1 / 42

unhabitat

International Symposium on Sustainable Cities: Empowering Local Governments through Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing 26-28 September 2013, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Meeting Urban Sanitation Targets : Political Commitments and Infrastructure Investments.

shira
Download Presentation

unhabitat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Symposium on Sustainable Cities:Empowering Local Governments through Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing 26-28 September 2013, Incheon, Republic of Korea Meeting Urban Sanitation Targets : Political Commitments and Infrastructure Investments Dr. Kulwant SinghRegional AdvisorUrban Basic Services Branch, UN-Habitat www.unhabitat.org

  2. Sources of Funds for water • Water Users: Households, Farmers & BusinessesHouseholders invest their cash, labour and materials in wells, pipes, basic sanitation and other facilities. Farmers invest large sums in tubewells, pumps and surface irrigation systems, either on their own or as members of associations and user groups. Industrial and commercial firms often develop their own water supplies and effluent treatment facilities. Some large firms even supply the general population. Users also cross-subsidise each other through paying different tariffs. • Informal suppliers. In cities where growth has outstripped the public network, local entrepreneurs, often acting outside the law, fill the vacuum by selling water in bulk from tankers—or in containers and bottles.

  3. Sources of Funds for Water • Public water authorities and utilities fund recurrent spending and some new investment from revenues provided by user charges (gross operating cash flow), loans and sometimes public subsidies. • Private companies, either local or foreign, providing funds from sources similar to public utilities, plus equity injection. • Non-governmental organisations and local communities, raising funds from voluntary private contributions or grants from international agencies. • Local banks and other financial institutions offer short-term or medium-term loans at market rates. • International banks and export credit agencies, providing larger volumes of finance than local sources, against corporate guarantees or project cash flow

  4. Sources of Funds for water • International aid from multilateral and bilateral sources, available as loans on concessional terms or grants • Multilateral financial institutions: Loans on near-market terms • Environmental and Water and Sanitation Trust Funds • National Central and Local governments, providing subsidies, guarantees of loans, and proceeds of bond issues

  5. The sanitation “value chain” Value chain Types of services Main actors Demand creation Promote sanitation , create demand, community organisation MDG focus • Local governments • CBOs, NGOs • Households (investors) • Masons • Utilities Collection On-site w/o reuse Sewer connections On-site with reuse • Pit-latrine emptiers (manual emptying, trucks, etc) • Utilities (sewers) Partial on-site treatment Environmental focus Transport • Local governments • Utilities • SSIPs Treatment Decentralised treatment facilities Treatment Plants Environment • Local governments • Local farmers, etc.. Re-use (energy, agriculture) Disposal / Re-use

  6. Financing Sanitation - Main challenges • Unrealistic plans and inadequate finance; “political considerations” given higher priority; No monitoring of Plans or implementation • Fragmented financing channels • Difficult to charge for an “immaterial” service, with low or unexpressed demand • Lack of clarity on what funds should be used for • Evidence of “wasted” hardware subsidies • Mis-allocation of funds across the value chain: “too much” for wastewater treatment rather than basic sanitation • On-site sanitation: • Households are supposed to be main investors in sanitation but get limited support • Insufficient focus on environmental impacts of poor sanitation and associated economic losses

  7. Need for Leveraging local resources • For countries to achieve economically feasible levels: Sector Expenditure to be around 2 to 3 percent of GDP. • To enable different levels of service – Public funds should focus on basic access • To enable rehabilitation/ augmentation in existing projects • To contribute for the development of the financial sector through new business lines in water projects for micro-finance and domestic finance institutions

  8. Mobilizing Domestic and Private Resources

  9. Directing domestic resources and donor support to areas of greatest need and greatest impact Revenue transfers from central government to local authorities Direct access to capital markets by local authorities Financing Sanitation Services

  10. Mobilization of financial support to bankable project and programme proposals Cost recovery policy Micro credit schemes Financing Sanitation Services

