1 / 27

“Overnight Activities of Medical Students On Call: Is it really educational?”

“Overnight Activities of Medical Students On Call: Is it really educational?”. Jaron McMullin, B.S. Rebecca Greenband, B.S. Raymond Price, M.D. Leigh Neumayer, M.D., MS Division of General Surgery, University of Utah. Background. Healthcare is shifting from inpatient to outpatient

sinead
Download Presentation

“Overnight Activities of Medical Students On Call: Is it really educational?”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Overnight Activities of Medical Students On Call: Is it really educational?” Jaron McMullin, B.S. Rebecca Greenband, B.S. Raymond Price, M.D. Leigh Neumayer, M.D., MS Division of General Surgery, University of Utah

  2. Background • Healthcare is shifting from inpatient to outpatient • Traditional inpatient clerkships have been slow to change • Surgery, medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, OB/GYN • Students spend up to every third night in the hospital

  3. Documenting Student Activities: Self Report vs. Observer Report • Cook, 1992 • Correlation of 0.86 between observer records and student journals • 25 students observed for 59.25 total hours No other efforts to validate self-report

  4. Past Efforts to Document Student Activities • Self-report via diaries and/or questionnaires • Libbin, 2003; Bahn, 2003; Millikan, 2001; Murray, 2001; Lawrence, 1994; Haken, 1988 and others • Both self report and observer report • Cook, 1992; La Palio, 1983 None offer a breakdown of overnight call activities and whether they are educational

  5. Study Objectives • Compare self-report to an objective third-party observer • Determine how students spend their time on overnight call • Educational • Non-educational • Personal

  6. Methods: Study Approval • Approval granted by • University of Utah Health Sciences Center (UUHSC) IRB • Intermountain Health Care Human Subjects Committee

  7. Methods: Participant Eligibility • Students on the required 6 week third year surgery clerkship were recruited • Students rotating where overnight call is assigned, either UUHSC Hospital or Latter-day Saints Hospital, were eligible. • Students at either the Veterans’ Affairs or Primary Children’s Hospitals do not take overnight call and were not enrolled

  8. Methods: Recruitment • Volunteering students • Gave informed consent • Were randomized to one of two groups: self-report or shadow • Were to return journal forms upon completion

  9. Methods: Journals • Participants kept 1, 2, or 3 journals of ~24 hours each • Wednesdays were not included because they are a scheduled didactic day

  10. Methods: Journals • Weekend “days” • 7am Saturday until 7am Sunday • 7am Sunday until 7am Monday • Weekday journals • Started at the time the student arrived at hospital • Completed at 7am the following morning • Shadowed students were overtly followed by one of two trained observers • 24 hours on weekends • 6pm to 7am on weekdays

  11. Methods: Activity Definition • Educational:patient care activities related to educational objectives (working up a patient, actively participating in procedures, reading surgery-related literature and/or texts, etc.); • Non-educational:patient care activities unrelated to educational objectives (such as gathering information for residents, finding radiographs, etc.); • Personal:personal care (sleeping, showering, eating etc.).

  12. Methods: Analysis • Calculated proportion of time that was Educational, Non-educational, or Personal • Students’ weekday journals (before 6pm) served as a baseline of educational activity

  13. Method: Analysis • T-tests compared student weekday journals to • Weeknight • Weekend days • Weekend nights • Paired t-tests compared student journals to concomitant observer journals • Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing; a p-value of <0.005 was considered significant

  14. Results: Recruitment • 34 students of 74 eligible students rotating between May, 2004 and February, 2005 • gave informed consent • were randomized to one of two groups: self-report or shadow • 5 students (15%), all self-report, withdrew or didn’t turn in journals despite multiple reminders

  15. Results: Journals • 29 students completed logs • 16 students shadowed at night; 13 were not followed • 68 days and 70 nights of student journals • >1600 hours of journal compiled and analyzed • 27 weeknights, 11 weekend (24 hour) days of observer journals • 615 hours of journal compiled and analyzed

  16. Results: Educational Student vs. Shadow

  17. Results: Non-educational Student vs. Shadow

  18. Results: Personal Student vs. Shadow

  19. Results: Comparisons between Student Groups and with Observer Journals • Shift comparisons between Shadowed and Self-report student groups showed NO significant differences • Observed Students versus Observer showed NO significant differences on any shift

  20. Results: Comparison of activities between shadow and self-report groups.

  21. Results: Comparing Weekdays to Weeknights • More time in educational activities during the day (p<0.005) • More personal time (usually sleep) at night • No difference in percent of time in non-educational activities

  22. Results: Comparing Weekdays to Weekends • More time in educational activities on Weekend days • No differences in time spent in non-educational activities • More time in personal activities on weeknights and weekend nights than on weekend days (p<0.005)

  23. Discussion: Validating Self-Report • Students’ and shadows’ records varied by less than 10% • In a study of smaller magnitude, Cook et al (1992) that found a 0.86 correlation between observer and student records • On average, records of students who were shadowed showed no difference from non-observed students This supports future use of self-report as an accurate method to collect student activity data

  24. Discussion: Student Activities • Weekdays • Nearly 80% of time engaged in educational activities • This despite not counting Wednesdays, our scheduled didactic day (Wednesdays) • Weekend days • Over 60% of students’ time spent in educational activities • Weeknights, weekend nights • Is the 45% of educational time worth the sleep deprivation? • Should overnight call perhaps be assigned just during 4th year electives rather than 3rd year clerkships?

  25. Discussion: Limitations • Our study averages data from students in two hospitals • University of Utah Hospital (tertiary-care, state funded, teaching hospital) and Latter-day Saints Hospital (tertiary-care, private hospital) • Each hospital has unique teaching settings and in-house call schedules • Different patient populations and payor mixes might find differences from what we found • Student and trained shadow judgment was used to categorize activities; attending surgeons may categorize the activities differently

  26. Conclusions • This data will be useful in planning future activities for medical students while on the surgery clerkship • Time in the hospital on weekdays and weekend days tends to be largely educational • The trade-off of sleep deprivation for little educational gain should be considered when requiring 3rd year surgery clerks to take overnight call

More Related