Labour market statistics- State of play

1. Labour market statistics-State of play Lourdes Prado Eurostat Unit E4 Regional statistics and geographical information Lourdes.PRADO-URENA@ec.europa.eu

2. STRUCTURE OF THE TALK • Background • Sources • Dissemination • Conclusions and future steps Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

3. 1. Background • Present clear picture of regional labour market data dealt with in Unit E4 • Growing in interest in regional data  Changes in data compilation need to be carried out • NUTS 2 data - Compiled in Unit F2 (Labour Market) - EU-LFS accurate information national and NUTS 2 level - Microdata provided by all participating countries - Production & dissemination of complete set of indicators • NUTS 3 data  Needed - No legal basis for transmission in LFS - Countries transmitting on a voluntary basis Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

4. 2. Sources • Source for NUTS 2 EU-LFS MS transmit data to Unit F2 F2 provides data to Unit E4 Data for year T validated, uploaded and released in T+1 • Complex situation for NUTS 3 Changes needed • NUTS 3 in the past not transmitted under LFS Request made to MS by unit E4. No microdata transmission, but tabulated aggregates. • Recent years MS started to send NUTS 3 codes in the LFS microdata to unit F2 (TASK framework). Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

5. 2. Sources • Currently2 sources for NUTS 3 data - Tabulated aggregates sent by RESCOs to Unit E4 - NUTS 3 codes in LFS microdata sent to Unit F2 Both on a voluntary basis Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

6. 2. Sources • Tabulated aggregates (for NUTS 3) sent to Unit E4 - One single request from this year onwards - Last data: 2010 (emp, unemp, act pop, work age pop) - MS reporting: 19 (BG, CZ, DE, EE, IE, ES, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, AT, PL, RO, SI, SK, SE and UK). Waiting for data from DK. - No answer: BE, MT, PT - Gr and FI not sending data to E4. E4 uses data from F2. - Not applicable: CY and LU - No data requested to EFTA and Candidate countries - LFS source used by most of the countries - Some MS use other sources (registers, small area estimation, etc.) or a combination of LFS and other sources (DK, DE, FR, NL, AT). Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

7. Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

8. 2. Sources • NUTS 3 codes in the LFS microdata sent to unit F2: - TASK framework. NUTS 3 data not for publication, but aggregated. - Last data: 2001 Q2 - Coverage considerably improved - 20 MS (BE, BG, CZ, DK, EE, IE, GR, ES, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, AT, SK, FI, SE and UK) plus Norway transmitting data - 5 MS not providing NUTS 3 codes in LFS microdata: DE, PL, PT, RO and SI. - Not applicable for CY and LU • Picture considering both sources: - Data available for 24 MS from one source or another - No data available for PT - 15 MS transmitting data to both units - From this, 4 MS using other sources apart from LFSpossible differences in data Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

9. Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

10. 3. Sources • 2 issues raised: - MS are being contacted twice concerning the same data. Is this necessary? - Inconsistencies in the two datasets for some countries. Which source to be used if this is the case? • Possible approachCoutries providing just LFS based data could stop the tranmission to unit E4 if they enable this unit to use the NUTS 3 microdata sent to unit F2 in LFS transmissions. • Those countries using other sources appart from LFS would continue reporting to E4. Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

11. 2. Sources • Participants are asked to: - Confirm the state of play of NUTS 3 labour market data transmissions - Give their view on the issues raised concerning sources - Enable Eurostat unit E4 to use the NUTS 3 microdata sent in the LFS transmission to unit F2 Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

12. 3. Dissemination • NUTS 2 Complete series of tables and indicators available in both the regional and the LFS domains. Data for year T published before summer break in T+1 followed by SIF and Press Release http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/region_cities/regional_statistics/data/database • NUTS 3 Reflection needed on 2 issues - Establishment of publication level NUTS 3 used for measuring labour market disparities (dispersion, upr) NUTS 3 at aggregated level (Metropolitan regions, urban-rural) User demand for unemployment rates at NUTS 3 level - Establishment of validation/reliability rules in line with those in the EU-LFS Publishing Guidelines. Reliability restrictions, set the limits below which data should be flagged or not published. Feedback from MS needed for both issues Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

13. 4. Conclusions • NUTS 3 data growing in importancecrucial for cohesion analysis and policy making • Powerful reasons to reflect on the status of the NUTS 3 labour market data collection: - 2 sources - quality and validation questioned - some MS not sure about the reliability of the data • Changes neededsound and reliable NUTS 3 dataset aimed at • Eurostat is working on the possibility of launching a project Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

14. 4. Conclusions • Participants are asked to give their feedback on the following issues regarding the NUTS 3 level: - Source to be used - Agree on the use of LFS NUTS 3 microdata by unit E4 - Data to be released - Validation/reliability rules Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development

15. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development