  11. The sanitation financing “equation” Maintenance and operating costs Maintenance and operating costs Household recurrent payments Household Recurrent payments FUNDING GAP REPAYABLE FINANCING Capital costs FUNDING GAP Capital costs Household capital investment Household capital investment COSTS COSTS SOURCE OF FUNDS SOURCE OF FUNDS Sources of funding: Government own resources Development Bank concessionary funding Commercial financing, microfinance e.g.: Financing on-site sanitation LOWER COST TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC SUBSIDIES

  12. Cost of on-site sanitation: alternative standards

  13. Different public financing effectiveness

  14. Mobilising repayable financing

  15. Need for Adequate Sustainable Access • Shelter and human settlements are central to the pursuit of the water and sanitation targets of the MDGs • Strategies for service delivery need to be differentiated to match the different types of human settlements • Future design of human settlements should aim at mixed income settlements rather than differentiated income settlement types • Most of the world’s people without adequate access to sustainable water and sanitation services are the poor or people who live in rural areas and small urban settlements • Poor women and children in all types of human settlements face specific challenges in accessing clean water and adequate sanitation, and these challenges need to be better understood and appropriate remedies designed for them

  16. Need for Bridging the Financial Gaps • External finance/ ODA should be grant-based, especially for delivery of service in urban centers in low-income countries. • Operating costs in all low-income countries need to be covered through grants or other instruments like output-based aid. • Small urban centers below the poverty line located in middle income countries may need a variety of instruments, including: • lifeline tariffs (such as those used in South Africa), • output-based loans buttressed by appropriate forms of external guarantees. • Domestic resource mobilization should be maximized ensuring that capital and operating costs are adequately funded. • Ensure that considerations of affordability are reconciled with the need to generate revenues from those that can afford to pay for service. • Wherever feasible, make trunk infrastructure publicly financed

  17. Closing the Gap: Two Cardinal Sets of Principles • While ensuring the delivery of water and sanitation services is squarely the responsibility of each national government. But to be successful they will need, above all, determined leadership and the political will that is absolutely necessary to maintain the commitment that will be needed. • Given the record of delayed projects or initiatives that have been reversed, short duration projects, using fast track mechanisms, which begin to deliver safe and affordable water and sanitation, within the span of a political cycle can protect the interests of poor communities from the effects of political changes, which can result from a competitive political environment.

  18. Need for Monitoring • Monitor trends and progress within the water supply and sanitation sector • Build national capacity for monitoring, and • Inform policy makers and civil society of the status of the sector.

  19. What do we need to know… Understanding sanitation costs • Software costs: including all the costs, evaluating the comparative effectiveness of software support • Estimating lifecycle costs to guide appropriate investment (incorporating opex and maintenance costs) • Improve and redesign M&E frameworks so as to keep track of critical financing information Sources of financing • Assess drivers and constraints for investment at household level • Explore the potential for using “innovative” financing mechanisms, such as micro-finance • Identify how public finance can be better targeted • Leverage other financing sources (“social investors”) • Evaluate potential for “payments for environmental services”

  20. What do we need to know… Understanding the potential for microfinance • Micro-finance schemes have potential to leverage substantial private (hh) investments BUT limited and mixed experiences in sanitation; • Need to understand why and how they can work to mobilize financing for MDGs with limited public funds: for households and for small-scale entrepreneurs; Allocating financing at the right “level” based on benefits • Where coverage is low, channeling financing to the utility may miss a large component of the “sanitation market”: financing households and small-scale entrepreneurs also to be considered • Where coverage is high, need to better understand the potential benefits from increasing treatment levels (at the extreme, evidence of some declining returns to further tightening standards)

  21. Revolving Fund - Background and Context • UN-HABITAT established Revolving funds, as an Instrument of the Poor, for the construction of individual household toilets and community-managed water supply scheme in Madhya Pradesh; • In Lao PDR, another revolving fund for water connection and latrine construction set up • Revolving funds enable poor to avail credit for accessing WATSAN services. • Revolving funds also create demand for services and strengthen CBOs to actively participate to avail services and make them affordable. Revolving Funds

