ethical relations l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Ethical Relations PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Ethical Relations

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 27

Ethical Relations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on

Ethical Relations. Jenny Graham, Ini Grewal, Jane Lewis Presentation to the ESRC Research Methods Festival July 2006. Coverage of talk. introduction to the study conceptions of ethics the decision-making process and information needs the centrality of the interview interaction

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Ethical Relations' - shing


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
ethical relations

Ethical Relations

Jenny Graham, Ini Grewal, Jane Lewis

Presentation to the

ESRC Research Methods Festival

July 2006

coverage of talk
Coverage of talk
  • introduction to the study
  • conceptions of ethics
  • the decision-making process and information needs
  • the centrality of the interview interaction
  • managing information disclosure
  • the footprint of the interview
  • discussion points
ethical relations4
Ethical Relations

Aim

  • to explore research participants’ ethical requirements

Design

  • literature review
  • following up 10 participants in each of 5 NatCen studies
  • in-depth interviews, purposive sampling, analysed using Framework
conceptualising ethics
Conceptualising ethics
  • choice between framing through- researcher conceptions- participant conceptions
  • middle position taken- explore participant conception of ethics - explore experience of participating in research esp aspects key to researcher conception of ethics- explore fit with participant concept of ethics
operationalising our approach the interview structure
Operationalising our approach: the interview structure
  • meaning of ethics
  • application to research context
  • reconstruction of interview- significant, positive and negative features
  • walk through research process- experiences, reactions, requirements- important aspects to get right, advice would give
  • summarising most important aspects
  • (where possible) relating back to initial concept of ethics
initial conceptions of ethics
Initial conceptions of ethics
  • varying degrees of familiarity and clarity
  • key components:- respect- morality, integrity, probity- beyond self-interest- processual
experiential concepts of ethics
knowing what to expect

clarity about purpose

legitimacy and safety

independence

voluntariness

confidentiality

rapport and behaviour

scope to withhold, control, end

self-expression

respect for privacy

management of distress

use made

accuracy and lack of bias

feedback

Experiential concepts of ethics
slide11

Decision-making

and information needs

process of decision making
Process of decision-making
  • typically swift decision at first contact
  • little evidence of weighing up pros and cons, benefit and harm
  • 4 decision-making pathways- motivation- absence of disinclination- reassurance or persuasion- sense of compulsion
a relationship of trust
A relationship of trust
  • worthwhile purpose
  • will be heard and acted on
  • genuine and confidential
  • can withhold
  • boundaries respected
  • assumptions readily formed
  • little understanding of nature of interview interaction
  • more information needs in retrospect
slide14

Centrality of the

interview interaction

centrality of the interview
Centrality of the interview
  • centrality of the interviewer-participant interaction
  • central to being ‘comfortable’
  • implications for the data given
central features of the interview
Central features of the interview
  • interviewer behaviour and characteristics in relation to the participant
    • gender matching and information exchange not emphasised
  • views and feelings about the questions asked
    • relevance
    • clarity
    • whether represent views/areas viewed as important
  • interaction between these elements
preparation for the interview and limiting disclosure
Preparation for the interview and limiting disclosure
  • concerns re privacy
  • emphasis in participant recall on the voluntary nature of answering questions
  • and yet..
  • rare to prepare what areas not going to discuss
  • if thought given prior to interview is about ‘performance’
limiting disclosure during the interview
Limiting disclosure during the interview
  • rare in practice
  • type of information withheld during interview:
    • financial, relationships, health & wellbeing
  • reasons for withholding
    • relevance
    • sensitivity/intrusiveness
    • lack of trust in confidentiality
strategies employed to withhold information
Strategies employed to withhold information
  • Qualitative
  • giving outline, no detail
  • ‘rigging’
  • talking ‘off the record’
  • Survey
  • choosing ‘none of the above’
  • explicit in ‘don’t want to answer’
facilitators to withholding
Facilitators to withholding
  • information in advance re question areas
  • assertion/reassurance that info giving voluntary
  • quality of interaction with the interviewer
  • not being asked to explain lack of disclosure
  • being in own home/territory
  • personal confidence
pressures against withholding
Pressures against withholding
  • value of study (ends justifying means)
  • commitment/obligation/manners
  • previously disclosed
  • demonstrating openness
  • passive construction of role
  • voluntary nature of disclosure - symbolic versus literal
  • ‘beguiling’?
slide23

Interview aftermath:

the ‘footprint’ of

participation

the footprints
The ‘footprints’
  • Positive
  • value of contribution
  • validation of experience
  • increased awareness and understanding
  • enhanced view of self
  • Negative
  • reliving past difficult experiences
  • mental ‘cost’ of participation
  • view of self or responses
  • concern over purpose, usefulness or confidentiality
weighing up positive and negative footprints
Weighing up positive and negative footprints

Positive

Negative

absence of

footprint

footprint

footprint

Perceived value of research. Based on:

understanding

expectations

perceived

and

reflections

and

on ‘change capability’ of

research - from the relevance of questions and

topic coverage

key emergent issues
Key emergent issues
  • is this ethics?
  • supporting decision-making and preparation
  • facilitating management of information disclosure
  • comparisons with framework of ethics from researcher perspective and ethics procedures
  • the passive construction of the process
  • requirements on funders
  • balancing ethics with the need for robust and rigorous information