1 / 19

State of play

State of play. Evaluations undertaken for DG REGIO. Ex post evaluation of ERDF Objective 1 & 2 (2000-2006). Kai Stryczynski, Anna Burylo Evaluation Unit. State of play. In the middle of the work, first final reports ahead Many evaluations in stage of case studies; See distributed list

jeffreywaters
Download Presentation

State of play

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State of play Evaluations undertaken for DG REGIO

  2. Ex post evaluation of ERDF Objective 1 & 2 (2000-2006) Kai Stryczynski, Anna Burylo Evaluation Unit

  3. State of play In the middle of the work, first final reports ahead • Many evaluations in stage of case studies; See distributed list • WP 5a+b: Survey on outputs for all programmes • Draft final reports • WP 10 (unit costs) + WP 11 (management): June • WP 9 (rural)+ WP 7 (gender+demography): July

  4. WP 10, unit costs: data collection

  5. WP 11Management and ImplementationSystems • Short country overviews: published Under consultation: • EU10: assessment of Effectiveness, Sustainability and Spillover Effects (10 National Assessment Reports) • EU15: assessment of Added Value (7 Cases Studies) • EU25: assessment of Sustainable Development (10 Case Studies) • Final Report with Conclusions and Recommendations: mid-year 2009

  6. Use of evaluation (selection) • Hearing planned on 23 June (WP 7, 10,11) • Open days seminar (5-8 October): • WP Transport, Environment, URBAN, INTERREG • Seminar on structural change (WP 4):Oct 09 • Summary report (WP 1): beginning of 2010

  7. State of play by work package • See next four slides for details! • All published reports: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/rado_en.htm

  8. Annex: State of play by WP - I • WP1 (coordination + summary report): • „Country stories“ published • Update of GDP statistics in April • WP2 (database on indicators) • Finished, on Inforegio • WP 3 (HERMIN, QUEST): • Summer 2009

  9. Annex: State of play by WP - II • WP 4 (structural change + globalisation) • First interim report published (literature review etc) • WP 5a (transport) • Case studies underway • WP 5b (environment and climate change) • Case studies underway • WP 6 (business environment + innovation) • Case studies underway

  10. Annex: State of play by WP - III • WP 7 (structural change + globalisation) • Preparing draft final report • WP 8 (transport modelling) • Summer 2009 • WP 9 (rural development) • Case studies underway • WP 10 (business environment + innovation) • Data collection finished

  11. Ex post evaluation of URBAN (2000-2006) Daniel Mouqué Evaluation Unit

  12. URBAN interim report - June • Survey of the 70 programmes (output result and context data, interviews, etc) • Control group work where data (~50) • Evaluation of URBACT Final report - October • 15 in depth case studies • Analysis, policy recommendations

  13. Ex post evaluation of INTERREG III (2000-2006) Pasi Rantahalvari Evaluation Unit

  14. Main objectives of the evaluation • Targeting policy-level conclusions on the overall impact of the programmes • To help to improve the implementation of the current programmes • To provide evidence-based recommendations for the future programme design • The evaluation is about integrating accountability objective with the policy objective • To tell ‘a story’ of Interreg III

  15. Main tasks of the evaluation • Policy and literature analysis (task 1) • Data gathering and analysis (facts&figures)(task 2) • financial data & outputs, results, impacts → An overview of all 81 programmes • Analysis of Espon and Interact (task 3) • Developing a synthetic indicator and typology (task 4) • measuring the depth and intensity of co-operation • creating groups of programmes with main characteristics • Indepth analysis of 16 programmes (task 5) • on the basis of which conclusions can be extrapolated to all 79 programmes (excluding Espon and Interact) • Main conclusions and strategic recommendations (task 6)

  16. Time schedule anddeliverables • The inception report was approved in February 2009 • 1st interim report in June • data gathering on 81 programmes, draft Espon&Interact reports, a synthetic indicator and typology • selection of 16 OPs for indepth analysis • 2nd interim in September • Indepth analysis completed • Final report in December 2009

  17. Study on the translation of Art.16 Reg.1083/2006 (2007-2013) Cvetina Yocheva Evaluation Unit

  18. Gender equality, anti-discrimination & accessibility for disabled • Scope: interventions co-financed by ERDF & CF in EU27 for 2007-2013 • Aim: to what extent Art.16 is reflected in OPs + recommendations on how to strengthen the three themes • Method: 50 OPs to be reviewed → 15 examples of good practices • Timing: January – September 2009

  19. Thank you for your attention

More Related