  22. Operational Revolving Fund for Community Managed Water Supply Scheme (CMWSS) in India • Demonstrate ways that how a community can be empowered/ enabled to execute and manage adequate safe drinking water as per their needs and affordability. • Small network of Community Water and Sanitation Committees (CWASCs) ensure water supply to the poor immediately and operates the system for a certain time • Capital cost investment under CMWSS of Rs. 3.0 million (US$ 68000) • Providing water connection to 1200 to 1500 households • The rapid connection (3-6 months vs. 3-6 years) of people to piped water as a means of attaining the Millennium Development Goals • Pay back recovery of distribution/connection costs in 3-5 years

  23. Institutional Responsibilities of the Partners to Implement CMWSS Projects • UN-HABITAT • Conceptualisation of CMWSS Projects; Social mobilisation, capacity development, communication and project management • Coordination between Municipal Corporation (MC)/ District Urban Developmental Agency (DUDA) and CWASC • Monitoring and evaluation of physical and financial performance and management of the water supply projects • Municipal Corporations/ DUDA • Project feasibility study and survey of community mobilization activities and formulation of CMWSS Projects • Entering into cooperation agreement with UN-HABITAT for creating revolving fund • Guiding the CWASC in designing and supervising the physical implementation and Scale up CMWSS in other slums of the city • UN-HABITAT • Execute safe drinking water scheme for the area; Carry out billing and collection systems • Manage operation and maintenance of water supply system • Paying loan amount to MC/ DUDA in installments

  24. CMWSS FLOW CHART Cooperation Agreement Bulk water charges Repayment of RF in installments Households O & M Charges Service Provider / Supplier Pay Connection and Monthly user charges

  25. CMWSS, Jabalpur

  26. CMWSS, Gwalior

  27. CMWSS, Indore

  28. Operational Revolving Fund for Slums Environmental Sanitation Initiative (SESI) in India • Integrated approach to environmental sanitation • Focus on community-led and people centred initiatives. • Piloting Community-based projects on Urban Environmental Sanitation in 63 slums covering 20,000 households (100,000 Population) in Bhopal, Gwalior, Indore and Jabalpur • Partnership with Water Aid India and four Municipal Corporations at a total cost of US$ 1.1 million • Revolving Sanitation Fund for the Construction of Individual Household Toilet in Urban Slums established • Capital Cost investment under SESI Revolving Fund is Rs. 2.0 million (US$ 45000) • Revolving funds for Individual Sanitary Toilets @ Rs. 2000 (US$ 45) for 1000 units

  29. Table 1: Sanitation Facilities developed and the beneficiaries in 4 cities of Madhya Pradesh Table 2: Common facilities provided in community toilets and the beneficiaries

  30. UN-HABITAT signed an cooperation agreement with National Housing Bank of India for developing Revolving Fund to Microfinance Water and Sanitation Services to the Poorer Sections of Society in India Initiative commenced to leverage funds - UN-HABITAT’s contribution of US$ 375,000 will leverage US$2.5 million of NHB’s financial assistance towards micro-financing water and sanitation. UN-HABITAT Partnership with NHB India on Micro-financing • Focus on the provision of water and sanitation facilities in the housing and habitat projects undertaken by NHB for low income households.

  31. UN-Habitat and NHB Project objectives • Develop a Revolving Fund to microfinance water and sanitation services to the poor in India. • Demonstrate the approach of revolving fund for micro-financing the water and sanitation services through pilot demonstration projects for the poor in India. • Undertake research studies on various habitat related issues including in microfinance and its role in addressing the issues relating to habitat development for the unserved and the underserved building sustainable financing systems, etc. • Organize workshops/seminars and other capacity building activities at city/ state/ national levels in India for promoting revolving fund for water and sanitation.

