1 / 17

“ F orbidden decays in 2014: material for discussion ”

“ F orbidden decays in 2014: material for discussion ”. Gianluca Lamanna & Tommaso Spadaro (Pisa & LNF) PhysSensy - NA62 Liverpool Meeting 28.08.2012. DISCLAIMER: PUT A BIG ~ IN FRONT ANY NUMBER. Figure of merit (according to Giuseppe) 10% of nominal intensity:

ria-english
Download Presentation

“ F orbidden decays in 2014: material for discussion ”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Forbiddendecays in 2014: material for discussion” Gianluca Lamanna & Tommaso Spadaro (Pisa & LNF) PhysSensy - NA62 Liverpool Meeting 28.08.2012

  2. DISCLAIMER: PUT A BIG ~ IN FRONT ANY NUMBER

  3. Figure of merit (according to Giuseppe) • 10% of nominal intensity: • On average, due to different reasons (technical, detectors, problems,…) • 60 days of data taking: • Very good data taking efficiency (good SPS, effective runs, …) • 10 KHz of data written on disk: • No limitation from the infrastructure 2014

  4. Interestingforbiddendecays (1)

  5. Interestingforbiddendecays (2)

  6. NA62 prospects • * Roughestimation • ** SeeEvgueni

  7. NA62 prospects • * assuming 20% trigger efficiency • ** assuming 1% trigger efficiency

  8. The L0 Bandwidth 1 MHz • Main trigger pnn: • Q1*RICH*!MUV3*!LKR*!LAV 320 kHz • Q1*RICH*!LKR*!LAV*!MIP*ETOT380kHz • Let me assume that the total pnn trigger rate is 400 kHz. • Let me assume that at L1/L2 we will have additional 10/10 reduction factors. pnn • Assuming 1 MHz L0 readout bandwidth there are 600 kHz for: • Control triggers • Triggers to study detectors and background • Calibration & random • Other rare kaon decays (K->pp0g, K->pp0ee, Ke4n, …) • Forbiddens and exotics Kaon and p0 [All numbers from Spasimir]

  9. Filling the L0: Q1/DW ppD: 4% 3p: 96% 3trk pp0: 21% Halo: 28% pnn 1trk Km2: 42% Other: 9% L0 : pnn .OR. Q1/DW (DW=13)

  10. Very inefficient L0 for most of the decays • Big downscaling • 42% of Q1 coming from Halo+Km2 • Only the 70% of the Q1 from decays are in the decay region. • Change approach • Consider selective trigger for physics • Maintain a «quota» of generic (Q1) 1trk and 3trks decays for detector study In decayregion Halo+Km2 pnn

  11. K->pg, p->ggg, p->gggg,p->nn, sgoldstino 1 trk Forbiddens and exotics LFV (pme), p0->me, dark photon, Axions, p0->ee, sgoldstino 3trks multi trks p->eeee

  12. Forbidden 1 trk: F1TRK • L0: • the main trigger (pnn) has some efficiency for F1TRKdecays (ex: 40% for K->pg,100% for p0->nn) • DedicatedF1TRK: Q1*RICH32*!MUV3*!LAV is the startingpoint (500kHz). Tight !MIP*ETOT*NLKR? • RICHGPU: reconstruct the missing mass of the p+ (Elena) • L1/2: decayvertex+LKr • Some studiesalreadydone by Tommaso and Elisa: • p0->3g 4kHz (28%) • p0->4g 17 kHz (18%) Proposal: 7.2 MHz 1 kHz 50 kHz L1/L2 L0

  13. Forbidden 3 trks: F3TRK • L0: • Starting point Q1*RICH>20*!LAV (>1 MHz) • Possibility to exploit the asymmetry on the RICH illumination to trigger on three tracks (P.Cooper – note (draft)) • Define triggers exploiting event topology and different detectors  dilepton triggers (Evgueni), Dark Photon (Bruno), … • Attempt to have a single strobe to L1 using GPU (next slide) • Higher efficiency (to be studied) • Smaller use of the L0 bandwidth • L1/L2: decay vertex+PID+Total Energy+… Proposal: 1 kHz 0.5 MHz 50 kHz L1/L2 L0

  14. example For each 3 rings event build the following quantities: 1 2 • If for (mp,mp,mp) A is close to the transverse momentum of the kaon the event will be rejected • Simulation needed to understand resolution, rejection power and efficiency. 3 Where (m1, m2, m3) are the particles masses mp,mm,me

  15. Twoscenarios • High intensity • Standard trigger configuration: pnn + F1TRK + F3TRK + FMTRK + OTHER/D1 + Q1/D2 + NHOD/D3 + CAL + RND • Low intensity (10%) • In principle it’s possible to think about an alternative trigger scheme (either changing D1,D2,D3 or changing cuts in order to increase the single trigger efficiency) Q1/50 Q1/50 pnn pnn F1/3TRK F1/3TRK

  16. Conclusions • Assuming limited statistics in 2014, we will be competitive only on few forbidden decay modes. • Dedicatedtriggers to collectForbiddens and exotics: • Significantoverlap with othertriggers for physics and trigger for detector studies • In any case to study high efficiency low bandwidth dedicated parasitic triggers (for any channels), we could profit from the first phase of data collection. • It’s not a loss of time to collect data for all the decay modes.

More Related