1 / 23

spatial attention effects in V4 connor, preddie, gallant, van essen

spatial attention effects in V4 connor, preddie, gallant, van essen journal of neuroscience 17 (9), 1997. yan karklin. cns journal group. may 12 2004. attention affects perception enhanced perception when attending object centered or purely spatial?

sharib
Download Presentation

spatial attention effects in V4 connor, preddie, gallant, van essen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. spatial attention effects in V4 connor, preddie, gallant, van essen journal of neuroscience 17 (9), 1997 yan karklin. cns journal group. may 12 2004

  2. attention affects perception • enhanced perception when attending • object centered or purely spatial? • at which level is the saliency enhanced? • neural correlates? • behaviorally relevant stimuli evoke higher responses (V2, V4, IT) • would like to explore the precise spatial effect of attention • paradigm • map receptive field while drawing attention to other regions of visual field

  3. general paradigm • monkey required to attend to one of four circles (a, b, c, d) • receptive field probed with optimal bar (width, color, orientation)

  4. 4ring/5bar • monkey required to attend to one of four circles (a, b, c, d) • receptive field probed with optimal bar (width, color, orientation)

  5. 4ring/5bar • monkey required to attend to one of four circles (a, b, c, d) • receptive field probed with optimal bar (width, color, orientation)

  6. 4ring/5bar • monkey required to attend to one of four circles (a, b, c, d) • receptive field probed with optimal bar (width, color, orientation)

  7. 4ring/5bar • monkey required to attend to one of four circles (a, b, c, d) • receptive field probed with optimal bar (width, color, orientation)

  8. 2ring/7bar • just two circles (a, b, c, d) • but 7 bars - better resolution for observing shift in responses 0 6

  9. 12ring/bars • 12 circles (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l) • bars flash at once, several times

  10. 12ring/bars • just two circles (a, b, c, d) • but 7 bars - better resolution for observing shift in responses

  11. 12ring/bars • just two circles (a, b, c, d) • but 7 bars - better resolution for observing shift in responses

  12. sustained bar • same as 4ring/5bar - monkey attends to one circle (a, b, c, d) • draw attention with blink, check sustained response

  13. sustained bar • same as 4ring/5bar - monkey attends to one circle (a, b, c, d) • draw attention with blink, check sustained response

  14. analysis: response profile shift • how cell responds to bars in its RF as attention is drawn elsewhere

  15. analysis: response profile shift • same cell, different stimulus orientation A B

  16. analysis: response profile shift • peak position shift • fractional shift: how much the response shifts

  17. analysis: response profile shift • distribution of fractional shift/peak position shift 4ring/5bar 4ring/5bar 2ring/7bar 2ring/7bar

  18. analysis: response profile shift • average response profiles all 52 cells 39 cells w/sig frac shifts

  19. analysis: assymetry in response profile shift • response profiles are modulated in 2D patterns

  20. analysis: distributions of assymetries

  21. broadness of tuning • distance to peak • analysis: spatial distribution of response profile shift • 12ring test gives better spatial sampling

  22. analysis: an effect of extra-classical RF? summed bar response avg RF in ring strength of attentional effect correlation b/w RF values and 4ring/5bar responses position of fovea

  23. implications: • spatial code for position relative to center of attention?

More Related