1 / 27

Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock

Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock. Unit 2 Objectives: Understanding of methods used to determine nutrient composition of feeds Knowledge of sample collection methods Identify and communicate how feed samples are reported

Download Presentation

Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock

  2. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Unit 2 Objectives: • Understanding of methods used to determine nutrient composition of feeds • Knowledge of sample collection methods • Identify and communicate how feed samples are reported • Comprehension of how feedstuff digestibility is determined • Understand various energy measurements and how they are used • Physical and economical evaluation of feeds

  3. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Analytical Methods for Nutrient Composition • Three general types of methods can be used to determine effect of feedstuffs • Chemical procedures • Titration, colorimetry, etc. • Biological procedures • Feedstuff tested by a live animal (rat, chick) • More accurate • Much more tedious and expensive

  4. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Microbiological procedures • Tested w/ isolated bacteria • Obtaining Samples for Analysis • Key to reliable feed nutrient evaluation is a representative sample • Identification • Thoroughly identify the feed tested • What might we include in our identification? • Sampling • Grains/Mixed Feeds • Sacked feeds – 2 samples/sack, 5-7 sacks, handful each

  5. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Bulk Feeds – 12 to 15 samples, widely separate locations for sampling (while delivered or fed, if possible) • Mix samples in a clean pail, make sure feed doesn’t separate, send a 1 or 2lb. sample to the lab • Hay • Use a core sampler • Take a 12’ – 15” core sample that will include stem and leaves • 12 – 15 samples are needed to be accurate (1/bale) • Try to get to middle of the stack if possible • “Grab” Samples can be used, but accuracy is variable

  6. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Haylage or Silage • Upright silos – collect during feedout, several small samples, mix together for one composite • Pit/Bunker silos – 4-5 grab samples from a fresh face, do not collect spoiled material, do not collect within 12”-18” from edge • Freeze if you are collecting over multiple days • Refrigerate if you can’t mail immediately (what happens if you don’t do this?) • Harvest Sampling • Not recommended for any feed <30% DM • Same methods as discussed prior • 12-15 samples, mix for one composite • Mark different fields as feed is stored (plastic marker, oats, etc.)

  7. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • General • Not beneficial unless you are going to use in designing a feeding program • Three benefits to using sampling for proper balance of feedstuffs – 1) minimize protein supplementation and reduce cost, 2) can properly balance if a nutrient is being underfed, 3) can confirm that a factor other than feed is limiting production • Proximate Analysis • Most generally used chemical analysis to describe nutrient composition of feeds

  8. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Dry Matter (DM) • How do we determine DM content of a feedstuff? • Can we do this ourselves? • What is the benefit of knowing the DM content? • Ash (minerals) • Burned sample that removes all other nutrients • Only inorganic residue remains • May not be 100% accurate • Crude Protein (CP) • Digest to N through chemical process (Kjeldahl process) • How do we determine CP content from N concentration? • Does not distinguish between forms of N

  9. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Ether Extract (Fat) • Use ether to extract fat contents for 4 hrs • Loss of wt = fat content • Includes some “fats” that are of no use to animals, so may not be 100% accurate • CHO • Crude Fiber (CF) – remove water & fat; then through chemical rxn. to remove protein, sugar, and starch; leaves cellulose, lignin, and minerals; (how are the minerals removed?) • Nitrogen-Free Extract (NFE) – sugars and starches (maybe some hemicellulose & lignin); not determined by an analysis; 100% - water, ash, protein, fiber, fat

  10. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • The Van Soest Method • Focuses on forage fiber • Divides fiber into digestible and indigestible fractions • Extraction w/ detergents • Predicts intake – NDF – index of gut fill • Predicts digestibility – ADF – indicates forage digestibility • Heat damaged forages – can help determine the amount of protein unavailable in feedstuff. What level of unavailable begins to cause problems?

  11. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy • Ability to sample quickly w/ little preparation (grinding); only uses one sample • Can be completed in <3 min. • Analyze multiple components in one operation • Measurements done by absorption/reflection of light • Not accurate for minerals • Expensive equipment, must be calibrated correctly • Wet-chemistry analysis is more accurate • Inexpensive

  12. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Determination of Vitamins • No routine analysis available to determine vit content • Assays can be ordered to determine specific vitamins, if needed • Determination of Energy • Bomb Calorimeter • Sample is burned in an oxygen atmosphere • Liberated heat raises the temp of water surrounding the devise • This temp increase is the basis for determining the energy concentration • 1 cal heat required to raise 1g water 1º C

  13. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Nutrient Expression • DM basis • Most accurate/common way to express nutrient levels • Levels the playing field to compare feeds • As-Fed basis • Amount of nutrients contained in a feed as the animal would consume it • Air-Dry basis • Assumed to be ~90% DM

