1 / 28

Frictional Cooling

Frictional Cooling. Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell + Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv University). How to reduce beam Emmittance by 10 6 ?  6D,N = 1.7 10 -10 (  m) 3. Summer Students: Emily Alden

skirk
Download Presentation

Frictional Cooling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Frictional Cooling Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell + Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv University) How to reduce beam Emmittance by 106? 6D,N = 1.7 10-10 (m)3 Summer Students: Emily Alden Christos Georgiou Daniel Greenwald Laura Newburgh Yujin Ning Will Serber Inna Shpiro

  2. Frictional Cooling Nuclear scattering, excitation, charge exchange, ionization Ionization stops, muon too slow • Bring muons to a kinetic energy (T) where dE/dx increases with T • Constant E-field applied to muons resulting in equilibrium energy • Big issue – how to maintain efficiency • First studied by Kottmann et al., PSI 1/2 from ionization

  3. Problems/comments: • large dE/dx @ low kinetic energy  low average density (gas) • Apply E  B to get below the dE/dx peak • m+has the problem of Muonium formation s(Mm) dominates over e-strippingin all gases except He • m-has the problem of Atomic capture s small below electron binding energy, but not known • Slow muons don’t go far before decaying d = 10 cm sqrt(T ) T in eV so extract sideways (E  B )

  4. Frictional Cooling: particle trajectorySome obvious statements? • In 1tm dm=10cm*sqrt{T(eV)} • keep d small at low T • reaccelerate quickly ** Using continuous energy loss

  5. Phase rotation sections Cooling cells • Full MARS target simulation, optimized for low energy muon yield: 2 GeV protons on Cu with proton beam transverse to solenoids (capture low energy pion cloud). • He gas is used for m+,H2 for m-. There is a nearly uniform 5T Bz field everywhere, and Ex =5 MeV/m in gas cell region • Electronic energy loss treated as continuous, individual nuclear scattering taken into account since these yield large angles. Not to scale !!

  6. Incorporate scattering cross sections into the cooling program • Born Approx. for T>2KeV • Classical Scattering T<2KeV • Include m- capture cross section using calculations of Cohen (Phys. Rev. A. Vol 62 022512-1) • Difference in m+ & m- energy loss rates at dE/dx peak • Due to extra processes charge exchange • Barkas Effect parameterized data from Agnello et. al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 371) • Only used for the electronic part of dE/dx

  7. Yields & Emittance Look at muons coming out of 11m cooling cell region after initial reacceleration. Yield: approx 0.002  per 2GeV proton after cooling cell. Need to improve yield by factor 3 or more. Emittance: rms x = 0.015 m y = 0.036 m z = 30 m ( actually ct) Px = 0.18 MeV Py = 0.18 MeV Pz = 4.0 MeV 6D,N = 5.7 10-11 (m)3 6D,N = 1.7 10-10 (m )3

  8. Problems/Things to investigate… • Extraction of ms through window in gas cell • Must be very thin to pass low energy ms • Must be reasonably gas tight • Can we apply high electric fields in gas cell without breakdown (large number of free electrons, ions) ? Plasma generation  screening of field. • Reacceleration & bunch compression for injection into storage ring • The m- capture cross section depends very sensitively on kinetic energy & falls off sharply for kinetic energies greater than e- binding energy. NO DATA – simulations use theoretical calculation • +…

  9. RAdiological Research Accelerator Facility • Perform TOF measurements with protons • 2 detectors START/STOP • Thin entrance/exit windows for a gas cell • Some density of He gas • Electric field to establish equilibrium energy • NO B field so low acceptance • Look for a bunching in time • Can we cool protons?

  10.  4 MeV p

  11. Contains 20nm window Accelerating grid Si detector To MCP Proton beam Gas cell Vacuum chamber

  12. Initial conclusions: no obvious cooling peak, but very low acceptance due to lack of magnetic field. Use data to tune simulations. Redo experiment with a solenoidal magnetic field.

  13. Lab situated at MPI-WHI in Munich

  14. Future Plans • Frictional cooling tests at MPI with 5T Solenoid, a source • Study gas breakdown in high E,B fields • R&D on thin windows • Beam tests with muons to measure  capture cross section • -+H  H+ e+’s • muon initially captured in high n orbit, • then cascades down to n=1. • Transition n=2n=1 releases 2.2 KeV x-ray. Si drift detector Developed my MPI HLL

  15. Summary of Frictional Cooling • Works below the Ionization Peak • Possibility to capture both signs • Cooling factors O(106) or more? • Still unanswered questions being worked on but work is encouraging. Nevis Labs work on m-scapture MPI lab for additional questions

  16. Frictional Cooling: stop the m • High energy m’s travel a long distance to stop • High energy m’s take a long time to stop Start with low initial muon momenta

  17. Motion in Transverse Plane • Assuming Ex=constant Lorentz angle

  18. Simulations Improvements • Incorporate scattering cross sections into the cooling program • Born Approx. for T>2KeV • Classical Scattering T<2KeV • Include m- capture cross section using calculations of Cohen (Phys. Rev. A. Vol 62 022512-1)

  19. Scattering Cross Sections • Scan impact parameter q(b) to get ds/dq from which one can get lmean free path • Use screened Coulomb Potential (Everhart et. al. Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) 1287) • Simulate all scatters q>0.05 rad

  20. Barkas Effect • Difference in m+ & m- energy loss rates at dE/dx peak • Due to extra processes charge exchange • Barkas Effect parameterized data from Agnello et. al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 371) • Only used for the electronic part of dE/dx

  21. Target Study Cu & W, Ep=2GeV, target 0.5cm thick

  22. Target System • cool m+ & m- at the same time • calculated new symmetric magnet with gap for target

  23. Target & Drift Optimize yield • Maximize drift length for m yield • Some p’s lost in Magnet aperture

  24. Phase Rotation • First attempt simple form • Vary t1,t2 & Emax for maximum low energy yield

More Related