Walther

agenda
AGENDA
  • Team Introductions
  • Problem Statement
  • Research Methodology
  • Results
  • Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Limitations
  • Questions and Answers
problem statement
PROBLEM STATEMENT
  • “Half Loaded”
    • An evaluation of the UH O.R.P. providers
  • Current Status
    • 15 O.R.P.s with contact name and phone number listed
    • 90 days to enroll or permanently forfeit option to participate
    • No easy way to compare service offerings of various O.R.P.s
problem statement1
PROBLEM STATEMENT
  • Current Status (cont.)
research methodology
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  • Contacted each O.R.P. to obtain key information about service offering
  • Each team member used same pre-selected set of questions
  • Data was compiled in database to compare providers
research methodology1
Data Collected

Services provided

Mutual fund families offered

Percent of eligible faculty that use provider

Avg. Morningstar rating

Avg. expense ratio

Loads/Fees/Commissions

Sales contests/Prizes

Advisor service/Fees

Advisor compensation

Advisor investment practices

Contact Experience

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
results
RESULTS
  • 1647 Faculty and Staff Eligible for O.R.P.s 1400 are Enrolled in Program (85%)
  • Most Providers Offer Mutual Funds that are Rated by Morningstar
  • Some Providers Offer Fixed and Variable Sub-annuities that are Not Ratable through Morningstar
results1
RESULTS
  • Ranges of Results
results2
Morningstar rating >3.3  <3.0 

Exp Ratio < 1.0  >1.35 

Loads/Fees None  > 4.0 

Mand Adv Fee No  Yes 

RESULTS
results3
RESULTS
  • UH Employees Top 4 Selected O.R.P.s
results4
RESULTS
  • Surprising Results
    • The Pioneer Group admitted offering sales prizes
    • Chase and Lincoln National Life Charge Surrender/Withdrawal Fees Beginning at 6% and Declining Over Time
    • ING/Aetna sent our questions to their legal group and never responded
    • 50% of Providers have Less Than 2% Participation
    • 20% of Providers have 65% Participation
conclusions recommendations
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
  • O.R.P. Contact List Out of Date
    • Two providers on list no longer offer service
    • One provider changed company names
    • No web sites or email addresses provided
    • Many incorrect phone numbers
  • Based on Current Information Available, Employees are Likely to Decide Fate of Retirement Account Based on Proximity and Advisor Personalities
  • Properly Evaluating Each Provider With Available Information Would Take Significant Time and Effort
conclusions recommendations1
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
  • No Correlation Exists Between Providers with High % of Clientele and High Expense Ratios or Fees
  • Fidelity Investments, T. Rowe Price and TIAA-CREF are the recommended providers
  • The Pioneer Group, Merrill Lynch and American Express are not recommended due to high fees and low ratings
conclusions recommendations2
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Provide Information on UH Web Site
    • Current Contact List for Each O.R.P. with Web Site and Email Address
    • Simple Glossary of Key Terms
    • List of Generic Questions and Employee Could Use to Shop for an O.R.P.
    • Simple Table Comparing Each O.R.P.
      • Services Provided
      • Avg Morning Star Rating
      • Avg Expense Ratios
      • Avg Loads/Fees/Commissions
    • Link to List of All Fund Provided with Key Data For Each Fund (Morningstar Rating, Expense Ratio, Loads)
limitations
LIMITATIONS
  • Short time frame limited ability to contact all O.R.P.s and to verify all data
  • O.R.P.s that Offered Annuity Funds Were Difficult to Rate and Compare
  • Data presented may change and may not be valid in the future
questions and answers
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Questions and Answers

ad