E N D
1. Improving Healthcare for Latinos March 27, 2010 Michael A. Rodríguez, MD, MPH
Professor and Vice Chair of Research
George F. Kneller Endowed Chair in Family Medicine
UCLA Department of Family Medicine
2. Acknowledgements Network for Multicultural Research on Health and Healthcare funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
4. Geographic Location of Latinos in the US
5. Migration Patterns Among Latinos 1995-2000
6. Stats about US Latinos More than 1 in 5 children is Latino1
38% (18 million people) are immigrants2
Majority have lived in the US for more than 10 years2
66% were of Mexican origin, 9% Puerto Rican origin, 3% Cuban and 3% Salvadoran origin3
7. Latino Epidemiological Paradox 34% Lower heart disease mortality
43% Lower cancer mortality
24% Lower stroke mortality
Identical low infant mortality
8. Immigrants Face many Challenges Low Socio-economic Status
Living conditions
Nutrition
Low educational attainment
Language
10. Four Areas of Unmet Health Care Needs Low quality of health care
Inadequate health insurance coverage
Language barriers in the US healthcare delivery system
Lack of diversity among healthcare professionals
11. Low Quality of Healthcare Poorer quality of health care than non-Latino Whites on 19 of 34 measures.
heart attacks, diabetes, pneumonia, htn, depression, HIV
Latino children also suffer disparities
shorter average visit duration, lower odds of receiving any counseling during well-child visits, less parental satisfaction, greater unmet need for mental health
12. Inadequate Health Insurance Coverage Latinos have the highest rates of being uninsured or underinsured
In 2008, 32% of Latinos, 19% of African Americans, and 18% of Asians in the US lacked health insurance, compared with 10% of non-Latino Whites.
13. Coverage is particularly low among undocumented immigrants
63% lack health insurance1
Latinos 65 years and older account for 64% of all uninsured older Americans2
14. Health Insurance, Access and Health Status of Children, by Parents’ Immigrant Status, 1999
15. Language Barriers Limited English proficiency (LEP)
lower quality of interpersonal care
lower patient satisfaction, excessive ordering of medical tests, lack of understanding of medication side effects and instructions, more frequent medical errors, decreased use of primary care, increased use of the emergency department, and inadequate follow-up.
quality is compromised and more costly
16. Language Access Issues Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, mandates that all healthcare providers receiving federal funding (including Medicare or Medicaid) provide adequate language services to all patients
Health care system serves nearly 16 million Latinos with LEP and 22 states have more than 100,000 residents who are LEP Spanish speakers.
17. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) allow states to include language services as an optional covered service under Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Only DC and 13 states (Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming) provided 3rd party reimbursement for language services through Medicaid and CHIP in 2009
18. Lack of diversity among Healthcare Professionals Minority patients are more satisfied with the health care when received from minority professionals of the same ethnicity
Latinos are significantly underrepresented in the health professional workforce in all US states.
Latinos account for only 3.5% of physicians, 2.0% of registered nurses
19. Healthcare Environment Supply of clinicians
The clinical environment
Accessibility to healthcare providers
21. Policy Priorities to Improve Access to and Quality of Health Care for Latinos
22. Two Visions of America Integration model: wants to invest in immigrants; views immigrants as a vital part of our society; recognizes economic, social and cultural contributions of immigrants to U.S. society.
Marginalization model: wants to reverse the flow of immigration; creates division between immigrants and citizens, documented and undocumented immigrants, population stalls.
23. Implications of the Federal Debate on Immigration Regardless of the outcome, immigrant families will continue to represent a significant portion of our workforce, child and student population
Continued investment in immigrant services will maximize contributions to the general public health, increase families’ self-sufficiency, reduce SS shortfall
25. Provide Affordable Health Insurance Coverage to All US Residents
26. Enhance the Delivery of Linguistically Appropriate Care Require reimbursement for language services and enforce adherence
Improve and disseminate services for interpretation
27. Diversify the Healthcare and Research Workforce Pipeline with stronger gov’t support
IMG option
28. Improve Data and Systems to Define and Monitor Disparities Affecting Latinos
Support recommendations 2009 IOM report on Race, Ethnicity and Language Data
29. Conclusions Severe disparities in health care
Contribute to future excess morbidity or mortality, as well as increased exposure to infectious diseases and higher healthcare costs for all
Need for equitable distribution of resources, including health insurance for the entire US population,
Such policy efforts at the federal, regional and local health system levels will improve the quality of health care for Immigrants and all Americans
30. Thank You Michael A. Rodríguez, MD, MPH
E-mail: MRodriguez@mednet.ucla.edu