330 likes | 457 Views
This chapter delves into dynamic programming, covering fundamental concepts including the Fibonacci sequence, shortest path problems, and resource allocation. It explains how to optimize recursive computations through iterative approaches, highlighting the application of the principle of optimality. The chapter outlines methods such as forward and backward reasoning for problem-solving in multistage graphs. Additionally, it explores various algorithmic scenarios like the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) and the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS), providing insight into efficient solution strategies.
E N D
Chapter 8 Dynamic Programming
Fibonacci sequence • Fibonacci sequence: 0 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 13 , 21 , … Fi = i if i 1 Fi = Fi-1 + Fi-2 if i 2 • Solved by a recursive program: • Much replicated computation is done. • It should be solved by a simple loop.
Dynamic Programming • Dynamic Programming is an algorithm design method that can be used when the solution to a problem may be viewed as the result of a sequence of decisions
The shortest path • To find a shortest path in a multi-stage graph • Apply the greedy method : the shortest path from S to T : 1 + 2 + 5 = 8
The shortest path in multistage graphs • e.g. • The greedy method can not be applied to this case: (S, A, D, T) 1+4+18 = 23. • The real shortest path is: (S, C, F, T) 5+2+2 = 9.
Dynamic programming approach • Dynamic programming approach (forward approach): • d(S, T) = min{1+d(A, T), 2+d(B, T), 5+d(C, T)} • d(A,T) = min{4+d(D,T), 11+d(E,T)} = min{4+18, 11+13} = 22.
Dynamic programming • d(B, T) = min{9+d(D, T), 5+d(E, T), 16+d(F, T)} = min{9+18, 5+13, 16+2} = 18. • d(C, T) = min{ 2+d(F, T) } = 2+2 = 4 • d(S, T) = min{1+d(A, T), 2+d(B, T), 5+d(C, T)} = min{1+22, 2+18, 5+4} = 9. • The above way of reasoning is called backward reasoning.
Backward approach (forward reasoning) • d(S, A) = 1 d(S, B) = 2 d(S, C) = 5 • d(S,D)=min{d(S, A)+d(A, D),d(S, B)+d(B, D)} = min{ 1+4, 2+9 } = 5 d(S,E)=min{d(S, A)+d(A, E),d(S, B)+d(B, E)} = min{ 1+11, 2+5 } = 7 d(S,F)=min{d(S, A)+d(A, F),d(S, B)+d(B, F)} = min{ 2+16, 5+2 } = 7
d(S,T) = min{d(S, D)+d(D, T),d(S,E)+ d(E,T), d(S, F)+d(F, T)} = min{ 5+18, 7+13, 7+2 } = 9
Principle of optimality • Principle of optimality: Suppose that in solving a problem, we have to make a sequence of decisions D1, D2, …, Dn. If this sequence is optimal, then the last k decisions, 1 k n must be optimal. • e.g. the shortest path problem If i, i1, i2, …, j is a shortest path from i to j, then i1, i2, …, j must be a shortest path from i1 to j • In summary, if a problem can be described by a multistage graph, then it can be solved by dynamic programming.
Dynamic programming • Forward approach and backward approach: • Note that if the recurrence relations are formulated using the forward approach then the relations are solved backwards . i.e., beginning with the last decision • On the other hand if the relations are formulated using the backward approach, they are solved forwards. • To solve a problem by using dynamic programming: • Find out the recurrence relations. • Represent the problem by a multistage graph.
The resource allocation problem • m resources, n projects profit p(i, j) : j resources are allocated to project i. maximize the total profit.
The multistage graph solution • The resource allocation problem can be described as a multistage graph. • (i, j) : i resources allocated to projects 1, 2, …, j e.g. node H=(3, 2) : 3 resources allocated to projects 1, 2.
Find the longest path from S to T : (S, C, H, L, T), 8+5+0+0=13 2 resources allocated to project 1. 1 resource allocated to project 2. 0 resource allocated to projects 3, 4.
