1 / 30

Deepwater Improved Oil Recovery Can Technology Overcome Economics?

Deepwater Improved Oil Recovery Can Technology Overcome Economics?. Gavin Longmuir – Knowledge Reservoir. Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Technical Symposium – 28 Aug 2009. RPSEA Project 1701 – DW GoM IOR. 2005 Energy Policy Act

Download Presentation

Deepwater Improved Oil Recovery Can Technology Overcome Economics?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Deepwater Improved Oil RecoveryCan Technology Overcome Economics? Gavin Longmuir – Knowledge Reservoir Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Technical Symposium – 28 Aug 2009

  2. RPSEA Project 1701 – DW GoM IOR • 2005 Energy Policy Act - Set up a public-benefit research program - $50 Million/year for 10 years - Funded from Federal lease bonuses & royalties paid by industry

  3. RPSEA Project 1701 – DW GoM IOR • 2005 Energy Policy Act - Set up a public-benefit research program - $50 Million/year for 10 years - Funded from Federal lease bonuses & royalties paid by industry • Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America - Non-Profit Consortium – universities, natl. labs, producers, consumers - Chosen by US Dept. of Energy to manage public-benefit research program

  4. RPSEA Project 1701 – DW GoM IOR • 2005 Energy Policy Act - Set up a public-benefit research program - $50 Million/year for 10 years - Funded from Federal lease bonuses & royalties paid by industry • Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America - Non-Profit Consortium – universities, natl. labs, producers, consumers - Chosen by US Dept. of Energy to manage public-benefit research program • DeepStar Industry Consortium - Funded by 9 major companies active in DW GoM - Chosen by RPSEA to administer Ultra-Deepwater Program - $17.5 Million/yr

  5. RPSEA Project 1701 – DW GoM IOR • 2005 Energy Policy Act - Set up a public-benefit research program - $50 Million/year for 10 years - Funded from Federal lease bonuses & royalties paid by industry • Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America - Non-Profit Consortium – universities, natl. labs, producers, consumers - Chosen by US Dept. of Energy to manage public-benefit research program • DeepStar Industry Consortium - Funded by 9 major companies active in DW GoM - Chosen by RPSEA to administer Ultra-Deepwater Program - $17.5 Million/yr • Knowledge Reservoir / Louisiana State Univ. / Anadarko - Successful bidders on RPSEA 1701 - IOR for DW GoM - $2 Million project – Completion 2 Aug 2010

  6. RPSEA 1701 – Project Objectives • Identify IOR Processes for Deepwater GoM • - potential to add substantial incremental reserves • - relatively close to economic feasibility • Understand the “technical gaps” • - why those IOR processes are not economic today • Recommend future R&D programs • - how to bridge those technical gaps • - identify potential partners for RPSEA R&D

  7. Broad Scope of IOR in Deepwater GoM EOR Artificial Lift / Infill Drilling Secondary Recovery Primary / Stimulation / Natural Water Drive Maximize URF 0% Ultimate Recovery Factor 100%

  8. Broad Scope of IOR in Deepwater GoM Discovered, Undeveloped Offshore IOR EOR Artificial Lift / Infill Drilling Secondary Recovery Primary / Stimulation / Natural Water Drive Maximize URF 0% Ultimate Recovery Factor 100%

  9. DW GoM – World-Scale Opportunity …

  10. … But Many Reservoirs are Small …

  11. … And Deep 0 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 MMS Data – Neogene Only 518 Oil Reservoirs 22.8 Billion Bbl OOIP 490 Smaller Reservoirs < 172 MMB OOIP 28 Larger Reservoirs > 172 MMB OOIP Future Paleogene

  12. IOR Target – 39 Billion Bbl ROIP Projected 39 Billion Bbl Discovered Remaining Oil In Place

  13. Limited Secondary Recovery to Date ~190 Discoveries in DW GoM (includes ~15 in Paleogene) 82 Developed Neogene Oil fields 22.8 Billion Bbl OOIP in 518 reservoirs 10 Oil Fields with Water Floods 3.4 Billion Bbl OOIP in 16 reservoirs 15% of Developed OOIP has been Water Flooded 0 Fields with Gas Injection

