identifying research based practices for rti scientifically based reading instruction l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI : Scientifically-based Reading Instruction PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI : Scientifically-based Reading Instruction

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 36

Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI : Scientifically-based Reading Instruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on

Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI : Scientifically-based Reading Instruction. Janet S. Twyman, Ph.D., BCBA. Presented at the 2 nd Annual Evidenced-Based Practices Summit of the Wing Institute Berkeley, CA April 26, 2007. Historical Perspective: Reading in America.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI : Scientifically-based Reading Instruction' - lixue


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
identifying research based practices for rti scientifically based reading instruction

Identifying Research-based Practices for RtI: Scientifically-based Reading Instruction

Janet S. Twyman, Ph.D., BCBA

Presented at the 2nd AnnualEvidenced-Based Practices Summitof the Wing Institute

Berkeley, CA

April 26, 2007

historical perspective reading in america
Historical Perspective: Reading in America
  • After a century and a half of universal public education, and despite the highest per-pupil expenditure on public elementary and secondary education in the world,

40 percent of U.S. fourth-graders are reading below the minimally acceptable level (NAEP 2006).

  • For minority students in inner-city schools, the reading failure rate is 65 percent.
  • Children who don’t read by fourth grade almost always fall behind in all other subjects, frequently require special education programs, and, as adults, have higher rates of drug addiction, incarceration, and welfare dependency.
legislation to avert our national reading crisis
Legislation to Avert our National Reading Crisis

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 commits the nation to ensuring that every child in the country will learn to read by the end of third grade.

Within NCLB, Reading First was first authorized at more than $6 billion to apply scientifically based reading research to strengthen children’s reading skills from kindergarten through third grade.

Yet, at $1 billion per yearit accounts for only 2 percent of federal education spending.

reading first an overview
Reading First – An Overview
  • As part of NCLB, it mandates that the best scientific research should guide the teaching of reading.
  • It supports research-based methods to ensure that every child in public schools reads at or above grade level by third grade.
  • The essential components of reading instruction are defined in the bill as explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness; phonics; vocabulary development; reading fluency, including oral reading skills; and reading comprehension strategies.
reading first what it means to schools
Reading First – What it Means to Schools
  • Preparing teachers through professional development and other support, so they can identify specific reading barriers facing their students and have the tools to effectively help their student to learn to read.
  • Selecting or developing rigorous diagnostic reading assessments that document (1) effectiveness in improving students' reading and (2) the schools accountability for their results.
  • Selecting or developing effective instructional materials, programs, and strategies to implement methods that have been proven to prevent or remediate reading failure (including newly identified Response to Intervention Initiatives).
  • Establishing reading programs for students in grades kindergarten through 3 that are grounded in scientifically-based reading research (SBRR), in order to ensure that every student can read at grade level or above by the end of the third grade.
what the law says is scientifically based reading research
What the Law says is Scientifically-Based Reading Research

The term `scientifically based reading research' means research that--

(A) applies rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to obtain valid knowledge relevant to reading development, reading instruction, and reading difficulties; and

(B) includes research that--

(i) employs systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation or experiment;

(ii) involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;

(iii) relies on measurements or observational methods that provide valid data across evaluators and observers and across multiple measurements and observations; and

(iv) has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective, and scientific review.

Source: H.R.1. 2001

scientifically based controversies abound
“Scientifically-based” - Controversies Abound

There little agreement about what constitutes “evidence.”

  • NCLB permits both quantitative and qualitative evidence (without clearly specifying the types of questions best answered by each approach).
  • Only small number of interventions used today have been empirically evaluated by some peer-reviewed standard.
  • Evidence-based interventions are less likely to be used than interventions for which there is no evidence or evidence showsa lack of impact (Kazdin, 2000).
  • In many instances educators/practitioners are not aware of evidence-based interventions (Kratochwill, Albers & Shernoff, 2004).

