agricultural biotechnology and gmo s national and international structures n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures” PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 30

“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 222 Views
  • Uploaded on

“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”. Johan Brink, Institute of International Agriculture Michigan State University. National Extension Conference Michigan State University 24 -27 March 2003 . Agricultural Biotechnology.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
agricultural biotechnology and gmo s national and international structures

“Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”

Johan Brink,

Institute of International Agriculture

Michigan State University

National Extension Conference

Michigan State University

24 -27 March 2003

agricultural biotechnology
Agricultural Biotechnology

1st Generation Biotechnology

  • producing wine, beer, cheese, vaccines

2nd Generation Biotechnology

  • conventional breeding, tissue culture techniques

3rd Generation Biotechnology or “Modern Biotechnology

  • recombinant DNA technology, GMO’s, genomics
agricultural biotechnology1
Agricultural Biotechnology

Modern Biotechnology – GM products

  • is not a silver bullet or a quick fix to solve the world’s poverty and food security problems
  • when combined with conventional approaches, it can go a long way in the improvement of crop productivity
  • does require a new way of thinking, organization and communication
slide4

Comprehensive Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology

Agri Industry

Outreach

Economic Growth

Food Security

Improved Nutrition

Public Outreach

Market/Trade

R & D

Technology

Transfer

Extension &

Stewardship

IPR

Outreach & Communication

Farmers

Technology

Seed Indus.

Biotech Indus.

Regulatory

Framework

Varietal Release

Biosafety

PVP/IPR

Food &

Environmental Safety

Conventional Breeding

major policy issues in agricultural biotechnology
Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology

Biosafety

  • Food Safety
  • Environmental Safety
  • Regulatory Frameworks
  • Food Aid

Intellectual Property Rights/Plant Variety Protection

  • Patenting of technology, processes and products
major policy issues in agricultural biotechnology1
Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology

International Trade

  • Labeling
  • Export markets to Europe
  • Treaties : Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; Codex allimentarius; WTO rules
  • Globalization and control of the world’s food supply by multi-national companies
major policy issues in agricultural biotechnology2
Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology

Communication & Outreach

  • Public awareness & acceptance
  • Policy maker awareness
  • Agricultural Industry awareness
  • Consumer benefits
  • Trust in science and regulatory system
  • Newsworthiness of GM foods
major policy issues in agricultural biotechnology3
Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology

Public/Private Sector partnerships and Linkages

  • Private sector concentrate on major crops such as corn, soybean, cotton
  • Public sector concentrate on papaya, potato, cassava, sweetpotato, banana, etc.
  • Private sector has deep pockets to comply with regulatory requirements
biotechnology policy challenges and constraints in developing countries
Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Developing Countries
  • No strategies for Communication and Outreach – Policy maker awareness and Public awareness
  • Lack of Human Resources with expertise in Biotechnology related policies
  • Lack of Financial resources to develop and implement policies
  • Lack of political will to adopt biotechnology and address crop productivity
  • Limited number of countries developed and implemented national biotechnology strategies
  • Lack of viable seed industries
biotechnology policy challenges and constraints in africa
Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Africa
  • Lack of co-operation among Government Ministries regulating biotechnology derived products
  • Lack of Public-Private sector partnerships that are critical to both R&D and “commercialization”
  • International Trade barriers
  • Food Aid Issues
  • Compliance with/to International Protocols/Treaties
  • Lack of Infrastructure and Institutional Support Structure eg. Biocontainment facilities, PVP/Patent offices, Food safety labs
  • Lack of Risk Assessment Capacity and expertise
elements of a biosafety framework to regulate gm products
Elements of a Biosafety Framework to regulate GM products
  • Legislative component – GM act or law passed by Parliament
  • Specific GM regulations – linked to the GM act and to be implemented and administered by a Government Department
  • Biosafety Framework implemented to :

- Assess Scientific Risk of GM product

- Assess Socio-Economic impacts

- Ensure Public Communication,

b iosafety framework in south africa
Biosafety Framework in South Africa
  • GMO Executive Council
  • Representatives from Depts. Of Agriculture, Science & Technology, Environmental Affairs, Health, Labor, Trade & Industry, Water Affairs & Forestry
  • Duties:
  • To advise the Minister of Agriculture on all aspects concerning the development, production, use, application and release of GM Product
  • To assess the potential Socio-Economic impact of the GM Product
  • To communicate and interact with the public

