1 / 7

A Work Schedule for Rural Development Section Osijek 2010. 03.30.

A Work Schedule for Rural Development Section Osijek 2010. 03.30. István Finta Ph.D. Centre for Regional Studies HAS finta@rkk.hu. Spatial delimitation.

sara-landry
Download Presentation

A Work Schedule for Rural Development Section Osijek 2010. 03.30.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Work Schedule for Rural Development SectionOsijek2010. 03.30. István Finta Ph.D. Centre for Regional Studies HAS finta@rkk.hu

  2. Spatial delimitation • The specification of elements necessary for the spatial delimitation of Leader type cooperation and the formulation of its potential spatial units on the Croatian side; • Guidelines, experiences and problems of spatial delimitation on the Hungarian side; • Result: 1. a guideline for spatial delimitation and the concrete spatial units • 2. The presentation of Hungarian experiences

  3. The identification of potential beneficiaries and LAG (Local Action Group) members • Local, regional actors from civil, public and entrepreneurial sectors ready to participate in planning, in the new organizational structure who also may be the potential beneficiaries of the program. • Identification of elements and methods serving for the stakeholders’ cooperation. (Meetings, forums, announcements, etc.)

  4. Programming • Specification of requirements against local programmes; • Specification of the scheduling and major cornerstones of the whole programming process; Common work based on Hungarian – improved - practice and adjusted to the Croatian needs and possibilities resulting in: • Elaborating a program scheme with a timing plan.

  5. Best and worst practices • The presentation and analysis of some best and worst practices in Hungarian Leader+ areas. The analysis of current strategies. • The presentation of some development success or failure stories in Croatian areas in the fields of micro-enterprises, tourism and local development. • Result: developing an evaluation system – containing concrete case studies – both on Croatian and Hungarian side which may successfully be exploited by both parties in programming and in the planning of concrete projects.

  6. Central government’s regulation system • The presentation of the major elements of the Hungarian institutional- procedural- and financing system. • Result: preparation of a proposal for the possible frameworks and elements of the Croatian Leader Program with special regards to avoiding those errors that Hungarians had already made.

  7. Thank you for your attention!

More Related