Source: Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). Evidence-based Education: It Isn’t as Simple as You Might Think.

what the education field refers to as research based
What the education field refers to as “Research-Based”

Current uses of the term research–based in federal documents and journal articles (referred to as “evidence” when applied to early reading programs):

  • the program contains elements that research suggests are effective (see for example Simmons & Kame’enui, 2003)
  • pretest vs. posttest or simple comparison studies have provided some evidence of effectiveness for an instructional program, or
  • the program has undergone some form of scientifically controlled study, often involving randomized control groups (Coalition for Evidence–Based Policy, 2003)
however
However,

…these uses fail to distinguish between the scientific development of a program, and the scientific evaluation of outcomes after a program has been developed.

types of research to consider when evaluating programs
Types of “Research” to consider when evaluating programs:
  • Research-InformedA program based upon best practices identified by research or contain elements that other research suggests are effective.-No requirement that the program itself be scientifically designed.
  • Research-Filtered (Summative Evaluation)A program, regardless of how it was designed, measured against an alternative form of instruction, or at times, no instruction at all. -No requirement that the program itself be scientifically designed.
  • Research-Guided (Formative Evaluation)A program that has been scientifically designed and tested during its development (most often guided by previous research results). In the research–guided approach, formative evaluation is intertwined into the instructional design protocols, and at its most thorough influences program development through iterations of testing, revising, and testing again.
how does one know what evidence to use
How does one know what “evidence” to use?
  • Evidence is more than ONE study showing support.
    • Involves a body of knowledge, specifying:
      • the quality of evidence
      • the quantity and type of replication of effects
  • Level or rigor of evidence falls along a continuum.
    • Sufficient Threshold:
      • Evidence must be of a specific quantity and quality before a program should be considered evidence-based.
    • Hierarchy of evidence approach:
      • Rely on the best available evidence to date.

Source: Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). Evidence-based Education: It Isn’t as Simple as You Might Think.

continuums of evidence

Research-Guided and Informed

Current “Gold Standard”High QualityRandomized Controlled Trial

Meta-analysis (systematic review)

Single Case Designs

Repeated Systematic Measures

Research-Guided

Semi-Randomized Trials

Single Case Replication (Direct and Parametric)

Well-conducted Clinical Studies

Research-Filtered

Threshold of Evidence

Convergent Evidence

Uncontrolled Studies

Research-Informed

Expert Opinion

Consensus of Experts

Various Investigations

General Consensus

Common Wisdom or Lore

Personal Observation

Single Study

Continuums of Evidence

Quantity of the Evidence

Quality of the Evidence

Program Development

are we preparing our teachers
Are we preparing our teachers?

How can we expect oureducators to understand evidence-based instructionin reading, if our teacher preparation institutions aren’t teaching reading science?

85% earned a “failing” grade, even though a passing grade was possible if a professor devoted less than 20 percent of the lectures to the science of reading.

All 5 4/5 3/5 2/5 1/5 None ofcomponents the components

Source: National Council on Teacher Quality

when faced with evidence
When faced with “evidence”

…ask at least three questions:

  • Is the evidence valid?Where does the evidence fit within the continuum? Could it be biased?
  • Is it important?Are the findings to relevant your situation? What is the significance of the outcome compared to other options?
  • Is it applicable to the learner in front of me?Are the participants and procedures in the original research comparable to your learner and setting?
sources for evidence
Sources for “Evidence”

http://www.whatworks.ed.gov

florida center for reading research
Florida Center for Reading Research

www.fcrr.org/FCRRreports

Provides one of the most comprehensive lists of reviews of reading programs

http://www.fcrr.org

oregon reading first
Oregon Reading First

“Curriculum Review” leads to the Consumer's Guide to Evaluating Reading Programsan evaluation of various reading programs.

http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu

big ideas in beginning reading
Big Ideas in Beginning Reading

http://reading.uoregon.edu/curricula/

promising practices network
Promising Practices Network

http://www.promisingpractices.net/programs.asp

national institute for literacy
National Institute for Literacy

http://www.nifl.gov/cgi-bin/pfr/search.cgi

california learning resource network
California Learning ResourceNetwork

Logging in provides access to evaluations of reading programs

http://www.clrn.org

interventions in school psych
Interventions in School Psych.

