structural equation modeling l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Structural Equation Modeling PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Structural Equation Modeling

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Structural Equation Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 161 Views
  • Uploaded on

Structural Equation Modeling. Mgmt 291 Lecture 8 – Model Diagnostics And Model Validation Nov. 16, 2009. Computing Problem 1: “Not positive definite”. determinant of the matrix =< 0 makes Log Σ and Log S undefined computing work can not move forward.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Structural Equation Modeling' - damon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
structural equation modeling
Structural Equation Modeling

Mgmt 291

Lecture 8 – Model Diagnostics

And Model Validation

Nov. 16, 2009

computing problem 1 not positive definite
Computing Problem 1:“Not positive definite”
  • determinant of the matrix =< 0
  • makes LogΣ and LogS undefined
  • computing work can not move forward

Log|Σ(Θ)|+tr(S Σ-1(Θ)) – log|S| -(p+q)

common sources
Common Sources
  • 1) There are redundancies among the correlation matrices- in other words, some of the correlations may be a linear function of some of the other correlations.
  • You can fix this by removing the redundant variables or collecting more data.
  • 2) Your model may be estimating more parameters than you have degrees of freedom to use. You can check this by examining how many degrees of freedom you have and the number of parameters you are estimating.
  • 3) LISREL is not correctly reading the raw data, correlation matrix, or covariance.
other causes of not positive definite
Other causes of “not positive definite”
  • Starting Values
  • The model-implied matrix Sigma is computed from the model's parameter estimates. Especially before iterations begin, those estimates may be such that Sigma is not positive definite. So if the problem relates to Sigma, first make sure that the model has been specified correctly, with no syntax errors. If the proposed model is "unusual," then the starting value routines that are incorporated into most SEM programs may fail. Then it is up to the researcher to supply likely starting values.
  • Sampling Variation
  • When sample size is small, a sample covariance or correlation matrix may be not positive definite due to mere sampling fluctuation. It has been documented how parameter matrices (Theta-Delta, Theta-Epsilon, Psi and possibly Phi) may be not positive definite through mere sampling fluctuation. Most often, such cases involve "improper solutions," where some variance parameters are estimated as negative. In such cases, it has been suggested that the offending estimates could be fixed to zero with minimal harm to the program.
  • Missing Data
solution 1 diagnostics
Solution 1 - Diagnostics
  • Multi-collinearity
  • Missing Values
solution 2
Solution 2
  • Provide starting values
  • ST .5 ALL
  • ST .6 BE(2,1) LY(1,3) …
  • in SIMPLIS, write starting values un equations in parentheses followed by an asterisk (*)

TotalScore = (1)* Verbal

TotalScore = 1*Verbal

solutions 3
Solutions 3
  • Try other estimation methods
  • IV
  • 2SLS
  • OLS
sidestepping the problem

In LISREL, OU RC= c

Sidestepping the Problem
  • make a ridge adjustment to the covariance or correlation matrix. This involves adding some quantity to the diagonal elements of the matrix. This addition has the effect of attenuating the estimated relations between variables. A large enough addition is sure to result in a positive definite matrix. The price of this adjustment, however, is bias in the parameter estimates, standard errors, and fit indices.

a constant times the diagonal of S is added to S

repeat 10 times until the matrix becomes positive-definite

computing problem 2 negative error variance
Computing Problem 2:Negative error variance
  • construct with only one indicator
  • too many latent variables for one indicator
example 1
Example 1
  • sab1.spl - syntax errors
  • sab2.spl (created latent vars) – still problem
  • sab3.spl (use Correlation matrix) – negative error variance
  • sab4.spl (set error variance as .001, ok)

Correlation matrix and set error var as 0

Solves the problem.

example 2
Example 2

Step by step

diagnostics

  • bollen80.ls8 (no method factors, ok)
  • bollen80f1.ls8 (with all methods in, not working)
  • bollen80f1t.ls8 (simplify, works)
  • (then, add to move up)
  • bollen80f2.ls8 - okay
bollen s model
Bollen’s model

Democratic

Rule

Political

Liberties

x8

x5

x6

x7

x1

x2

x3

x4

Gastil

Banks

Sussman

mtmm multi traits multi methods
MTMM – Multi-traits Multi Methods
  • Convergent validity – high correlation of indicators from diff methods for the same trait
  • Discriminant validity – low correlation of indicators from same methods for diff traits
references for bollen s example
References for Bollen’s Example
  • Kenneth Bollen 1993 Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures. American Journal of Political Science, Vol 37 (November) 1207-1230
  • Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley 1989
  • Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage Publications 1993
kline s list of 35 ways to mislead us
Kline’s list of 35 ways to mislead us
  • 3. Fail to have sufficient numbers of indicators of latent variables
  • 7. Overfit the model
  • 8. Add disturbance or measurement error correlations without substantive reasons
  • ……
slide18
More
  • 26. Interpret good fit as meaning that the model is “proved”.
slide19
More
  • 34. Fail to provide enough information so that your reader can reproduce your results
model validation
Model validation
  • Estimation methods always minimize residuals
  • CVI = F(Sv, Σ) – (1/2nv)k(k+1)
  • where F is the fit function, Sv is the covariance matrix or correlation matrix of the validation sample, and Σ is the covariance (correlation) matrix fitted in the exploration sample under the model. The last matrix is saved in a file by including the line: Save Sigma in File SIGMA2
cross validation program sample
Cross Validation Program Sample
  • Cross-Validating Panel Model 2
  • Observed Variables from File PANEL.LAB
  • Correlation Matrix from File PANELUSA.PMV
  • Sample Size 395
  • Crossvalidate File SIGMA2
  • End of Problem

Save Sigma from ex9b.spl

Use Ex9bcv.spl