1 / 74

Jordan Goodman Department of Physics University of Maryland

Marquee Science & Technology Courses A successful example of cross-disciplinary course development. Jordan Goodman Department of Physics University of Maryland. November 2009. National need for an understanding of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)

rehan
Download Presentation

Jordan Goodman Department of Physics University of Maryland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Marquee Science & Technology Courses A successful example of cross-disciplinary course development Jordan Goodman Department of Physics University of Maryland November 2009

  2. National need for an understanding of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) • Cannot be addressed only by educating future scientists • The problem is deeper, more systemic, and solutions must extend to improved education for non-science majors.

  3. Discussion in the early spring of 07 • UG Dean Donna Hamilton, Jim Gates, and JG • Donna was concerned that many of our best students on campus never took science • Many would “AP” out of science when they came in • Many would be in majors like Business where more science wouldn’t be required • Donna organized a group (~15) of interested people who meet in the spring

  4. Call for Proposals from Undergraduate Studies: Signature program that: • Engages senior faculty • Creatively addresses the challenge • “Teach” the process of science • Elucidate how science addresses world problems • Satisfies General Education (CORE) expectations • Has departmental and college support • Deans picked from proposals Engages 100+ students

  5. How does science attack problems to which the answer is not known • Most (virtually all) science courses we teach are about subjects that the answers are known • Controversy is only presented historically and often parenthetically • Conclusions are offered as if any reasonable person would have figure it out themselves • Even subjects like relativity

  6. Summer 2007 – full day workshop Fall 2007-Present The Faculty became a Learning Community • Met regularly over lunch • Reviewed and discussed best practices • Shared ideas for engaging students in process of science • Agreed upon common attributes of courses • Developed learning goals and assessment measures • Met with advisors to foster full course enrollment

  7. The Marquee Faculty Associate & Full ProfessorsInterdisciplinary (3 colleges and 6 disciplines)

  8. Marquee Course Learning Goals At the completion of a Marquee Course in Science and Technology students will be able to: • Ask good questions (sense-making questions; e.g. questions that lead to increased understanding) • Relate science to a personal situation (Science is around them in their everyday life) • Find information using various sources and evaluate the veracity of the information (e.g. information literacy) • Look at complex questions (e.g. global warming, medical technology, biodiversity) and identify the science in the question and how it impacts and is impacted by political, social, economic, and ethical dimensions • Critically evaluate science arguments (e.g. those that are made in a news article, a student presentation, on a TV show, presented to a lay person by a physician etc) • Determine what they know and what they do not know. (Learn how to learn) • Communicate effectively ( to a variety of target audiences and within team situations) – engage in conversation with staff on Capitol Hill, explain a concept to peers).

  9. Marquee Course Learning Goals At the completion of a Marquee Course in Science and Technology students will be able to: • Ask good questions (sense-making questions; e.g. questions that lead to increased understanding) • Relate science to a personal situation (Science is around them in their everyday life) • Find information using various sources and evaluate the veracity of the information (e.g. information literacy) • Look at complex questions (e.g. global warming, medical technology, biodiversity) and identify the science in the question and how it impacts and is impacted by political, social, economic, and ethical dimensions • Critically evaluate science arguments (e.g. those that are made in a news article, a student presentation, on a TV show, presented to a lay person by a physician etc) • Determine what they know and what they do not know. (Learn how to learn) • Communicate effectively ( to a variety of target audiences and within team situations) – engage in conversation with staff on Capitol Hill, explain a concept to peers).

  10. First CORE courses offered by College of Engineering !

  11. Courses Piloted 2007-2008 • Met first year enrollment goals • Attracted non-majors *Other – category includes students from 7 colleges

  12. PHYS 105Physics for Decision Makers:The Global Energy Crisis • Steve Rolston • Jordan Goodman • Bill Dorland • Dan Lathrop • Department of Physics

  13. PHYS 105Physics for Decision Makers:The Global Energy Crisis • This topic could change: • Energy • Transportation • Materials • Space

  14. Learn physics of energy in the context of the global energy crisis and the real world • Physics • Biology • Economics • Politics Energy concepts Population and growth Fossil Fuels Global warming Energy sources Possible outcomes/solutions

  15. We ran pilot as honors course • Bill Dorland taught the prototype as an honors course (Fall 07) • Our group met weekly to discuss course • We wanted to learn what the best students could do in a small setting before trying it on a large class • I taught the 60 student version (non-honors) in Spring 08 • We expanded it to 110 in Fall 08 • Added a new colleague (Lathrop) in 2010

  16. Course structured with two 75 min. lectures and one 50 min. group (20 student) sections • Extended group projects (4-5 students) • Expose students to technology • Small group activities rather than traditional “recitation” sections

  17. Assigned seating in lecture according to discussion group • Think, pair, share works only if they are willing to talk to each other

  18. TA involvement and buy-in is essential • This is a different kind of TA assignment • I had two good TAs • One got it • The other… • This was an excellent way for them to learn • We are working on creating a Marquee TA program

  19. Energy Audit Project (major group activity) • Students are given access to University web-based metering system for campus buildings • Collect (real world) data • Analyze a building usage with walkthrough • Prepare a report for suggested energy savings • Results are submitted onto a Wiki • PowerPoint final presentation

  20. Example from student project - McKeldin Library

  21. McKeldin Library Average daytime energy use: 200-250 KWH Average nighttime energy use: 150-200 KWH

  22. Example discussion section activity Carbon Reduction Treaty Your challenge is to negotiate a treaty to reduce global carbon emissions by 50% by the year 2030. To simplify, we divide the world (and your class) into two groups, developed countries (represented by the US) and developing countries (represented by China). You should consider each other’s needs and consequences to quality of life as you negotiate (remember that negotiation is the art of compromise). Listed below are various facts about each country to help you in formulating your arguments. Of the 50% reduction, how much should come from the US and how much from China? Do the Chinese have the “right” to use as much energy per person as we do in the US?