The traveling salesperson (TSP) problem • e.g. a directed graph : • Cost matrix:
The multistage graph solution • A multistage graph can describe all possible tours of a directed graph. • Find the shortest path: (1, 4, 3, 2, 1) 5+7+3+2=17
The representation of a node • Suppose that we have 6 vertices in the graph. • We can combine {1, 2, 3, 4} and {1, 3, 2, 4} into one node. • (3),(4,5,6) means that the last vertex visited is 3 and the remaining vertices to be visited are (4, 5, 6).
The dynamic programming approach • Let g(i, S) be the length of a shortest path starting at vertex i, going through all vertices in S and terminating at vertex 1. • The length of an optimal tour : • The general form: • Time complexity: ( ),( ) (n-k) (n-1)
The longest common subsequence (LCS) problem • A string : A = b a c a d • A subsequence of A: deleting 0 or more symbols from A (not necessarily consecutive). e.g. ad, ac, bac, acad, bacad, bcd. • Common subsequences of A = b a c a d and B = a c c b a d c b : ad, ac, bac, acad. • The longest common subsequence (LCS) of A and B: a c a d.
The LCS algorithm • Let A = a1 a2 am and B = b1 b2 bn • Let Li,j denote the length of the longest common subsequence of a1 a2 ai and b1 b2 bj. • Li,j = Li-1,j-1 + 1 if ai=bj max{ Li-1,j, Li,j-1 } if aibj L0,0 = L0,j = Li,0 = 0 for 1im, 1jn.
The dynamic programming approach for solving the LCS problem: • Time complexity: O(mn)
Tracing back in the LCS algorithm • e.g. A = b a c a d, B = a c c b a d c b • After all Li,j’s have been found, we can trace back to find the longest common subsequence of A and B.
0/1 knapsack problem • n objects , weight W1, W2, ,Wn profit P1, P2, ,Pn capacity M maximize subject to M xi = 0 or 1, 1in • e. g.
The multistage graph solution • The 0/1 knapsack problem can be described by a multistage graph.
The dynamic programming approach • The longest path represents the optimal solution: x1=0, x2=1, x3=1 = 20+30 = 50 • Let fi(Q) be the value of an optimal solution to objects 1,2,3,…,i with capacity Q. • fi(Q) = max{ fi-1(Q), fi-1(Q-Wi)+Pi } • The optimal solution is fn(M).
Optimal binary search trees • e.g. binary search trees for 3, 7, 9, 12;
Optimal binary search trees • n identifiers : a1 <a2 <a3 <…< an Pi, 1in : the probability that ai is searched. Qi, 0in : the probability that x is searched where ai < x < ai+1 (a0=-, an+1=).
Identifiers : 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14 • Internal node : successful search, Pi • External node : unsuccessful search, Qi • The expected cost of a binary tree: • The level of the root : 1
The dynamic programming approach • Let C(i, j) denote the cost of an optimal binary search tree containing ai,…,aj . • The cost of the optimal binary search tree with ak as its root :
Computation relationships of subtrees • e.g. n=4 • Time complexity : O(n3) when j-i=m, there are (n-m) C(i, j)’s to compute. Each C(i, j) with j-i=m can be computed in O(m) time.
Matrix-chain multiplication • n matrices A1, A2, …, An with size p0 p1, p1 p2, p2 p3, …, pn-1 pn To determine the multiplication order such that # of scalar multiplications is minimized. • To compute Ai Ai+1, we need pi-1pipi+1 scalar multiplications. e.g. n=4, A1: 3 5, A2: 5 4, A3: 4 2, A4: 2 5 ((A1 A2) A3) A4, # of scalar multiplications: 3 * 5 * 4 + 3 * 4 * 2 + 3 * 2 * 5 = 114 (A1 (A2 A3)) A4, # of scalar multiplications: 3 * 5 * 2 + 5 * 4 * 2 + 3 * 2 * 5 = 100 (A1 A2) (A3 A4), # of scalar multiplications: 3 * 5 * 4 + 3 * 4 * 5 + 4 * 2 * 5 = 160
Let m(i, j) denote the minimum cost for computing Ai Ai+1 … Aj • Computation sequence : • Time complexity : O(n3)