  14. Justifying Wells in High Cost DW GoM

  15. Why Oil gets Left Behind? From Literature Survey & Interviews: • Economics • Technical Challenges • Need for Local Favorable Factors • Perception of High Risk

  16. Local Favorable Factors • Miscible Gas Injection project: Intisar D Field, Libya LFF – Availability of stranded produced gas • Chemical Flood project: Daqing Field, China LFF – Gov’t support; chemical manufacture on site • CO2 Flood projects: West Texas LFF – Proximity to very large natural CO2 deposits What are LFFs for Deepwater GoM fields?

  17. Perception of Risk • Spotty industry track record on accurately predicting project costs & benefits • Consequent requirement for robust economics - Provide safety net for optimistic predictions • Resulting reluctance to invest in IOR

  18. Perception of Risk • Spotty industry track record on accurately predicting project costs & benefits • Consequent requirement for robust economics - Provide safety net for optimistic predictions • Resulting reluctance to invest in IOR 1.Successful Demonstrations 2. Reduced Development Exposure

  19. Getting “Trapped Oil” Out Capillary-Bound Residual Oil Poor Sweep - Compartments - Stacked Sands - Well Placement Limited/Absent Drive Mechanism High Abandon Press

  20. Getting “Trapped Oil” Out Capillary-Bound Residual Oil Poor Sweep - Compartments - Stacked Sands - Well Placement Limited/Absent Drive Mechanism High Abandon Press Artificial Lift

  21. Getting “Trapped Oil” Out Capillary-Bound Residual Oil Poor Sweep - Compartments - Stacked Sands - Well Placement Infill Drilling Limited/Absent Drive Mechanism Fluid Injection High Abandon Press Artificial Lift

  22. Getting “Trapped Oil” Out Capillary-Bound Residual Oil Selective Completions Infill Drilling Poor Sweep - Compartments - Stacked Sands - Well Placement Limited/Absent Drive Mechanism Fluid Injection High Abandon Press Artificial Lift

  23. Getting “Trapped Oil” Out Capillary-Bound Residual Oil Miscible Processes Selective Completions Infill Drilling Poor Sweep - Compartments - Stacked Sands - Well Placement Limited/Absent Drive Mechanism Fluid Injection High Abandon Press Artificial Lift

  24. Paleogene Challenge – Low URF

  25. Local Favorable Factor – Stacked Sands? Overlying Gas Sand Low Cost Artificial Lift by controlled commingling Technical Gap: Reliable Smart Well Technology

  26. Local Favorable Factor – Stacked Sands? Overlying Water Sand Low Cost Water Injection by powered dump flood Technical Gaps: Pump Life/Pump Replacement

  27. Building the Business Case for R&D ~ 70 Known IORProcesses + Innovative Approaches Preliminary Screening Prioritized ~ 15 Processes of Interest

  28. Prioritized Processes for DW GoM IOR • Artificial Lift • Reduced Cost Reservoir Penetrations • Reduced Cost Gas Injection Processes • Reduced Cost Water Injection Processes • Single Wellbore Injection/Production Processes • Cyclic Production of Sub-Economic Fields • Higher Credibility Performance Predictions

  29. Building the Business Case for R&D ~ 70 Known IORProcesses + Innovative Approaches Preliminary Screening Prioritized ~ 15 Processes of Interest Volume Upside (Analogs) Production Response Economic Analysis/Sensitivities Short List ~ 6 Processes with Potential

  30. Building the Business Case for R&D ~ 70 Known IORProcesses + Innovative Approaches Preliminary Screening Prioritized ~ 15 Processes of Interest Volume Upside (Analogs) Production Response Economic Analysis Economic Sensitivities Short List ~ 6 Processes with Potential Technical Gaps How to Bridge Gaps Final List of ~ 3 Processes Recommended for R&D

More Related