1 / 16

5 April 2019 – Step Mauritius

5 April 2019 – Step Mauritius. Fiduciary and Trust litigation: How to avoid it. Peter Gillis, Stephenson Harwood LLP. Introduction. Different types of trust dispute Guidance for trustees facing each type of trust dispute and how they may be able to protect themselves Recent cases in 2018.

ronniep
Download Presentation

5 April 2019 – Step Mauritius

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 5 April 2019 – Step Mauritius Fiduciary and Trust litigation: How to avoid it Peter Gillis, Stephenson Harwood LLP

  2. Introduction • Different types of trust dispute • Guidance for trustees facing each type of trust dispute and how they may be able to protect themselves • Recent cases in 2018

  3. Types of trust dispute • ‘Trust’ dispute – dispute about the terms or administration of the trust • Questions regarding the construction of the trust instrument • How should the trustee exercise its powers? • ‘Hostile’ trust disputes • ‘Beneficiary’ dispute – dispute arising from a beneficiary alleging misconduct/breach of trust • ‘Third party’ dispute – bringing or defending claims from/against third parties

  4. Type 1: ‘Trust’ disputes How to approach a ‘trust’ dispute • Main concern is the risk of acting in breach of trust • Possible options for the trustee are: • 1. Go ahead and act • 2. Obtain the consent of the beneficiaries • 3. Obtain directions from the court • England – Civil Procedure Rules • Mauritius – Section 62 of the Trusts Act 2001

  5. Type 1: ‘Trust’ disputes Directions of the court • Questions of construction of the trust instrument • Guidance to the trustee in the exercise of its powers: • ‘Blessing’ applications – where there is no real doubt, but a decision is ‘momentous’ • Court is principally concerned with: • Rationality • Honesty • Surrender of discretion cases

  6. Type 1: ‘Trust’ disputes Recent cases from 2018 • South Downs Trustees Ltd v GH [2018] EWHC 1064 (Ch) – England and Wales • Trustee held 73% of the shares in a holding company • Trustee received an offer to purchase underlying business • Offer was a better outcome for beneficiaries than if business remained in trust and the trustee decided to accept • Trustee sought judicial blessing of decision • Court granted the application • The court found the trustee had taken a “structured and logical” approach • Potential conflict of interest was carefully investigated and managed

  7. Type 1: ‘Trust’ disputes Recent cases from 2018 • Re H Trust [2018] JRC 171 - Jersey • Trust asset was a residential property in London worth £1m • Illiquid with £112k of outstanding management fees owed to the trustee • Trustee wanted to sell property and distribute proceeds • Trustee applied to court for directions – it was opposed by all beneficiaries • Court found: • Trustee had not dealt with the conflict of interest – this was fatal to the application • Trustee had not obtained tax advice • Trustee needed to give reasonable time to beneficiaries to identify an alternate funding proposal

  8. Type 2 ‘beneficiary’ disputes • Hostile disputes between the Beneficiaries and the trustees founded on allegations of misconduct • Examples include: • Negligent management of trust assets • Not acting impartially between beneficiaries • Distributing funds to someone not within the beneficial class • Acting without taking tax advice

  9. Type 2 ‘beneficiary’ dispute How to protect against a ‘beneficiary’ dispute • Prevention is better than cure • Ensure there are adequate protections in the trust deed: • Exoneration provisions • ‘Anti-Bartlett’ clauses • Duty to diversify assets • ‘Undo’ transactions in breach of duty using doctrines of: • Equitable mistake • The ‘Re Hastings Bass’ Principle

  10. Type 2 – ‘Beneficiary’ disputes ‘Undoing’ transactions • Mistake: Transaction may be set aside where there is a discrepancy between the trustee’s intentions and the effect of the transaction • Re Hastings Bass: Transaction may be set aside where: • The Trustee has done something within the terms of its power • The trustee has failed to take relevant considerations into account - this must amount to a breach of duty • Doctrine narrowed following English Supreme Court decision in Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26

  11. Type 2 – ‘Beneficiary’ disputes Recent cases from 2018 • M v St Anne’s Trustees Ltd - Guernsey • Beneficiary borrowed from trust to fund a divorce payment • Beneficiary repaid loan with transfer of companies to the trust worth more than the loan • Trustee made balancing payment which triggered significant income tax liability • Trustee sought to set aside the transaction under the Re Hasting Bass principle

  12. Type 2 –’Beneficiary’ disputes Recent cases from 2018 • M v St Anne’s Trustees Ltd - Guernsey • First Guernsey case following English Supreme court decision in Pitt v Holt • First instance court refused application on basis it would be “unconscionable” • Guernsey Court of Appeal: • Proceeded on assumption that Guernsey law would follow Pitt v Holt • No “unconscionability” requirement • Codification in other jurisdictions

  13. Type 3 - ‘third party’ disputes Issues for the trustee in a ‘third’ party dispute • Trustee bringing or defending claims against third parties • Main issue for trustee is to ensure that it is indemnified • Normal cost rules will apply in litigation (loser pays) • Indemnity from the trust? • Apply to court for a “Beddoe” order to protect the trustee • Procedure is a mini trial • Normally made before the third party claim is started

  14. Type 3 – ‘third party’ disputes Recent cases from 2018 • The Stingray Trust 2018– Cayman • Proceedings attacking trust issued in Switzerland • The trustee defended the claim • Shortly after the Swiss proceedings were dismissed the trustee applied for “Beddoe” relief • Before it could be heard similar proceedings were issued in Milan • Court granted “Beddoe” application: • It was necessary to defend the application as there was a substantial risk to the trust – although sanction was not open ended • Failure to apply prior to defending Swiss proceedings was understandable

  15. Type 3 “third party” disputes Recent cases from 2018 • Investec Trust (Guernsey) Ltd v. Glenalla Properties Ltd [2018] UKPC 7 • Mauritius – Section 36(1) Trusts Act 2001

  16. Fiduciary and Trust litigation: How to avoid it Peter Gillis Stephenson Harwood LLP +44 207 809 2221 Peter.Gillis@shlegal.com

More Related