1 / 21

Browser vs. Client-based Freetoplay MMOs

Browser vs. Client-based Freetoplay MMOs. Jonah Hong ( Symbeyond ) and Frank Cartwright ( GamersFirst ). Jonah Hong. Frank Cartwright. VP, Product, Platform Development and Digital Marketing at Gamersfirst. VP Online Entertainment at GSN Television Network

sandro
Download Presentation

Browser vs. Client-based Freetoplay MMOs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Browser vs. Client-based Freetoplay MMOs Jonah Hong (Symbeyond) and Frank Cartwright (GamersFirst)

  2. Jonah Hong

  3. Frank Cartwright • VP, Product, Platform Development and Digital Marketing at Gamersfirst. • VP Online Entertainment at GSN Television Network • VP, Product Development and Engineering at Global Gaming League (GGL) • VP, Production for SkillJam Technologies (Liberty Media Company) • Disney Internet Group (DIG) - Created Disney’s online, multi-player gaming platform along with dozens of games. • Began 15 year career in gaming in 1995 on PC CD-Rom game developed for Turner Interactive called DINOTOPIA.

  4. Overview • Based on a panel from GDC Europe where participants included • Kevin Xu (IGG Inc.) • Rob Ollett (Bigpoint International) • Patrick Streppel (gamigo AG) • Markus Buchtmann (SevenOne Intermedia) • Frank Cartwright (K2 Network GamersFirst)

  5. Portfolio Trends • GamersFirst – • Current - 12 games (9 client, 3 browser) • Last Year - Added browser in last year • Going Forward - 50/50 • IGG • Current - 25 games (12 client, 5 browser 8 Social) • Last Year - Browser and Social games • Going Forward - Same percentage

  6. Portfolio Trends • Proseiben/SevenGames • Current - 28 Games(20 browser / 8 client) • Last Year – 2nd year of Browser Games • Going Forward – More focused on browser • Gamigo • Current - 15 Client Games • Last Year - Moving towards browser • Going Forward – 75/25 Browser

  7. Portfolio Trends • Bigpoint • Current - 5 client the rest Browser • Last Year – Started Client • Going Forward - Primarily Browser

  8. Why Browser? • Greater Accessibility • Smaller Download • Less funnel friction • No native installation • Lower Development Cost (Godswar only $800k USD) • Quicker ROI

  9. Why Client? • Higher Quality • Longer Tail • Proven Monetization • Higher ARPU • $40 for client vs <$10 for browser

  10. User Acquisition / Conversion to Pay • All agree that funnel is better browser games. • Client 2-6% conversion to paying users (IGG/GamersFirst)

  11. Download Size • Client games currently 500MB – >10GB • Max Size Depends on Demographic and Location • US/EU Core Games < 2GB • US/EU Casual Games < 1GB (pref. < 500MB)

  12. Quality • Browser • Has improved at greater rate than client games over the last 2 years. • Better fit for casual and social games • Will continue to close the gap. • Client • Still better especially for core games • Engines like Unreal 3 continue to break new ground.

  13. Browser Platforms • Flash – Will continue to lose marketshare • Unity – Emerging as the clear leader and best technology • Trinigy – Good technology but may not be able catch up with Unity

  14. Publisher/Developer Integration • Browser games much easier • Browser game developers usually much more familiar with web technologies and therefore the integration with publisher. • Less risk and barriers to easily makes enhancements and changes.

  15. Multiplatform • Browser games have clear edge. • Client games are very customized • A big contributor to the strength of Unity is the cross-platform support including iPhone. • Mitigates risk by not forcing a choice of type of platform to target.

  16. Fraud, Hacking and Trust • Users feel much more comfortable with browser games since they are not installing native code • Equal opportunity for fraud and hacking. • Less control with browser games if exploit leverages browser layer.

  17. Hybrid • New opportunity • Start on browser • Committed players move to larger client-based version

  18. Conclusion • Trend is moving towards browser • Client not going away • There is much browser games can learn from client monetization • Huge opportunity for disruptive hybrid model.

  19. Contact • Jonah Hong • Frank Cartwright • frank@gamersfirst.com • 310-902-6613

  20. Thank You GDC China

More Related