1 / 13

Evaluation

Evaluation. Interim report Next step and perspectives Czesław Noworol Jagiello n ian University. Methodology. Internal evaluation IE by peer learning quality management PLQM

shania
Download Presentation

Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Interim report Next step and perspectives Czesław Noworol Jagiellonian University

  2. Methodology • Internal evaluation IE by peer learning quality managementPLQM • strategy foreseeing to help the coordinator and all the partners to keep quality in developingnational fora, which is aimed to increase efficacy and efficiency of lifelong guidance provision in EU according to the Lisbon resolution and other relevant regulations and declarations of the European Commission

  3. Methodology cont. • PLQM is focused on the all activities in the project sins very beginning • PLQM develops relevant tools, which will be applied in the evaluative procedures like questionnaire, evaluation sheets, quality assessment kit, etc. • PLQM will provide reliable information to the coordinator and all the partners after each evaluation step • PLQM will summarize the partial evaluations done by partners and relevant participants of the project

  4. Methodology cont. • After the Start up Meeting in Kraków the specially designed questionnaire was send to all the partners in order to gather their opinions • The questionnaire was focused onto two main issues: • 1. the project in formal and merit sense • 2. the project in the wider context of Education and Training 2010 work programme focusing contents, goals and outputs to be reach

  5. The questionnaire • Evaluation was made on two parallel scales: • of importance spread from 0: Not important till 6: Very important • of satisfaction spread from 0: Not satisfied till 6: Very satisfied, accordingly • Those two scales were used to prepare the evaluation matrix, which in the context of PLQM could be seen as decision-making matrix towards the excellence in project realization

  6. Not satisfied Acceptable Saisfied Very satisfied Very important Immediate action required VI_NS Important Try to improve, put it to the action plan VI_A Not important Very good, try to developtowards excellence VI_S Keep excellence in project realization and quality of products VI_VS Try to improve at you earliest convenience I_NS Put it into the strategic plan, I_A Keep standards& quality level I_S Think about quality, do not lay on laurels I_VS Improve were it is possible or dropit out of the project NI_NS May be, try to not worse the situation NI_A Try to reach standards if possible NI_S maybe develop an adding value to the project NI_VS The evaluation matrix

  7. Aspects of information Evaluation The main goal of the project VI_VS The idea of coming into being the European network of national fora for guidance VI_VS The idea of European Guidance Forum VI_VS The presentation of the Polish Forum VI_VS The contract with the Coordinator VI_S The working packages in general VI_VS My working package in particular VI_S

  8. Chosen aspects of Forum activities Evaluation Policies and programmes for lifelong guidance are formulated and implemented through ministries, users, social partners, service providers, employment services, education and training institutions, guidance practitioners, parents, and youth participation in a national forum for guidance VI_VS The relevant outputs of the Commission’s Expert Group are disseminated through relevant networks of policymakers such as European network of national guidance fora VI_A

  9. Initiatives undertaken at national level to promote cooperation and coordination among founders/ministries and other stakeholders within the context of the establishment of national forum for guidance VI_A Use of European network of national guidance fora for peer review and collaborative learning and improvement of national guidance provision in education, training and employment sectors VI_S

  10. The Roman Forum seen from the Tabularium • The Forum Romanum was the political and economical centre of Rome during the Republic. It emerged as such in the 7th century BCE and maintained this position well into the Imperial period, when it was reduced to a monumental area. • It was mostly abandoned at the end of the 4th century

  11. European Guidance Forum The Forum Romanum seen from the Palatine Hill

  12. Next steps in evaluation • Next questionnaire • Peer learning • Short descriptive reports of the partners • Policy development • Towards excellence of service • Towards common market and branding approach • Guidance practitioners competency standards • Client outcome frameworks • Issues of fora networking • The European Guidance Forum – new challenge or simply the next step in EU development?

More Related