  32. Financing Mechanism – Revolving Fund for WATSAN Services • Ensure end use of these revolving funds for water and sanitation purposes for poor households • Utilization of funds to provide concessional loans for NHB's housing projects at national level • Repayments received from projects will be credited back to the Revolving Fund except for 10% of the amount for Technical Assistance by NHB • About 9500 households are expected to be benefitted under this project • The approximate Water Supply and Sanitation Cost per Household would be:

  33. Governance Structure • Projects to be implemented through MFIs/NGOs. • A Steering Committee with officials from UN-Habitat and NHB for project implementation and monitoring. • NHB to receive project proposals from MFIs/NGOs. • Project appraisal by NHB as per it's existing appraisal standards under the guidance of the Steering Committee. • NHB to disburse funds as per it's existing disbursement procedures. • A Revolving Fund at NHB to credit the repayments received from various borrowers and on-lend the proceeds for fresh projects

  34. Way Forward...... • Few projects already under identification for 3000 toilets. • 500,000 households expected to be covered for water and sanitation in the first 5 years. • Programme to provide water access to 2.5 million poor people during the first five years. • Emphasis on sustainable water and sanitation programme for the poor. • Programme to strengthen the UN-HABITAT - NHB partnership by information through community based organisations

  35. Guidelines Revolving Sanitation Fund for the Construction of Individual Household Toilet in Urban Slums • Prepared jointly by UWSEI Project and the UN-Habitat. • Aim at facilitating provision of individual toilet facilities for creating open defecation free cities; • The Government of Madhya Pradesh has issued directives to all the ULBs of Madhya Pradesh to set up Revolving Sanitation Funds.

  36. Revolving Funds for CMWSS & SESI in Madhya Pradesh • Capital cost investment under CMWSS of Rs. 3.0 million (US$ 68000) • Providing water connection to 1200 to 1500 households • Total Payback period is 32 months • Capital Cost investment under SESI of Rs. 2.0 million (US$ 45000) • Revolving funds for Individual Sanitary Toilets @ Rs. 2000 (US$ 45) for 1000 units

  37. Issuance of Corporate Bonds in Nanjing, PR China • UN-Habitat conducted diagnostic study in the city of Nanjing • In support of WAC Programme, ADB provided technical assistance to Nanjing Water Utility • Long Term Capital Finance in Commercial Markets for the issue of Corporation Bonds of RMB 2 billion (US$ 25.9 million) for water and environmental projects of Nanjing

  38. Ratio of treated to untreated wastewater discharged into water bodies (March 2010) Source: UNEP/GRID-Arendal (http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/ratio-of-wastewater-treatment1, a map by H. Ahlenius, adapted from a map by H. Ahlenius [http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/ratio -of-wastewater-treatment, sources UNEP-GPA, 2004]).

  39. Managing Wastewater in Asia Around 80% of wastewater is discharged without treatment; For region’s health and environmental sustainability goals, following four drivers are needed: Bottom line is to market wastewater management and reuse as an economically and financially viable business to substantially accelerate both public and private investments

  40. Wastewater as a Business • Wastewater must be seen as a resource with potential financial returns and opportunities for green employment; • It is critical to move away from the high energy solutions—or no treatment at all—toward something affordable and doable; • Turn towards decentralized wastewater treatment systems, especially in peri-urban and coastal communities and public markets; • Organic fertilizer from ecosan toilets has turned farmers into entrepreneurs; whereas Biogas digesters connected to sanitation facilities produced cheap energy source in the region; • Innovative financing mechanisms provide incentives for households to invest in on-site sanitation systems and cities to invest in wastewater management systems; • Involve public-private partnership (PPP) for enabling environment and economic regulatory framework to reduce risks to the investment.

  41. Partnerships for Managing Wastewater • Household toilets only one component of the whole gamut of Sanitation ; • Sanitation also includes wastewater conveyance, treatment, and disposal or reuse, as well as maintenance of the assets and quality of service delivery; • Managing wastewater does need provision of technical or engineering solutions besides understanding social, political and environmental complexities attached to it; • Business of sanitation requires a collaborative approach among the government, private sector, civil society and communities, and within the different levels of government from central to local administrations; • Partnerships essential for pooling the efforts and resources of the different partners to implement solution options; • Forging effective and lasting partnerships for achieving Goals of Wastewater Management.

  42. Thanks for your Attention. . . . www.unhabitat.org

More Related