1 / 26

Managing environmental change

Managing environmental change. Learning objectives: Understand environmental change and be able to categorise change Appreciate the dependence of environmental management on good physical geography Understand basic environmental management tools and management processes

red
Download Presentation

Managing environmental change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Managing environmental change • Learning objectives: • Understand environmental change and be able to categorise change • Appreciate the dependence of environmental management on good physical geography • Understand basic environmental management tools and management processes • Evaluate problems and processes involved in implementation of environmental interventions

  2. Introduction • Physical geography is studied for intellectual curiosity but also because to manage the way we impact on the environment • Environmental management is the practical application of physical geography • Silent Spring 1962 – Rachel Carson • Communicating dangers of DDT • Warning that finally awoke the world to the significance of the environment • However, the environment is the focus of more talk than action • Johannesburg conference of 2003 is the most obvious evidence • Arguably, the management of environmental change is one of the most important areas of science and management today • Full of uncertainty • Requires precautionary principle • However this involves risk

  3. Table 23.1

  4. Characteristics of change • Definitions: • Manage – to direct or control the use of • Environment – the combination of external or extrinsic conditions that effect the growth and development of organisms • Change – a transition from one state, phase or condition to another • Change is however not a single or simple concept • Unreversible, quick and unstable • Reversible, slow and stable • Linear, nonlinear or contain hysteresis • Management decision has to be aware of the complexities of change so as not to exacerbate it

  5. Table 23.2

  6. Figure 23.1

  7. Rate of change • Rate of onset is vital because if slow… • It offers opportunity for species to adapt or shift range • Provides time for the manager to devise and implement remediation strategy • Offers politicians sufficient time to perceive damage • May also be problem because politicians look on shorter scales • Non linearity and rapid alteration in rate = very concerning • Catastrophe theory • Non-linear shift between stable states without the prospect of reverse • Example: • Very slow warming climate trend may cause catastrophic shutting down of the thermohaline circulation • Sends the N Hemisphere system into a cold phase with further positive feedback (e.g. rapid ice sheet growth)

  8. Figure 23.2

  9. Environmental tolerance • Environmental tolerance = valuable concept • Every species has a range of environmental conditions within which it can operate e.g. temperature etc • Law of limiting factors – when conditions fall outside any one of these the organism cannot survive • Same concept appears as ‘bottleneck theory’ and ‘threshold theory’. • In reality this relates to more than just the ecological definition • All Earth surface-ocean-atmosphere-biosphere environments • Merges with the concept of Gaia (James Lovelock, 1979) • Different scales of tolerance • Individual species within an ecosystem have tolerance ranges • Entire ecosystem as a whole has a tolerance range • Scale of environmental change has to be greater to destroy ecosystem than individual species • Diverse ecosystems tend to be more tolerant

  10. The ‘duty’ and need to manage change • Economic and political imperatives always appear to have the highest priorities – except under ‘environmental ethics’ • ‘Environmental ethics’ does not place humans at the top of decisions • We have a duty to care for other species and the Earth itself • Tragedy of the commons (Hardin, 1968) • we must think of the actions of others and not just our own • Analogy – farmers seek to maximise personal profit by adding cattle to common property until environmental degradation ensues • Applies to allowing people the freedom to pollute the atmosphere and oceans • We have a finite resource and we must therefore manage those resources • Need to identify alternatives to over-exploitation

  11. Figure 23.4 Source: Photo courtesy of Joseph Holden

  12. Types of change to be managed • 3 types of environmental change: 1. Responding to natural environmental change 2. Controlling anthropogenic environmental change 3. Implementing local change • ‘Coping strategies’ • necessary response to natural change – we cannot alter or reverse it. • ‘Sustainable development’1987 World Commission on Sustainable Development • ‘Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ • Applies to long term management • Anthropogenic change is usually more rapid than natural • Usually unidirectional rather than cyclical and broadly irreversible • Management options – (1) coping strategies or (2) limit the drivers • Requires political, legal and economic will to curtail the activity

  13. Table 23.3

  14. Tools for management • The manager needs to be able to identify the nature, scale and timing of the impact of any actions • Hazard assessment • Especially slope, solute and tectonic processes • Often spatial in approach • Justifies acquisition of funds for difficult management strategies • Impact assessment • EIA’s, HIA’s, Environmental Technology Assessment, Social Impact Assessment • Manager seeks to identify, quantify, aggregate impacts • All assessments have generic similarity (e.g. include a scoping study and should be prospective) • Driven by checklists and matrices

  15. Figure 23.7

  16. Table 23.4a Source:Environment Agency

  17. Table 23.4a cont. Source:Environment Agency

  18. Table 23.4b Source:Environment Agency

  19. Table 23.4b cont. Source:Environment Agency

  20. Table 23.4c Source:Environment Agency

  21. Table 23.4c cont. Source:Environment Agency

  22. Life costing • Combining impact assessment and forecasting allows life cycle analysis • Life cycle analysis • Evaluation of all the environmental impacts of a product from the time the raw materials are taken from the Earth to when the product is thrown away and added to the ecosystem (inc manufacture, use, disposal) • Ecological footprint • The areas of biosphere required to sustain an individual, company/organisation or country • Requires detailed physical geography science – use of the environment • Environmental economics • Managers have to justify the resources for actions that need to be taken • Therefore express environmental impacts in monetary values to promote communication with decision makers • Whole life costing • LCA merged with the financial expression of the consequences

  23. Implementation: stakeholder involvement • Need to build a consensus for action by all those with an interest in the issue (often a great deal of people) • Stake holder analysis - identifies stakeholders (brainstorming) • Adequate identification is the foundation of consensus building • 2003 Chinese government paid compensation for ignoring protestors over the development of the Hong Kong harbour • Consensus on a single inflexible approach is very unlikely, it causes: • Legal process for resolving is expensive and lengthy • Create ‘martyrs’ • Future opposition to similar projects will be stronger/more organised • International disagreement can result in stalemate e.g. US - Kyoto • Alternative dispute resolution – avoids winners and losers • Propose a range of options through options analysis • Participatory analysis – involving stakeholders in the decision process

  24. Table 23.6 Source: From van Ast and Boot, 2003

  25. Project management • The delivery of an agreed objective to an agreed timescale, requires 1) clearly specified feasible objective 2) the resources to reach the objective • Involves the sub-division of the project into a series of tasks • Each having a clear specification, resource allocation, time duration • Need identification of the relationships between tasks • Tasks might not be in sequence or at the same time • Large projects usually require a network of tasks • Large projects require definitions of milestones and deliverables – key stages • When managing environmental change there will be a large element of uncertainty • Need to monitor outcomes throughout the project • Problem - there are often too many outcomes or many members of the monitoring group may not be familiar with the science • How does a non-technical project manager or oversight group measure progress? • Need indicators to improve ease of communication

  26. Summary • Environmental management is about the management of change • Stop a detrimental change or encourage responsible change • Change is not simple and predictable • Linear, nonlinear, hysteric, reversible, irreversible • Environmental impact assessments are important environmental tools allowing determination of the merits of management options • The money to pay for environmental management will only be provided if politicians are willing to provide finance. Requires consensus of support for a given action by all stakeholders involved. • Monitoring of environmental management techniques put into practice is vital

More Related