  14. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Let’s practice some conversions • Thumb rules • Nutrient concentration should increase when converting to DM basis • Wt. will decrease on DM basis • Feeding Trials • Can give information as to acceptance and performance of a feed • Doesn’t tell why a feed performed the way it did

  15. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Digestion or Metabolism Trial • Weakness of chemical analysis is that is doesn’t take into account digestibility very accurately • Steps of a digestion trial • Proximate feed analysis to know what you start w/ • Feed a measured amount of feed, or feed at constant rate • Collect fecal matter • Proximate analysis on feces • Difference is the apparent digestibility of the feed

  16. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Can use markers or indicators to identify feeds • Testing can be done in metabolism stalls where the animal is somewhat confined • Attached to collection instruments for feces and/or urine • Usually done in 2 phases • Preliminary phase • Frees digestive tract of any other types of feeds • Animal gets accustomed to the process and feed • 3-5d in pigs, 8-10d in ruminants

  17. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Collection phase • When feed and fecal collections are measured • What are some of the chances for error in this system? • Measures of Feedstuff Energy • Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) • General, calculated amount • Does not account for important losses of digestion • Can be expressed as lbs., %, or kg

  18. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Can be extremely variable/inaccurate (usually overestimate) • 1lb. TDN from 1.2 lbs. corn = 1.2 Mcal NE • 1lb. TDN from 2.1 lbs. hay = 1.0 Mcal NE • 1lb. TDN from 2.4 lbs. poor hay = .8 Mcal NE • Nutrient Partitioning in Digestion & Metabolism • Energy Units • Calorie = amount of heat needed to raise 1g water 1ºC • Kilocalorie = 1000 calories • Megacalorie = 1000 kcal, or 1,000,000 calories (a.k.a. therm)

  19. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Gross Energy (GE) • Total potential energy of a feedstuff consumed • Determined in a bomb calorimeter • Fecal Energy (FE) • Undigested residue that passes through the GI • Can be collected and tested same method as above • Digestible Energy (DE) • DE = GE – FE • Takes account of some losses during digestion • Gasseous Products of Digestion (GPD) • Combustible gasses that escape the body during digestion & absorption • Mostly methane; some H, CO, acetone, etc.

  20. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Most common in ruminants • Hard to measure accurately • Urinary Energy (UE) • Includes materials that result directly from the digestion/absorption/enzymatic processes • Many endogenous sources as well • Metabolizable Energy (ME) • ME = DE – UE – GPD • More accurate measure of nutritive value than DE and TDN • Easy to determine in nonruminants because of the lack of GPD

  21. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Heat Increment (HI) • Increase in heat production following feed consumption • Caused by the heats of fermentation, and heats of nutrient metabolism • Energy is wasted unless the environmental temperature is below the animal’s critical temperature zone • If it is used for temperature regulation, becomes part of NEm • Net Energy (NE) • NE = ME – HI • Amount of energy used for maintenance only, or for maintenance and production purposes • Function should be stated clearly when reporting/evaluating NE

  22. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • NEm (NE for Maintenance) • Part of total NE needed to keep animal in energy equilibrium • No gain/loss of energy in body tissue • Basal Metabolism – energy needed to maintain basic vital cellular activity • Energy of Voluntary Activity – energy needed for basic movement to obtain food, water, lying down, etc. • Heat to keep body warm – additional heat needed when environmental temp < animal’s critical temperature

  23. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Heat to keep body cool – extra energy expended when environmental temp > animal’s thermo neutral zone • NEp (NE Production) • Additional energy required above NEm • What would be considered production? • NEl, NEg • Energy in Beef Cattle • This system can be used to accurately predict energy needs for wt. gain under normal conditions • Make adjustments for abnormal conditions • See tables 2-3, 2-4, and 2-5 for reference • We will discuss further later in the semester

  24. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Energy in Dairy Cattle • NE values are much more accurate than any other system • Evaluate NEm, NEg, and NEl • NEl – includes energy requirements for pregnancy, reproduction, and milk production • NEl – most often used component in ration formulation and evaluation • Energy in Swine • Generally use ME or DE as their evaluating tools • Will eat to energy requirements if feed ad libitum • Will cover further later

  25. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Physical Evaluation of Feedstuffs • Eye Appraisal • Used mostly w/ forages • Type • Color • % of leaves • Weed contamination • Spoilage • Palatability

  26. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Factors Affecting Value • Soil fertility • Growing conditions • Harvesting • Stage of maturity • Losses • Processing & Storage • Evaluating Feeds Cost/Unit of Nutrient • Cost of feed/unit wt. divided by unit wt. * % nutrient concentration • Examples

  27. Unit 2: Evaluating Feedstuffs for Farm Livestock • Unit 2 Assignment: • Review Problem Solving Questions • 1-5 • Take your time!!!!

More Related