1 / 19

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING AND META-ANALYSIS: A MARRIAGE MADE IN ...

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING AND META-ANALYSIS: A MARRIAGE MADE IN. Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology. 1+1=??. Peanut Butter & Chocolate Food & Wine Movies LeBron James & Dwayne Wade The Whole is More, Equal to, or Less than the Sum of Its Parts. Plan for Today.

sarai
Download Presentation

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING AND META-ANALYSIS: A MARRIAGE MADE IN ...

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING AND META-ANALYSIS:A MARRIAGE MADE IN ... Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology

  2. 1+1=?? • Peanut Butter & Chocolate • Food & Wine • Movies • LeBron James & Dwayne Wade • The Whole is More, Equal to, or Less than the Sum of Its Parts

  3. Plan for Today • Meta-Analysis (MA) FAQ • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) FAQ • MASEM • Research Questions & Focus • Steps/Decisions/Frustrations • Odds & Ends

  4. MA FAQ • Research Questions • Summarize available (published & unpublished) evidence • Estimate degree of relation between variables • Identify conditions in which effect differs

  5. MA FAQ • Foundational Issues & Pragmatic Concerns • Starting with a clear purpose • Why not just collect and code everything? • “HARK”ing • Nature of available evidence • Samples, research designs, measures • When is there enough information? • k’s and n’s • Adequate construct development • What am I looking for and how do I know if I have found it? • File Drawers • What if I’m missing something?

  6. SEM FAQ • Research Questions • To what degree are a set of indicators associated with a given set of latent variables (CFA)? • Are hypothesized causal relations between variables consistent with collected data (PA/Full SEM)? • Are there systematic patterns of change across time (LCM)? All require a priori specification of a particular model (or set of models)

  7. SEM FAQ • Foundational Issues & Pragmatic Concerns • Starting with a clear purpose • Why not just collect some data and start testing models? • “HARK”ing • Nature of available evidence • Samples, research designs, measures • When is there enough information? • n’s and identification • Adequate construct development • What am I looking for and how do I know if I have found it? • Everything relevant is included • What if I have omitted some important variables?

  8. MASEM • Possible Combinations • SEM used for MA (Cheung, 2008) • MA as input for SEM [TODAY] • Technical/Practical Focus • What are the underlying mathematical/statistical elements? • How do I undertake these analyses in my own work? [TODAY] • Primary Questions • Can I Integrate SEM and MA? • YES • How Do I Integrate SEM and MA? • HOPEFULLY A CLEARER UNDERSTANDING • Should I Integrate SEM and MA? • THE $64,000 QUESTION – IT DEPENDS

  9. General Steps Proposed by Viswesvaran & Ones (1995) • ID Core Constructs and Relations • ID Measures Used to Assess Each Construct • Obtain Relevant Studies • Conduct Meta-Analysis • Test Measurement Model • Estimate Construct Correlations • Apply SEM to Test Specified Relations

  10. Two-Stage Structural Equation Modeling (TSSEM)Proposed by Cheung & Chan (2005) STEP 1 • Test for Homogeneity of Correlations/Covariances • Using multiple groups CFA • Calculate Pooled Correlation/Covariance Matrix • Create Asymptotic Covariance Matrix STEP 2 • Apply SEM to Test Specified Relations BENEFIT • Accounts for second order sampling error, leading to more accurate chi-square and fit indices

  11. General Approach – Model Testing • Confirmatory Factor Analysis • Same measures/indicators across studies • Covariances • Path/Structural Models • Different measures/indicators across studies • Correlations

  12. Logic • First Step • Test of homogeneity • Build input matrix • Second Step • Model testing

  13. An Example –Earnest, Allen, & Landis (2011) • Student milestone project • Interest in Realistic Job Previews (RJPs) • How do we build on current MA’s? • Increased number of studies • Increased number of moderators • Conducted Meta-Analysis • Consideration of potential mediators via SEM

  14. An Example

  15. Example Matrix Construct the correlation matrix

  16. Issues in Constructing the Correlation Matrix • What about blank cells? • Listwise deletion? • Previous meta-analyses • Studies included in current meta-analysis • Meta-analytic values from ‘outside’ studies • Different sample sizes in cells • Which one do we use? • Illogical values/npd matrices • What if my matrix can’t occur? • Presence of moderators • What do I do if I have heterogeneity in the correlation matrices? • Correlations instead of covariances • Can I still run SEM?

  17. Odds & Ends • But… • Causality and MASEM make strange bedfellows • Yes, but this is not unique to MASEM • Lack of comfort with combining r’s from different studies into SEM analysis • Why? • What if latent variables differ across primary studies • Problem with MA, not MASEM

  18. A Few References • Burke, M.J. & Landis, R.S. (2003). Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. In K.R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity Generalization: A Critical Review (pp. 287-309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. • Cheung, M.W.L. (2009). TSSEM: A LISREL syntax generator for two-stage structural equation modeling (Version 1.11) [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from http://courses.nus.edu.sq/course/psycwlm/internet/tssem.zip. • Cheung, M.W.L. & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40-64. • Cheung, M.W.L. & Chan, W. (2009). A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 28-53. • Christian, M. S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., & Burke, M.J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103-1127.

  19. A Few References • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A., toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707. • Earnest, D.R., Allen, D.G., & Landis, R.S. (2011). A meta-analytic path analysis of the mechanisms linking realistic job previews and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 64, 865-897. • Klein, H.J., Wesson, M.J., Hollenbeck, J.R., Wright, P.M., & DeShon, R.P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 32-55. • Robbins, S. B., Oh, I., Le, H., Button, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163-1184. • Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D.S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865-885.

More Related