1 / 49

K-3 Scientifically Research Based Comprehensive Reading Programs

K-3 Scientifically Research Based Comprehensive Reading Programs. Why Scientifically Based Research?. Scientific Research…. is not subject to fads and fashions makes teaching more effective, productive, and efficient can be better generalized and replicated across many sites.

Download Presentation

K-3 Scientifically Research Based Comprehensive Reading Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. K-3 Scientifically Research BasedComprehensive Reading Programs

  2. Why Scientifically Based Research? Scientific Research… • is not subject to fads and fashions • makes teaching more effective, productive, and efficient • can be better generalized and replicated across many sites

  3. What Is Scientifically Based Reading Research (SBRR)? SBRR is research that: • applies rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to obtain valid knowledge relevant to reading development, reading instruction, and reading difficulties; and • employs systematic empirical methods that draw on observation or experiment; • involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn; • Insert 4 characteristics of scientific research from Reading First legislation and discuss what each one means for our confidence in findings • #2 • #3 • #4

  4. SBRR is research that… • relies on measurements or observational methods that provide valid data across evaluators and observers and across multiple measurements and observations; and • has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective and scientific review

  5. Important Research Documents

  6. Reading First Expectations All students will read at level by the end of third grade Sub-Grantees will use scientifically research based reading programs

  7. Reading First Grade Level Expectations States need to know, annually, whether they • are making progress towards reducing the number of students who are reading below grade level, • have significantly increased the number of students reading at grade level or above; and • have significantly increased the percentages of students in ethnic, racial, and low-income populations who are reading at grade level or above.

  8. System for More Students Reading At-Level Research-Based Comprehensive Reading Program For All Students Teacher (90 minutes) Research-Based In-Class Interventions Research-Based School Designed Interventions System for Individual Solutions School

  9. System for More Students Reading At-Level Research-Based Comprehensive Reading Program For All Students Professional Development Coaching Mentoring Research-Based In-Class Interventions Research-Based School Designed Interventions School System for Individual Solutions

  10. System for More Students Reading At-Level Data Research-Based Comprehensive Reading Program For All Students Data Research-Based In-Class Interventions Data Research-Based School Designed Interventions Data System for Individual Solutions

  11. 90 minutes Systematic Small groups Explicit 185 days a year Strategy instruction Correct difficulty System for More Students Reading At-Level Research-Based Comp. Reading Program For All Students Research-Based In-Class Interventions Research-Based School Designed Interventions System for Individual Solutions

  12. Types of K-3 Scientifically Research Based Reading Programs 1. Comprehensive reading programs 2. Supplemental reading programs 3. Intervention reading programs

  13. K-3 Scientifically Research BasedComprehensive Reading Programs

  14. Purpose of Comprehensive Reading Programs Increase the number of students reading at level by: • Providing complete instruction in the core components of reading • Providing systematic and explicit instruction • Providing ample practice for mastery • Reducing number of students needing intervention

  15. Purpose of Supplemental Reading Programs Provide additional instruction in one or more components of reading: 1. Phonemic Awareness 2. Phonics 3. Fluency 4. Vocabulary 5. Comprehension

  16. Purpose of Intervention Reading Programs Provide sufficient additional instruction to students performing below grade level to bring them to level in one or more components of reading: 1.Phonemic Awareness 2. Phonics 3. Fluency 4. Vocabulary 5. Comprehension

  17. More AboutK-3 Scientifically Research BasedComprehensive Reading Programs

  18. Scientifically Based Perspective: 2003 Scientifically Based Comprehensive Reading Programs Literature-based Instruction and Basal Reading Programs Basal Reading Programs 2003 1980 1990

  19. Defining Characteristics of Scientifically Based Comprehensive Reading Programs 1. Instructional Content 2. Instructional Design

  20. Instructional Content of Comprehensive Reading Programs These components present at the appropriate levels: 1. phonemic awareness instruction 2. systematic, explicit phonics instruction 3. fluency instruction 4. vocabulary instruction 5. comprehension instruction

  21. Instructional Design of Comprehensive Reading Programs Well-designed programs include: 1. explicit instructional strategies • Specific teacher instructions for teaching directly • Teacher modeling • Explicit student examples 2. coordinated instructional sequences 3. ample practice opportunities 4. aligned student materials

  22. Louisiana’s Reading Program Evaluation Process • Team of reading experts from around the country • Consumers’ Guide to Evaluating a Core Reading Program by Drs. Kame’enui and Simmons • Assessed the degree to which the core content and instructional design are scientifically based

  23. Classification Process 24

  24. More AboutInstructional Content of Comprehensive Reading Programs These components present at the appropriate levels: 1. phonemic awareness instruction 2. systematic, explicit phonics instruction 3. fluency instruction 4. vocabulary instruction 5. comprehension instruction

  25. Phonemic Awareness Instruction • “Phonemic awareness is the ability to hear, identify, and manipulate individual sounds in spoken words.” • “Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read.” • Put Reading First, pp. 10, 6

