1 / 1

Benthic forams /fish-teeth ( ) record -9.4 ε Nd

Reconstructing Mediterranean-Atlantic exchange: Can Nd isotopes tell us about the Messinian Salinity Crisis?. Ruža F. Ivanović, Rachel Flecker , Marcus Gutjahr , Paul J. Valdes. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK : Ruza.Ivanovic@bristol.ac.uk.

renata
Download Presentation

Benthic forams /fish-teeth ( ) record -9.4 ε Nd

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reconstructing Mediterranean-Atlantic exchange: Can Nd isotopes tell us about the Messinian Salinity Crisis? Ruža F. Ivanović, Rachel Flecker, Marcus Gutjahr, Paul J. Valdes School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK : Ruza.Ivanovic@bristol.ac.uk 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODS • Mediterranean water (38 g/l,) is denser than Atlantic water (36 g/l) [e.g. 12]. Nd isotopes are used to distinguish between these water masses. • Two way-flow through the gateway(s): • Occurs today & thought to be the normal state of exchange 8-5 Ma • Benthic forams[15] & fish-teeth[16] record the Med. water signal = -9.4 εNd • Flow from Atlantic to Mediterranean: • Thought to have occurred periodically during the MSC (Fig. 2) • Brings salt into the Med., but no salt is exported, resulting in salt precipitation • Benthic forams[15] & fish-teeth[16] record the Atlantic water signal = -11.8 εNd Nd is used to trace water masses [13-20] We aim: to understand what caused the Messinian Salinity Crisis. To do this, we use Nd isotopes to reconstruct the exchange of water between the Mediterranean Sea & Atlantic Ocean 8-5 Ma. Nd in water comes from weathered crust Distinct εNd per water mass -11.8 εNd ↓εNd = older crust -9.4 εNd Nd recorded in forams& fish-teeth Neodymium (Nd) = rare earth element Benthic forams/fish-teeth ( ) record -9.4 εNd -11.8 εNd CHUR = present day bulk earth[18] Measure εNd on mass spectrometer Physical, reductive & oxidative cleaning of sample[17] Benthic forams/fish-teeth ( ) record -11.8 εNd 3. RESULTS: Reconstructing bottom water flow direction 4. CONCLUSIONS • We present a reconstruction of bottom water flow-direction between the Mediterranean & Atlantic • Our new data tests the hypotheses proposed to explain the older sedimentary formations in the Messinian stratigraphy, as shown in Figure 2 • For the periods 7.7-7.1 Ma & 6.4-5.6 Ma bottom water flow was predominantly east to west (Med. Outflow) • The very radiogenic signal recorded by Zobzit samples from 7.20 Ma reflect the local tectonic and volcanic changes leading to closure of the Taza-Guercif basin • Following this methodology, we believe that a more definitive chronology of changes in Mediterranean-Atlantic water exchange can be constructed We compare our measured εNd (coloured circles & rectangles) to εNd estimated from the hypotheses shown in Fig. 2 (shaded grey). • This gap in the data spans the Mediterranean’s period of halite precipitation (when salinity reached ~ 380 g/l) and near freshening. • Samples have been obtained from the Loulja A & B sections to cover this. • Because of this gap in the data we cannot test Benson’s[11] Siphon Event hypothesis (Figure 2), where the εNd signal should be Atlantic. • To get this data, sample is needed from the Messadit section. • This is one of the focuses for future work and part of the purpose of fieldwork being undertaken in May 2011. Figure 1. During the MSC, Mediterranean-Atlantic water exchange occurred through the Betic (S. Spain) and Rifian (N. Morocco) Corridors[1-6]. Sample site locations are indicated. Future work will target current gaps in the data Hypotheses 5. FUTURE WORK • These data support the occurrence of small-scale outflow during gypsum deposition rather than total cessation of Mediterranean Outflow (Figure 2). • Establish whether or not shallow surface flow can be detected in planktic forams. • Determine the reliability of the results[22,23] by comparing elemental ratios (including Fe:Ca & Mn:Ca) • Complete the time-series of Rifian bottom water εNd, spanning 8-5 Ma, with improved temporal resolution & covering the current gaps in the time-series • Carry out fieldwork (N. Morocco) to collect the samples (e.g. from Messadit) needed for these further analyses Messinian Salinity Crisis extremely radiogenic εNd at Zobzit ~7.20 Ma Messinian Salinity Crisis • The extremely radiogenic εNd values measured in Zobzit samples from ~ 7.20 Ma coincide with a rapid shallowing of the Taza-Guercif basin, which preceded the ultimate closure of this part of the corridor[21]. • This shallowing has been attributed to tectonic activity (uplift) and falling glacio-eustatic sea levels[21] . • It could have isolated the basin from the sites of the other sections (e.g. OuedAkrech), or at least restricted their water exchange. • Localised volcanism associated with this tectonic activity & an increase in the influence of fluvial discharge could explain the extremely radiogenic εNd signal recorded in only the Zobzit samples ~ 7.20 Ma. • It could have been this event that initiated the Messinian Salinity Crisis21]. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the University of Bristol Centenary Scholarship, the Daniel Pidgeon Fund & the Phyllis Mary Morris Fund. We thank Dr. WoutKrijgsman & Dr. Fritz Hilgen (Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands) for providing samples. All Mass-spectroscopic analyses were carried out in the Bristol Isotope Group’s laboratories, University of Bristol, UK. Figure 2. Composite core from sections in the Mediterranean basin. Changes in Mediterranean-Atlantic water exchange have been evoked to explain the extreme salinity fluctuations of the MSC. Our εNd reconstruction tests these. [1-11] References Hilgen, F.J. et al. (2000), EPSL,182, 237-251. van derLann, E. et al. (2006), Paleoceanography, 21, PA3011. Krijgsman, W. et al. (2004), Stratigraphy, 1 (1), 87-101. Carnevale, G et al. (2006), J. Geol. Soc., 163, 75-80. Roveri, M. et al., (2008) Terra Nova, 20, 483-488. Krijgsman, W. et al., (2008) Marine Geology, 400, 652-655. Flecker, R. & Ellam, R.M., 2006, Sed. Geol. 188-189, 189-203. Benson, R.H. & Rakic-El Bied, K., 1991, Paleoceanog. 6, 164-192. Conkwright, M.E. et al. (2002) World Ocean Database. Spivack, A.J. & Wasserburg, G.J. (1988) Geochim. Cos. Acta, 52, 2767-2773 Tachikawa, K. et al. (2004) Geochim. Cos. Acta, 68, 3095-3106. Klevenz, V. et al., (2008) EPSL, 265, 571-587. Scher, H.D. & Martin, E.E., (2008) Paleoceanography, 23, PA1205. Vance, D. et al., (2004) Paleoceanography, 19, PA2009. Faure, G. & Mensing, T.M. (2005) Isotopes: Principles & Applications (3rd Ed). von Blanckenburg, F. (1999) Science, 286 (5446), 1862-1863. Arsouze, T. et al. (2007) Chemical Geology, 239, 165-177. Krijgsman, W. et al. (1999) Marine Geology,153 (1-4), 147-160. Stumpf et al. (2010) Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 2462-2472. Severman et al. (2010) GeochimicaCosmochimicaActa, 74, 14, 3984-4004. van Assen, E. et al. (2006), P3, 238, 15-31. Krijgsman, W. & Meijer, P.T. (2008), Marine Geology, 253, 73-81. Fortuin, A.R. & Krijgsman, W. (2003), Sedimentary Geology, 160, 213-242.

More Related