1 / 10

Quasi-Static Alfvén Wave Dynamics and Scale-Dependent Energy Deposition

Theory Program. Quasi-Static Alfvén Wave Dynamics and Scale-Dependent Energy Deposition in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling. W. Lotko, A. Streltsov Dartmouth College. R. Lysak University of Minnesota. What is a quasi-static Alfv én wave? Consequences for m-i coupling

shaw
Download Presentation

Quasi-Static Alfvén Wave Dynamics and Scale-Dependent Energy Deposition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theory Program Quasi-Static Alfvén Wave Dynamics and Scale-Dependent Energy Deposition in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling W. Lotko, A. Streltsov Dartmouth College R. Lysak University of Minnesota • What is a quasi-static Alfvén wave? • Consequences for m-i coupling • Low-altitude energy deposition • Observational features SM 71B-05

  2. Quasi-static Alfvén Wave: Conditions • 0PvA() >> 1 •  < 1 / 0P (low altitude) •  f < 14 mHz (Freja) • e.g., P = 5 S f < 6 mHz (FAST) • f < 1 mHz (Polar, Cluster) , f wave frequency  field-aligned distance above E region P Pedersen conductance vA() local Alfvén speed

  3. P = 10 S Rankin et al. ‘00 2 200 1.5 150 hB , nT– m B , nT 1 100 0.5 50 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 equator ionosphere /i Shear Alfvén Wavefunction

  4. E> J|| = K || d B0ê E< i J =PE  Quasi-static Alfvén Wave: Fields Vogt & Haerendel ‘98 Knudsen et al. ‘92 Transverse Length Scale for Chiu-Cornwall-Lyons ‘80 Weimer et al. ‘85

  5. ref inc J|| = K || 100 1 Insulator Reflection Coefficient Absorption, % 0 ~d Conductor -1 0 10 0.1 1 100 1000 J =PE  Wavelength, km Reflection and Absorption vAm 2 RE vAi Lysak and Carlson ‘81 Vogt and Haerendel‘98

  6. constant current P = 10 S constant voltage Dissipation Layer Energy Deposition: Length-Scale Dependence Streltsov and Lotko ‘02

  7. E> J|| = K || d E< Collisionless absorption Inferred Quantity i Poynting Fluxes J =PE 

  8. equator 125 s 220 s ENS ionosphere 235 s 141 s E LayerJ  J  Ne + – Ne2 + – P + – E –+ Stable?yesno 251 s 157 s 266 s 173 s 281 s 188 s 297 s 204 s L = 7.25 8.25 670 mV/m Feedback Instability Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator Streltsov and Lotko ‘02

  9. 0 equator BEW -50 ENS 600 nT mV/m -100 -150 670 mV/m 400 ENS ionosphere -200 200 distance, km 0 BEW PE 0 50 100 150 200 5 150 (mV/m)2 km (nT)2 km 270 nT 4 PB 100 3 2 j 50 k, km-1 1 0 0 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 80 A/m2 Time Step = 297 s “Satellite” Measurements Streltsov and Lotko ‘02

  10. Alfvén waves  quasi-static at low altitude ( < 10 mHz ) • MI Coupling • Lower magnetosphere: vA() >>  High “rigidity” • Jump in E at  (Haerendel - “fracture”) • Observational Features • Impedance: • S  electron energy flux • Feedback  low-altitude structure SUMMARY

More Related