70 likes | 168 Views
TUT's tasks include estimating immediate consequences of ship accidents, identifying accident probabilities and scenarios, evaluating impacts on the ecosystem, and defining damage scenarios for a developed assessment model. The tool provides detailed analysis through simulation models, allowing for precise but time-consuming evaluations or fast but less accurate assessments. Two approaches are utilized: a two-stage model for high-precision simulations and a single-stage model for quick evaluations. The tool aims to enhance understanding of ship damage in various scenarios and improve simulation efficiency.
E N D
WP 4: Assessment of environmental and economic risksTasks of TUT Kristjan Tabri
WP4: TUT main tasks in general TUT Estimation of immediate consequences of ship accidents Accident probabilities and scenarios Overall impacts on the ecosystem Definition of the scenario Description of damage
Milestones 1 2 3-4 5-6 7-8 Identification of the input and output parameters for the model to asses ship structural damage in a certain accidental scenario Identification simulation models for the assessment of structural damage: models allowing precise but time wise expensive simulation and those allowing fast but less accurate evaluation Definition of the approach for the assessment of structural damage in a range of accidental scenarios Testing and validation of the tool. A paper based on the developed consequence analysis model. Scientific paper about the integrated model
Estimation of immediate consequences of ship accidents • To provide a tool that describes the damage a ship experiences in a certain accidental scenario • The main issues at the moment • level of accuracy • identification of required set of input/output parameters in conjunction with other subroutines for risk analysis • number of accidental scenarios to be analyzed in a typical run • time-efficiency of the simulation tool
Two possible approaches damage ship C ship B ship A scenario Slow calculation (finite element method) Fast calculation (semi-analytical method) Approach 1 : two-stage model The two-stage approach implies that only a small number of accidental scenarios are simulated at high precision and the rest are predicted with a simplified model that is calibrated based on these precise simulations Existing model can evaluate the damage in a wide variety of scenarios, but requires calibration input from at least 1 accidental scenario per ship i.e. The level of structural resistance has to be used as input - The evaluation of the level of structural resistance is time consuming +The overall outcome is relatively precise
Two possible approaches damage ship C ship B ship A scenario Fast calculation (semi-analytical method) Approach 2 : single-stage model The single-stage approach implies that all the all of accidental scenarios are simulated with a simplified model The simplified model requires a module for fast assessment of the level of structural resistance - The outcome is less precise compared to the two-stage model +The whole simulation process isfaster