1 / 17

Use and Misuse of CT and MR Imaging in IBD

Use and Misuse of CT and MR Imaging in IBD. David H. Bruining, MD Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN bruining.david@mayo.edu. Disclosures. Consulting Bracco Avantis Research Support Janssen Biotech Given Genentech. Discussion Points. What is known/standard of care

sauda
Download Presentation

Use and Misuse of CT and MR Imaging in IBD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Use and Misuse of CT and MR Imaging in IBD David H. Bruining, MDMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN bruining.david@mayo.edu

  2. Disclosures Consulting • Bracco • Avantis Research Support • Janssen Biotech • Given • Genentech

  3. Discussion Points What is known/standard of care • Benefits of Imaging • CTE and MRE performance Appropriation / inappropriate applications • How are we doing? • New developments

  4. Symptoms Aren’t Enough Correlation coefficients (bolded) were significant; P<0.05; n=164 CDAI; Crohn’s disease activity index: SES-CD; simple endoscopic core for Crohn's disease Jones et al: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2008

  5. CT and MR EnterographySimilar Performance to CTE for Identifying Active Disease MRE CTE Siddiki et al: Am J Roentgenol, 2009

  6. CT and MR Enterography Advantages – CTE • Less interobserver variability • Higher image quality • Shorter image acquisition times • Cost • Access • Bone assessments Advantages – MRE • No radiation • Multiple phases • Detection of fibrosis • MRI superior for perianal disease • Pregnancy • Renal insufficiency

  7. Appropriate UseRight Test for the Right Patient

  8. Use of CT and MR Enterography in Crohn’s Disease Suspected Crohn’s disease • Establish disease • Determine optimal strategy for endoscopic confirmation (BAE) • Define extent and severity • Exclude alternate etiologies • Penetrating and stricturing complications • Extra-intestinal disease manifestation Established Crohn’s disease • Response to treatment • Surgical planning • Exclude alternate etiologies • Penetrating and stricturing complications • Extraintestinal disease manifestation • Bone health interrogations

  9. Lesion Remodeling on CTE 6/18/2007 9/26/2005 6/7/2004* *Infliximab initiated in 2004 after examination

  10. CTE Generated Finite Element ModelBone Strength Density distribution Regions of failure Weber et al: DDW, 2013

  11. When and How to Image Established disease • Disease activity • Disease extent • Disease severity • Evaluate for penetrating disease • Surgical planning • Assess response to therapy Suspected disease • Establish diagnosis • Exclude alternate or additional etiologies for patient symptoms • Postoperative • SBFT (complex) • Occult stricture • Enteroclysis • Other • VCE and ultrasound MRE • Age <35 years • Serial examinations • Renal disease • Pregnancy • Stricture • Perianal disease CTE

  12. Misuse of CT and MR Enterography Wrong test • Multiple CTEs in young patient (MRE) • MRE in elderly (CTE) • CTE or MRE for dysplasia (colonoscopy) • MRE for inpatient with sepsis/SIRS, tremor, obese, diabetics (CTE) • CTE in patient with renal insufficiency or pregnancy (MRE) Wrong patient • Chronic abdominal pain with multiple negative CT or MR examinations

  13. Emergency Medicine and IBD POA; perforation, obstruction, abscess: POANCD; POA + non-CD urgent Kerner et al: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatoll, 2012

  14. Can We Do Better? • Several models in development for ED triage • APON Risk Score • APON: Abscess, perforation, obstruction, new or worsening non-CD urgent findings • Final model variables: History of obstruction, history of intra-abdominal abscess, current hematochezia and WBC >12,000/µL • Score subtracts 1 for hematochezia and adds 1 point for others • APON risk score -1 is associated with low risk Kerner et al: Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2013

  15. Summary • Cross-sectional imaging • Objective measure of disease activity • Detects penetrating disease and extraintestinal manifestations • Alters management plans • Appropriate use • Applications continue to expand • Key is to match right patient with right exam

  16. Future Research • Fine-tuned predictive models – acute presentations • Widely available ED tool • Simple • Role of ultrasound • Standardized imaging algorithms, guidelines and reporting lexicon

More Related