Scientific Advisory Committee

Duties: - Risk Assessment and Management

- Appoint Scientific Review Panel

Communication with Public

GMO Registrar : Department of Agriculture

Duties: Biosafety Administration

Monitor all GMO facilities and activities

Routine inspections

Appeal Board

Application for GMO Permit for Field test

regulatory framework in the usa
Regulatory Framework in the USA

GM products are regulated by 3 different agencies

  • Department of Agriculture (USDA) – oversees safety for cultivation
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – oversees the safe use of pesticides, including pesticides produced in GM plants
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – ensures products are safe to eat and addresses food labeling issues
roadmap for commercialization of a gm product
Roadmap for Commercialization of a GM Product
  • R&D – Technology Development, Field Tests and establish Proof of Concept
  • Product Development – Multi-location field trials, cultivar development and bulking-up of material
  • Regulatory File Development – Perform Food safety analysis (allergenicity, toxicity and nutritional composition) and environmental studies (outcrossing potential, effects on non-target organisms, etc)
  • Obtain “Freedom to Operate” – “Who owns the Intellectual Property of all the components of the product (gene, promoter, variety etc.)?”
  • Dissemination strategy – “How will product reach the farmer?” ; “Will private sector seed companies be involved?”
  • Extension – “ How do farmers grow and cultivate the product?”
  • Stewardship and Liability – Management of the product by farmers, processors and exporters
  • Public Communication of benefits, impacts
slide18

Global adoption of GM Crops : 2002

Source : Clive James, ISAAA

slide19

GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002

Source : Clive James, ISAAA

dominant transgenic crops 2002
Dominant Transgenic Crops :2002

Source : Clive James, ISAAA

global adoption rates of gmo s
Global Adoption Rates of GMO’s

Source : Clive James, ISAAA

gm crops planted in the usa 2002
GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002
  • Planted 39 million ha (66% of total ha)
  • Soybean (HT), Corn (IR;HT), Canola (HT), Cotton (IR;HT), Stacked traits
  • Net gain of 3.3 million ha in 2002
  • 79% of national soybean area planted to herbicide tolerant RR soybean
  • Increase in planting of Bt Corn in 2002
  • 10% Decrease in planting of GM cotton

Source : Clive James, ISAAA

more information on gm crops
More information on GM Crops
  • International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA)

http://www.isaaa.org

  • Crop Biotech Net - ISAAA Global Knowledge Centers

http://www.isaaa.org/kc

  • Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) at Michigan State University http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp
what is absp
What is “ABSP”
  • The Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) is a USAID-funded project based in the Institute of International Agriculture at the Michigan State University
  • Since 1991 ABSP, in collaboration with other US universities and the private sector, has integrated research, product development and policy/regulatory development to assist developing countries in accessing and generating biotechnology and in establishing a regulatory framework for the adoption of biotech crops
what is absp1
What is “ABSP”
  • ABSP focused on GM applications in potatoes, cucurbits, corn and tomatoes
  • Capacity building in: R&D, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Technology Transfer and Biosafety
  • Partner Countries: Costa Rica, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa
  • Regional Partners: East and Central Africa,

Southern Africa

absp 1991 2003
ABSP : 1991 - 2003

networking

ABSP is a successful model for Agricultural Biotechnology development

policy

research

management

slide28

Fire Damage to ABSP Offices

January 1, 2000

  • Arson attack on ABSP offices in Agriculture Hall, MSU
  • Earth Liberation Front (ELF)
  • claim responsibility for fire damage
slide29

Thank you for your attention !

http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp

europe and gmo s
Europe and GMO’s
  • Cultural differences ; traditional agriculture system
  • Small continent and countries ; ecologically vulnerable
  • Science is criticized and scientists are not trusted
  • No pressure to improve crop productivity
  • Food scandals in Europe ; BSE etc.
  • The role of the media in communicating the biotech message ; “Bad news is not good news” ; GM foods less newsworthy in recent months
  • Public perception and acceptance