1 / 26

Safety Partnership for US-2

Safety Partnership for US-2. Michigan Traffic Safety Summit 2007. S.A.B.R.E. S peed A ggressive Driving B elts R ural E nforcement. Why the Concern on US-2?. History of serious traffic crashes on US-2 Public perception of an unsafe highway Michigan Strategic Highway Safety Plan

sissy
Download Presentation

Safety Partnership for US-2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Safety Partnership for US-2 Michigan Traffic Safety Summit 2007

  2. S.A.B.R.E. SpeedAggressive DrivingBeltsRuralEnforcement

  3. Why the Concern on US-2? • History of serious traffic crashes on US-2 • Public perception of an unsafe highway • Michigan Strategic Highway Safety Plan Reduce to 1.0 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled by 2008

  4. How it all Began… • Construction of Passing Relief Lanes to increase safe passing • MDOT • 2003-2004 Passing Relief Lane Study east of Rapid River to increase safe passing • MDOT (OHSP) • Study by Wayne State in 2005 to determine types and cause of crashes along US-2 (alcohol and weather not a factor) • 2005 US-2 Safety Partnership

  5. Partners • County Sheriff Departments (Mackinac, Schoolcraft, Delta) • Local Chambers of Commerce (Mackinac and Schoolcraft County) • Local Police Departments (St. Ignace, Manistique) • Michigan Center for Truck Safety • MDOT (Region, Newberry TSC, & Escanaba TSC) • MSP (St. Ignace, Newberry, Manistique, Gladstone Posts, Motor Carrier and O.H.S.P.) • Upper Peninsula Governor’s Office • Upper Peninsula Tourism Council

  6. Goal • Increase safe driving habits through the four Es of highway safety: • Enforcement • Engineering • Education • Emergency Response • Decrease speed, aggressive driving and severe crashes

  7. Making it come together • 2005 - Monthly planning sessions • Oct-May • MDOT, MSP, OHSP • 2006 - Monthly status sessions • June-Sept • All partners

  8. Enforcement Operations • Developed 16 MSP Enforcement Zones on US-2 from Rapid River to St. Ignace • Setup “Wolfpack” Operation with 3 patrol cars and one Sergeant (unmarked car) running Lidar • 2 locations, one on east end and one on west end of US-2 • Ran operation from 10am-6pm. Would break, run freelance, set up again at different location • MSP and Local Enforcement along US-2 also ran directed patrols on unscheduled dates.

  9. Enforcement Operations(Continued) • 2005 • 22 dates, May 15-Sept 15 • 12 dates were funded by overtime (382 hours from OHSP and 98 from MSP) utilizing Tprs. from St. Ignace, Newberry, Manistique, and Gladstone • 10 dates were “Extra Patrols” utilizing above posts plus Tprs. From Sault Ste. Marie, Munisng and Negaunee (non-overtime) • 2006 • 36 dates, May 1-Oct 31 (extended it a month) • 10 dates funded by overtime(384 hours from OHSP and 96 from MSP) • 26 dates were “Extra Patrols” (non-overtime)

  10. Enforcement Operations(Continued) • 2007 • 22 dates, May 5-Sept 14 • 14 dates funded by overtime (336 hours from OHSP and 112 from MSP) utilizing Tprs. from St. Ignace, Newberry, and Manistique • 13 dates to be “Extra Patrols” utilizing above posts plus Tprs. From Sault Ste. Marie, Munisng and Negaunee (non-overtime) • Not running “Wolfpack” and utilizing 2 cars on each end instead of 3 for freelance operation • Operation will still run from 10a-6p

  11. Engineering • 2005 • “Headlights On For Safety” signs (4) • Passing relief lane signs: • “Passing Lane X Miles, Next Passing Lane X Miles” • “X Passing Lanes in next X Miles” • Additional 55 mph and increased to Freeway size • Changeable Message Sign west of St. Ignace • Reviewed and updated passing sight distance in No Passing Zones • Shoulder rumble strips - Gladstone to Rapid River

  12. Engineering • 2006 • Radar Sign installation at St. Ignace • “US-2 is NOT a Freeway, Drive Safely”

  13. Engineering • 2007 • Increased letter size and Clearview font • Shoulder Rumble Strips - FF Hwy 13 to M-183 • Additional Passing Lane on US-2 • “Maintain Speed, Allow Safe Passing” for 3 prls

  14. Education • 2005 • 100,000 Placemats & 10,000 Flyers • Banners placed along US-2 • Public Service Announcements • Media Event for Kick off (St. Ignace and Rapid River) • Combined effort with other campaigns • Click it or ticket • You drink, you drive, you lose • Naubinway Townhall Meeting

  15. Education • 2006 • 60,000 Placemats • Banners placed along US-2 • Public Service Announcements • Media Event for Kick off (St. Ignace and Rapid River) • Combined effort with other campaigns • Click it or ticket • You drink, you drive, you lose • Plaques for the back of trucks

  16. TruckPlaque

  17. Measuring the Results…. • Enforcement Statistics • Crash Data • Speed Studies

  18. 2005 Enforcement Statistics • Enforcement Contacts: 3,503 • Traffic Stops: 2,889 • OWI Arrests: 7 • Other Alcohol Arrests: 14 • Speed Citations: 1,930 • Other Citations: 265 • Verbal Warnings: 1,198 • Seat Belt Citations: 56 • Child Restraint Citations: 5 • Felony Arrests: 5 • Misdemeanor/Fugitive Arrests: 23 • Total Operation Hours 2,011

  19. 2006 Enforcement Statistics • Enforcement Contacts: 3,035 • Traffic Stops: 2,595 • OWI Arrests: 5 • Other Alcohol Arrests: 9 • Speed Citations: 1,743 • Other Citations: 175 • Verbal Warnings: 1,046 • Seat Belt Citations: 34 • Child Restraint Citations: 3 • Felony Arrests: 8 • Misdemeanor/Fugitive Arrests: 15 • Total Operation Hours 1,966

  20. Crash Data • Lane departures • Head on • Rear end • Side swipe • Dry pavement and day light hours • Alcohol was not a major contributor • Human factors • Fall asleep • Aggressive passing • Speed

  21. Fatal Crashes from 1996 to 2006

  22. 2005 Speed Study Data for 85th Percentile • Pre – Operation • 2 lane section of road • 85th percentile speed = 65 mph • 4 lane passing relief • 85th percentile speed = 67 mph • Post – Operation • 2 lane section of road • 85th percentile speed = 64 mph • 4 lanes passing relief • 85th percentile speed = 65 mph • Observed speed reduction of 1 - 2 mph.

  23. 2006 Speed Study Data for 85th Percentile • Pre – Operation • 2 lane section of road • 85th percentile speed = 64 mph • 4 lane passing relief • 85th percentile speed = 65 mph • Post – Operation • 2 lane section of road • 85th percentile speed = 64 mph • 4 lanes passing relief • 85th percentile speed = 66 mph • Consistent with 2005 post operation results

  24. FUTURE OF SABRE -Region Wide Implementation- • Six additional “Headlights On For Safety” signs at border crossings • Shoulder Rumble Strips • Passing Sight Distance Reviews • Attempt to run SABRE on other stretches of roadway (US-41 Negaunee, M-28 Munising, US-2 Iron Mountain)

More Related