110 likes | 270 Views
IssuesSAS 112OIG areas of focusUCR areas of concern and what is being done to address themUpdateSubrecipient monitoring guidelines. SAS 112. Statement of Auditing Standards 112Establishes standards for communicating internal control issues relating to:Integrity of financial reportingComp
E N D
1. Post Award Issues and UpdatesJanuary 10, 2008Bobbi McCrackenAssistant Vice Chancellor for Financial Servicesand Bruce MorganAssistant Vice Chancellor for Research
2. Issues
SAS 112
OIG – areas of focus
UCR – areas of concern and what is being done to address them
Update
Subrecipient monitoring guidelines
3. SAS 112 Statement of Auditing Standards 112
Establishes standards for communicating internal control issues relating to:
Integrity of financial reporting
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations
Control issues must be disclosed to the Regents and UCR’s sponsors
4. SAS 112 Establishes standards for classifying control issues
Control deficiencies
Significant deficiencies
Material weaknesses
SAS 112 has been incorporated in the Government Auditing Standards
Applicable to UC’s FY 08 A-133 audit
5. SAS 112 What does SAS 112 mean for UCR?
Larger audit samples
Increased scrutiny
Require more audit evidence and documentation
Increased likelihood of control issues being reported
6. SAS 112 Potential impact on UCR
Adversely effect sponsored program funding
Negative publicity and diminishing reputation
Loss of public support
Increase in external audits
Audit disallowances
Fines and penalties
7. OIG – Areas of Focus NSF OIG
Thematic focus
Taxpayer investment
Financial & programmatic accountability
Salaries and wages claimed by universities
Effort reporting at major universities
Audit of select awards to universities
Focusing on grantee systems to safeguard and account for NSF funds
Desk reviews of grantee A-133 audit reports
8. OIG – Areas of Focus HHS – OIG
Grantee management of conflicts of interest
Review the nature of reported interests in FY 06 and how institutions managed the conflicts
Review how NIH managed grantee compliance
University administrative & clerical salaries
Review will encompass grants, cooperative agreements and contracts at selected universities
Colleges’ and Universities’ compliance with cost principles
Reviews will be conducted at selected institutions
9. UCR – Areas of Concern Effort reporting
Incomplete / missing, late
Cost transfers
High volume, timeliness & documentation
Subrecipient monitoring
Cost sharing
Compliance with cost principles & reporting
Award close-out
Delinquent financial and technical reports
10. Addressing the Concerns Training
Expanding campus sponsored programs training program
Roles and responsibilities document
Effective information & training tool
Mitigating factor for fines & penalties
Electronic tools
Implement new on-line effort reporting
Including cost sharing component
Ledger reconciliation and review system
11. UCR subrecipient monitoring weakness appeared in the UC FY 05 A-133 report
Hired Subrecipient Monitoring Coordinator
Strengthened OR’s internal procedures to ensure appropriate institutional-level monitoring
Developed monitoring guidelines for PIs and units – near final draft Subrecipient Monitoring Guidelines
12. Questions?