  26. 2. Systematic and Explicit Phonics Instruction • “Systematic and explicit phonics instruction is more effective than non-systematic or no phonics instruction.” • “Systematic and explicit phonics instruction significantly improves children’s reading comprehension.” • Put Reading First, pp. 13, 14

  27. 3. Fluency Instruction • “Reading fluency is the ability to read a text accurately and quickly.” • “Repeated and monitored oral reading improves reading fluency and overall reading achievement.” • Put Reading First, pp. 21, 24

  28. 4. Vocabulary Instruction • “Although a great deal of vocabulary is learned indirectly, some vocabulary should be taught directly.” • “Students learn vocabulary directly when then are explicitly taught both individual words and word-learning strategies. Direct vocabulary instruction aids reading comprehension.” • Put Reading First, p. 35-6

  29. 5. Comprehension Instruction • “Text comprehension can be improved by instruction that helps readers use specific comprehension strategies.” • “Effective comprehension strategy instruction is explicit, or direct.” • Put Reading First, pp. 49, 53

  30. More About Instructional Design of Comprehensive Reading Programs Well-designed programs include: 1. explicit instructional strategies • Specific teacher instructions for teaching directly • Teacher modeling • Explicit student examples 2. coordinated instructional sequences 3. ample practice opportunities 4. aligned student materials

  31. Design Features:1.Explicit Instructional Strategies

  32. Design Features:2. Coordinated Instructional Sequences

  33. Design Features: 3.Ample Practice

  34. Design Features: 4.Aligned Student Materials Example

  35. 4. Aligned Student MaterialsExample Research suggests that: “… a high proportion of the words in the earliest selections children read should conform to the phonics they have already been taught. Otherwise they will not have enough opportunity to practice, extend, and refine their knowledge of letter-sound relationships.” • Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.

  36. System for More Students Reading At-Level Research-Based Core Reading Program For All Students Professional Development Coaching Mentoring Research-Based In-Class Interventions Research-Based School Designed Interventions Reading Leadership Team Creation System for Individual Solutions

  37. Reading Programs PLUS Professional Development • Reading programs contain numerous activities: • Professional development should help teachers choose those activities essential for effective reading instruction.

  38. Assessment Screening Progress monitoring Outcomes Intervention Daily in-class interventions More explicitness More modeling More practice More corrective feedback Schoolwide interventions Reading Programs PLUS Assessment and Intervention

  39. System for More Students Reading At-Level Data Research-Based Comprehensive Reading Program For All Students Data Research-Based In-Class Interventions Data Research-Based School Designed Interventions Data System for Individual Solutions

  40. Improving the Reading Program by Adding Assessment and Intervention • Hartsfield Elementary School Characteristics: • 70% Free and Reduced Lunch (increasing) • 65% minority (mostly African-American) • Elements of Curriculum Change: • Movement to a more research-based reading curriculum beginning in 1994-1995 school year for K-2 (incomplete implementation) • Improved implementation in 1995-1996 • Implementation in Fall of 1996 of screening and more intensive small group instruction for at-risk students

  41. Early Screening Identifies Children Who Need Additional Intervention For example, in one longitudinal study: • 201 randomly selected children from five elementary schools serving children from mixed SES and ethnic backgrounds were followed from the beginning of first grade to the end of fourth grade. • Children who scored low on phonemic awareness and letter knowledge at the beginning of first grade • Started with lower skills • Made less progress • Fell further and further below grade level as they progressed from first through fourth grade.

  42. 5.2 2.5 Early Screening Identifies Children At Risk of Reading Difficulty 4 3 Low Risk on Early Screening Reading grade level 2 1 At Risk on Early Screening K 1 2 3 4 Grade level corresponding to age

  43. Additional Instructional Intervention Changes Reading Outcomes • Four years later, the researchers went back to the same schools. Two major changes were implemented: • First, a research-based comprehensive reading program was implemented for all students, and • Second, children at risk for reading difficulty were randomly assigned to a control group or to a group receiving substantial instructional intervention.

  44. With substantial instructional intervention 4.9 With research-based core but without extra instructional intervention 3.2 Intervention Control Early Intervention Changes Reading Outcomes 5.2 5 4 Low Risk on Early Screening Reading grade level 3 2.5 2 At Risk on Early Screening 1 1 2 3 4 Grade level corresponding to age

  45. Improved implementation of research-based comprehensive reading program Screening at beginning of first grade, with additional instructional intervention for those in bottom 30-40% 31.8 20.4 10.9 6.7 3.7 Hartsfield Elementary SchoolProgress Over Five Years Proportion falling below the 25th percentile in word reading ability at the end of first grade 30 20 10 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Average Percentile 48.9 55.2 61.4 73.5 81.7 for entire grade (n=105)

  46. How will Reading First help schools and teachers produce successful readers? • By focusing on high quality, comprehensive K-3 classroom reading instruction for all children • By basing instructional decisions on what works • By putting the solid research base about reading instruction into the hands of teachers

  47. How will Louisiana schools know if they have a strong reading system?

  48. Every third grader will be reading at-level!

More Related