“Projects” leads to:

Procedural and Coding Manual for Identification of Evidence-Based Interventions

http://www.sp-ebi.org

other interventions
Other Interventions

http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/index.htm

iris center star legacy modules
IRIS Center – Star Legacy Modules

Interactive Tutorials on:ACCOMMODATIONS

BEHAVIOR

COLLABORATION

DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION

Response to Intervention

Reading Strategies

DISABILITY

DIVERSITY

scientifically based reading research sbrr http www headsprout com aol teachers cfm
Scientifically Based Reading Research (SBRR)http://www.headsprout.com/aol/teachers.cfm
reading first technical assistance centers
Reading FirstTechnical Assistance Centers

Western Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center (WRRFTAC)

Center on Teaching & LearningUniversity of Oregon (Eugene)

(541) 346-1608

Central Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center (CRRFTAC)

Center for Reading & Language Arts

The University of Texas at Austin(512) 232-1901

Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center (ERRFTAC)

Florida Center for Reading ResearchFlorida State University (Tallahassee)

(850) 644-9352

what does this mean for real educators real students real classrooms
What does this mean for real educators, real students, real classrooms?
  • Find and use programs with rigorous levels of research
    • Programs furthest along the continuum of empirical evidence of effectiveness (quantity, quality, and type of program development)
    • Access available public resources reviewing “evidence”
    • Learn from the community of available tools and tutorials
  • Use and be responsive to data from your own students, classroom, school
    • CCCROD
    • CBM
    • Progress Monitoring
      • DIBELS*
      • AIMSweb*
need for research into practice

Source:

Need for Research into Practice
  • A key outcome of evidence-based education is for scientifically proven interventions to be adopted and successfully implemented at the “practice” level.
  • In order for research to translate into practice, interventions must be efficacious (have a foundation in rigorous scientific research) as well as effective (address the necessary social influence factors to ensure the desired outcomes).
rti facilitates the use of evidence and research based programs
RtI facilitates the use of evidence and research-based programs
  • RtI framework encourages a system for identifying: need, treatments, measuring progress and outcomes, evaluating teaching practices, and revising whenever the data indicate to do so.
  • RtI is integral to knowing what is working and what is not, for each individual child.
relevance for special education students
Relevance for Special Education students
  • For some students require the modification of the general education reading curriculum, in terms of content or instructional approach.
  • Other students may require general education classroom reading instruction to be supplemented with an alternative, more intensive program.
  • Yet other students may require a complete replacement reading program, including other publicly available materials, or “teacher-devised” curricula.
suggested principles regarding reading instruction for special education students
Suggested Principles Regarding Reading Instruction for Special Education Students
  • Address all areas of the reading process as identified by reading research.
  • Identify, early, students demonstrating difficulty learning to read.
  • Design a tier (continuum) of intervention services prior to referral to special education.
  • Include in each special education student’s individual plan of instruction carefully selected curriculum and instructional techniques matched to student needs.
  • Base instructional plans on initial and ongoing assessment that reflects research-based best practice, including a historical analysis of the student’s reading instruction, consideration of the student’s specific characteristics and knowledge of the student’s deficits and strengths.
  • Use assessment data to guide and inform instruction.
  • Vary the intensity of intervention (amount of time for reading instruction, the size of the instructional group, means of service delivery, and the nature of the selected reading curriculum) provided to individual special education students based on the level of need and progress made (or lack thereof).
  • Use technology, as appropriate, to enhance the development of reading skills and to ameliorate the effects of deficiencies in reading.

Handout available in resource packet.

important caveat
IMPORTANT CAVEAT
  • Don’t become formulaic;even with SBRR or RTI
  • Never lose sight of your own ongoing data collection and analysis