300 likes | 380 Views
This study explores the relationship between reflectivity and rainfall along with the impact of Drop Size Distribution variations during storms on rainfall estimation accuracy. It investigates using meteorological parameters to explain discrepancies in Z/R relationships and assesses the influence of hydrometeor characteristics on rainfall estimation. The research examines the use of Lightning Metrics as a proxy to determine convective activity in storms. Statistical analyses are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methods in enhancing rainfall estimation accuracy.
E N D
By: Jeana Mascio Radar Reflectivity (Z) and Rainfall (R) Relationships in Central FloridaPart II
The Point Want to be more accurate with estimating rainfall amounts from Z/R relationships
The Point Want to be more accurate with estimating rainfall amounts from Z/R relationships Drop Size Distribution (DSD) variations in storms causes most inaccuracies
The Point Want to be more accurate with estimating rainfall amounts from Z/R relationships Drop Size Distribution (DSD) variations in storms causes most inaccuracies Use meteorological parameters that may infer DSD
The Point Want to be more accurate with estimating rainfall amounts from Z/R relationships Drop Size Distribution (DSD) variations in storms causes most inaccuracies Use meteorological parameters that may infer DSD Determine if these parameters can explain the discrepancies from Z/R relationship
The Point Want to be more accurate with estimating rainfall amounts from Z/R relationships Drop Size Distribution (DSD) variations in storms causes most inaccuracies Use meteorological parameters that may infer DSD Determine if these parameters can explain the discrepancies from Z/R relationship If results are found, could change the relationship
Drop Size Distribution (DSD) • Defines hydrometeor size, shape, orientation and phase • Each storm type, as well as phase of storm, has a different DSD • Affects Z/R relationship Both boxes have the same reflectivity measurement Box 2 will give the greater rainfall
Using the Horizontal Rain Gage • Horizontal gages collect different rain angles • Different directions represent the u- and v-components North = + v South = - v East = + u West = - u
How Horizontal Gage Works Example: If rain came directly from the North, this direction gage would only collect rain… only v-component would have a value.
Calculating Terminal Velocity Rain Angle Unknown… Rain rate Infer a terminal velocity Wind velocity
Finding Mean Drop Size • Calculated terminal velocities can give a mean drop size • Mean drop size gives information on the DSD
Terminal Velocity that best • matches 7/11 observations is • between 4 and 4.6 m/s
Terminal Velocity that best • matches 7/11 observations is • between 4 and 4.6 m/s • From previous table: • 4.03 m/s 1.0 mm mean drop size
Using Drop Size Data • Could classify measured drop sizes into storm types and storm phases if more data was collected • Use classification to compare to the Z/R relationship • Possible correlations to either an over- or under-estimation of rainfall from relationship
Use Lightning Metrics as a Proxy • Lightning Metrics : • Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) • Equilibrium Level temperature (EL) • Lightning Flash Rate (LFR) • All help to determine if storms are convectively active
CAPE Measured by upper-air balloon soundings • The potential an area of upper atmosphere has to produce convective storms • Higher CAPE convection more likely
EL Measured by upper-air balloon soundings • The estimated temperature of possible storm cloud-top
Lightning Flash Rate (LFR) • Measured by the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network Database (NLDN) • Collects location, time, polarity and amplitude of each cloud-to-ground strike • Methods: • Tabulated flash count for each system • Specified radius (5, 10 km) for varying circular areas
Comparing Metrics to Z/R • Compared data to rainfall rate departure = difference between the observed rainfall rate and rate that the reflectivities estimated by NWS relationship (shown with red arrows on a cut-off portion of Z/R relationship graph)
Comparing Metrics to Z/R • Compared data to rainfall rate departure • Best results came from CAPE and 10 km LFR • Divided CAPE/10 km LFR into 2 groups: • CAPE: high and low (dividing value = 2950 J/kg) • 10 km LFR: zero and some lightning
Statistical Analysis • Statistical T-tests completed for CAPE and 10 km LFR • Determined if there is any statistical difference between mean departures of groups for both metrics • P-value less than or equal to 0.05 allows rejection that groups are equal
CAPE T-test Results • No statistical support allows the statement that these two means are different
10 km LFR T-test Results • There is about 90% confidence that these two means are different • Not enough for the 0.05 confidence value
Conclusions • Rainfall rate mean departures for both groups in both metrics cannot be claimed different • But results of 10 km LFR were close to confidence value • No new Z/R relationships can be inferred from the results • Could study other seasons throughout entire year; different storm types • Measure DSD with a disdrometer
Questions? Next: Sarah Collins