1 / 25

INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY of SWITCHED SYSTEMS

INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY of SWITCHED SYSTEMS. Debasish Chatterjee, Linh Vu, Daniel Liberzon. Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. ISS under ADT SWITCHING.

rcrocker
Download Presentation

INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY of SWITCHED SYSTEMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY of SWITCHED SYSTEMS Debasish Chatterjee, Linh Vu, Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  2. ISS under ADT SWITCHING Suppose functions class functions and constants such that : • . each subsystem is ISS If has average dwell time then switched system is ISS [Vu–Chatterjee–L, Automatica, Apr 2007]

  3. SKETCH of PROOF Let be switching times on Consider Recall ADT definition: 1 1 2 3

  4. SKETCH of PROOF – ISS 1 2 3 2 1 3 • GAS when • ISS under arbitrary switching if (common ) • ISS without switching (single ) Special cases:

  5. VARIANTS • Stability margin • Integral ISS (with stability margin) finds application in switching adaptive control • Output-to-state stability (OSS) [M. Müller] • Stochastic versions of ISS for randomly switched • systems [D. Chatterjee] • Some subsystems not ISS [Müller, Chatterjee]

  6. INVERTIBILITY of SWITCHED SYSTEMS Aneel Tanwani, Linh Vu, Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  7. PROBLEM FORMULATION Invertibility problem: recover uniquely from for given • Desirable: fault detection (in power systems) • Undesirable: security (in multi-agent networked systems) Related work:[Sundaram–Hadjicostis, Millerioux–Daafouz]; [Vidal et al., Babaali et al., De Santis et al.]

  8. MOTIVATING EXAMPLE because Guess:

  9. INVERTIBILITY of NON-SWITCHED SYSTEMS Linear: [Brockett–Mesarovic, Silverman, Sain–Massey, Morse–Wonham]

  10. INVERTIBILITY of NON-SWITCHED SYSTEMS Linear: [Brockett–Mesarovic, Silverman, Sain–Massey, Morse–Wonham] Nonlinear: [Hirschorn, Isidori–Moog, Nijmeijer, Respondek, Singh]

  11. INVERTIBILITY of NON-SWITCHED SYSTEMS Suppose it has relative degree at : Then we can solve for : Inverse system Linear: [Brockett–Mesarovic, Silverman, Sain–Massey, Morse–Wonham] Nonlinear: [Hirschorn, Isidori–Moog, Nijmeijer, Respondek, Singh] SISO nonlinear system affine in control:

  12. BACK to the EXAMPLE – similar We can check that each subsystem is invertible For MIMO systems, can use nonlinear structure algorithm

  13. SWITCH-SINGULAR PAIRS Consider two subsystems and is a switch-singular pair if such that |||

  14. FUNCTIONAL REPRODUCIBILITY SISO system affine in control with relative degreeat : For given and , that produces this output if and only if

  15. CHECKING for SWITCH-SINGULAR PAIRS is a switch-singular pair for SISO subsystems with relative degrees if and only if For linear systems, this can be characterized by a matrix rank condition MIMO systems – via nonlinear structure algorithm Existence of switch-singular pairs is difficult to check in general

  16. MAIN RESULT Theorem: Switched system is invertible at over output set if and only if each subsystem is invertible at and there are no switch-singular pairs no switch-singular pairs can recover subsystems are invertible can recover Idea of proof: The devil is in the details

  17. BACK to the EXAMPLE Stop here because relative degree For every , and with form a switch-singular pair Switched system is not invertible on the diagonal Let us check for switched singular pairs:

  18. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Recall our example again:

  19. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Solution from : switch-singular pair Recall our example again:

  20. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Solution from : Recall our example again: switch-singular pair

  21. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Case 1: no switch at Then up to At , must switch to 2 But then Recall our example again: won’t match the given output

  22. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Recall our example again: Case 2: switch at No more switch-singular pairs

  23. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all Recall our example again: Case 2: switch at No more switch-singular pairs

  24. OUTPUT GENERATION Given and , find (if exist) s.t. may be unique for some but not all We also obtain from Recall our example again: Case 2: switch at No more switch-singular pairs We see how one switch can help recover an earlier “hidden” switch

  25. CONCLUSIONS • Showed how results on stability under slow switching • extend in a natural way to external stability (ISS) • Studied new invertibility problem: recovering both the • input and the switching signal • Both problems have applications in control design • General motivation/application: analysis and design • of complex interconnected systems

More Related