  23. Keep it current • Homework included investigating McCain/Obama energy policies • Visit campus Co-generation plant • Discussion of current events • Science • Politics • Read IPCC report • Guest speakers • Campus Conservation Manager • House Science Committee Staffer

  24. Lectures

  25. Sample lecture topic

  26. Daytime Running Lights – DRLsAre they worth the energy they consume?

  27. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How do we figure it out? • Estimate how much power 1 pair uses • Then figure out how many cars there are • Estimate how many hours DRLs would be on per car • Put it together and get the energy usage • Compare this to their benefits

  28. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • A typical pair headlights uses about 110 watts • Daytime running lights run at a lower wattage so they use less power. • Estimate how much wattage a pair of DRLs uses • 10 Watts • 30 Watts • 50 Watts • 70 Watts

  29. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How many cars are there in the US? • First we should ask: • How many people are there in the US? • 100 Million • 300 Million • 500 Million • 700 Million • 1 Billion

  30. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How many cars are there in the US? • 300 Million People (adults and children) • How many families? • 50 Million • 75 Million • 100 Million • 150 Million • 200 Million

  31. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How many cars are there in the US? • (100 Million families) • How many cars/family? • 0.5 • 1 • 1.5 • 2 • 2.5

  32. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How many cars are there in the US? – 200 Million • How far does the average car go per year? • 8,000 miles • 12,000 miles • 16,000 miles • 20,000 miles

  33. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How many cars are there in the US? – 200 Million • How far does a car go per year? – 12,000 miles • Vehicles in the US drove 2.5 trillion miles 2.5 x 1012 mi • To figure out how many hours car lights are on time= distance/<speed> • How fast does a car go on the average? (highway and city stop and go) • 20 MPH • 30 MPH • 40 MPH • 50 MPH • 60 MPH

  34. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • How long are they on for? • Vehicles in the US drove 2.5 trillion miles 2.5 x 1012 miles • (100 million families – 2 cars/fam. 12k miles/car) • Assume average speed say 30 mph • 2.5 x 1012 miles/ 30 mph = 8 x 1010 (80 billion) hours of driving • At 50 Watts – 4 x 1012 Whrs - 4 x 109 kWh (4 Billion kWh), but they we must subtract the time the headlights would be on…

  35. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • What fraction of the driving is at night when the headlights would be on anyway? • 5% • 15% • 25% • 35% • 45%

  36. Energy Usage by Daytime Running Lights • Say you drive normally 25% of the time at night where the lights would be on anyway -> 0.75 x 4 x 109 kWh • So we use 3 x 109 kWh extra electrical power in our cars • A gallon of gas contains about 130 MJ/gal or 36 kWh/gal • The car engine is about 30% efficient so we get 10kWh/gal • 3 x 109 kWh extra electrical power means 3 x 108 (300 million) gallons of gas/yr on DRLs • At $2.50 a gallon - $750M year and 5 Billion pounds of CO2 • Realistically its probably less that as most DRLs use less power

  37. Are they worth it?

  38. Benefit of Daytime Running Lights • Studies show anywhere from 7%-18% reduction in daytime accidents from use of DRLs (mostly head-on left-turns) • 6,420,000 auto accidents in the United States in 2005. The financial cost of these crashes is more than $230 Billion • If there is a only a 5% reduction in crashes because of DRLs then you save ~$10 Billion per year • 30,000 fatalities each year – 5% saves 1,500 lives (at $5M each -> $7.5B)

  39. Students were asked: • Why the trend? • “The economy has displaced global warming from the news” • “It’s the scientists fault for not being definitive enough” • Why, since this is a scientific question, do the responses break down on party lines? • Dems want green industries • Republicans want to protect big business • They get their news from different sources

  40. “balance” in news reporting – Curt Suplee “No, it’s not!” “Yes it is”

  41. One nut = biased coverage

  42. 2 nuts = balanced coverage

  43. 2 nuts = balanced coverage that ignores the consensus “We found that … through adherence to the norm of balance, the U.S. press systematically proliferated an informational bias.” -- Fairness and Accuracy in Media, 2002 report

  44. Final Exam (typical question) • One gallon of gasoline today costs ~$2.50 &contains 1.3 x 108 J (130MJ) of energy – • Compute the cost of the equivalent amount of electrical energy (at $0.10/kWh from Pepco). • J=1 Watt Sec Hour=3600 sec so 1kWh = 3.6MJ 130MJ/3.6(MJ/kWh) =  36 kWh @ $0.10 = $3.60 • Approximately how much would the gasoline cost @$2.50/gal to generate 130MJ of electrical energy using a gasoline-powered generator that uses an internal combustion engine (like a Honda generator). • ~25% efficient so 4 gallons - so ~$10

  45. Hamburger meat has about 1,300kcal/pound and costs about $3/pound. How much would it cost to get the equivalent energy to 1 gallon of gasoline from hamburger meat? • 1 kcal = 4184 joules  130MJ = 31,000 kcal /(1,300kcal/lbs) = 24 lbs -> $72 • There are about 8MJ in a pound of refined sugar and it costs $2 for a five-pound bag. How much would it cost to get the equivalent energy to 1 gallon of gasoline from refined sugar? • 130/8 = 16 lbs so 3.2 - 5 lb bags ->$6.40

  46. How do the answers to c & d above relate to the Trophic Pyramid • Cow/meat is an expensive way to store energy because it is higher up on the food chain! – It takes a 10 Kcal of grass to make 1 Kcal of cow

More Related